Skip to content

GO-2024-2780 CVE-2019-11245 GHSA-r76g-g87f-vw8f

Kubelet Incorrect Privilege Assignment in k8s.io/kubernetes

Medium Go
Severity
4.9 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.60%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 48.67% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-266 Incorrect Privilege Assignment
CWE-703 Improper Check or Handling of Exceptional Conditions
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

Kubelet Incorrect Privilege Assignment in k8s.io/kubernetes

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
k8s.io/kubernetes
>= 1.13.0, < 1.13.7
>= 1.14.0, < 1.14.3
1.13.7
1.14.3
k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubelet
>= 1.14.0, < 1.14.3
1.14.3
k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubelet
>= 1.13.0, < 1.13.7
1.13.7

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

k8s.io/kubernetes Go → 1.14.3

go
go get k8s.io/kubernetes@v1.14.3 && go mod tidy

k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubelet Go → 1.14.3

go
go get k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubelet@v1.14.3 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.0 4.9

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

Weakness

CWE-266: Incorrect Privilege Assignment

A product incorrectly assigns a privilege to a particular actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.

CWE-703: Improper Check or Handling of Exceptional Conditions

The product does not properly anticipate or handle exceptional conditions that rarely occur during normal operation of the product.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-r6j8-c6r2-37rr
kube-controller-manager is vulnerable to half-blind Server Side Request Forgery through in-tree Portworx StorageClass
Medium Also affects k8s.io/kubernetes
GHSA-4x4m-3c2p-qppc
Kubernetes Nodes can delete themselves by adding an OwnerReference
Medium Also affects k8s.io/kubernetes
GHSA-hj2p-8wj8-pfq4
kubernetes allows nodes to bypass dynamic resource allocation authorization checks
Low Also affects k8s.io/kubernetes
GO-2025-3547
Kubernetes kube-apiserver Vulnerable to Race Condition
Low Also affects k8s.io/kubernetes
GHSA-3wgm-2gw2-vh5m
Kubernetes GitRepo Volume Inadvertent Local Repository Access
Medium Also affects k8s.io/kubernetes
GHSA-vv39-3w5q-974q
Kubernetes allows Command Injection affecting Windows nodes via nodes/*/logs/query API
Medium Also affects k8s.io/kubernetes
GHSA-jgfp-53c3-624w
Node Denial of Service via kubelet Checkpoint API
Medium Also affects k8s.io/kubernetes
GHSA-27wf-5967-98gx
Kubernetes kubelet arbitrary command execution
High Also affects k8s.io/kubernetes
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor