GO-2024-2590 BIT-mattermost-2024-23493 CVE-2024-23493 GHSA-7v3v-984v-h74r
Mattermost leaks details of AD/LDAP groups of a teams in github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server
Medium
Go
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.39%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 33.10% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
- CWE-862 Missing Authorization
- Fix
- Available
- 2 packages have a fixed version
Description
Mattermost leaks details of AD/LDAP groups of a teams in github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server.
NOTE: The source advisory for this report contains additional versions that could not be automatically mapped to standard Go module versions.
(If this is causing false-positive reports from vulnerability scanners, please suggest an edit to the report.)
The additional affected modules and versions are: github.com/mattermost/mattermost/server/v8 before v8.1.9.
Affected versions
Go
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server | >= 9.2.0+incompatible, < 9.2.5+incompatible>= 9.3.0+incompatible, < 9.3.1+incompatible>= 9.4.0+incompatible, < 9.4.2+incompatible |
9.2.5+incompatible9.3.1+incompatible9.4.2+incompatible |
| github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server/v5 | all versions |
No fix yet |
| github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server/v6 | all versions |
No fix yet |
| github.com/mattermost/mattermost/server/v8 | >= 9.4.0, < 9.4.2 |
9.4.2 |
| github.com/mattermost/mattermost/server/v8 | >= 9.3.0, < 9.3.1 |
9.3.1 |
| github.com/mattermost/mattermost/server/v8 | >= 9.2.0, < 9.2.5 |
9.2.5 |
| github.com/mattermost/mattermost/server/v8 | all versions |
No fix yet |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server Go → 9.4.2+incompatible
- go
go get github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server@v9.4.2+incompatible && go mod tidy
github.com/mattermost/mattermost/server/v8 Go → 9.4.2
- go
go get github.com/mattermost/mattermost/server/v8@v9.4.2 && go mod tidy
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- Low
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- None
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
CVSS 3.1 6.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
CWE-862: Missing Authorization
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-xmfh-3ccg-c9fx Mattermost has an Incorrect Authorization issue | Low | Also affects github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server |
| GHSA-h998-hxxj-8q83 Mattermost doesn't invalidate cached authentication state for active WebSocket connections during global session revocation | Medium | Also affects github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server |
| GHSA-g5vr-6pgg-74qv Mattermost doesn't enforce bot-specific permission checks on the user active status endpoint | Low | Also affects github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server |
| GHSA-jqgv-39mg-7c2r Mattermost doesn't authenticate Atlassian Connect installed callbacks, allowing a remote unauthenticated attacker to inject a rogue sharedSecret | Medium | Also affects github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server |
| GHSA-mxq2-5jpg-7474 Mattermost doesn't validate channel ownership of an existing subscription before applying edits | Medium | Also affects github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server |
| GHSA-2g8v-grq3-hq2g Mattermost doesn't enforce administrator authorization on the {{setDefaultInstance}} call within the {{/gitlab connect}} command handler | Medium | Also affects github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server |
| GHSA-6hxm-w4hv-vgvw Mattermost doesn't require role-management authorization when setting the scheme_admin flag on group syncable link and patch endpoints | High | Also affects github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server |
| GHSA-9p44-r552-4wp9 Mattermost doesn't sanitize the Remote Cluster API response on PATCH operations | Medium | Also affects github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor