GHSA-xw98-5q62-jx94 CVE-2026-26999 GO-2026-4594
Traefik: tcp router clears read deadlines before tls forwarding, enabling stalled handshakes (Slowloris DOS)
- Severity
- 7.5 / 10
- High · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.61%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 49.33% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
- Fix
- Available
- 2 packages have a fixed version
Description
Impact
There is a potential vulnerability in Traefik managing TLS handshake on TCP routers.
When Traefik processes a TLS connection on a TCP router, the read deadline used to bound protocol sniffing is cleared before the TLS handshake is completed. When a TLS handshake read error occurs, the code attempts a second handshake with different connection parameters, silently ignoring the initial error. A remote unauthenticated client can exploit this by sending an incomplete TLS record and stopping further data transmission, causing the TLS handshake to stall indefinitely and holding connections open.
By opening many such stalled connections in parallel, an attacker can exhaust file descriptors and goroutines, degrading availability of all services on the affected entrypoint.
Patches
- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.38
- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.9
Workarounds
No workaround available.
For more information
If there are any questions or comments about this advisory, please open an issue.
<details> <summary>Original Description</summary>
Traefik's TCP router uses a connection-level read deadline to bound protocol sniffing (peeking a TLS client hello), but then clears the deadline via conn.SetDeadline(time.Time{}) before delegating the connection to TLS forwarding.
A remote unauthenticated client can send an incomplete TLS record header and stop sending data. After the initial peek times out, the router clears the deadline and the subsequent TLS handshake reads can stall indefinitely, holding connections open and consuming resources.
Expected vs Actual
Expected: if an entrypoint-level read deadline is used to bound initial protocol sniffing, TLS handshake reads should remain bounded by a deadline (either the same deadline is preserved, or a dedicated handshake timeout is enforced).
Actual: after protocol sniffing the router clears the connection deadline and delegates to TLS handling; an attacker can keep the TLS handshake stalled beyond the configured read timeout.
Severity
HIGH CWE: CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption)
Affected Code
- pkg/server/router/tcp/router.go: (*Router).ServeTCP clears the deadline before TLS forwarding
- conn.SetDeadline(time.Time{}) removes the entrypoint-level deadline that previously bounded reads
Root Cause
In (*Router).ServeTCP, after sniffing a TLS client hello, the router removes the connection read deadline:
// Remove read/write deadline and delegate this to underlying TCP server
// (for now only handled by HTTP Server)
if err := conn.SetDeadline(time.Time{}); err != nil {
...
}
TLS handshake reads that happen after this point are not guaranteed to have any deadline, so a client that stops sending bytes can keep the connection open indefinitely.
Attacker Control
Attacker-controlled input is the raw TCP byte stream on an entrypoint that routes to a TLS forwarder. The attacker controls:
- Sending a partial TLS record header (enough to trigger the TLS sniffing path)
- Stopping further sends so the subsequent handshake read blocks
Impact
Each stalled connection occupies file descriptors and goroutines (and may consume additional memory depending on buffering). By opening many such connections in parallel, an attacker can cause resource exhaustion and degrade availability.
Reproduction
Attachments include poc.zip with a self-contained integration harness. It pins the repository commit, applies fix.patch as the control variant, and runs a regression-style test that demonstrates the stall in canonical mode and the timeout in control mode.
Run canonical (vulnerable):
unzip poc.zip -d poc
cd poc
make test
Canonical output excerpt: PROOF_MARKER
Run control (deadline preserved / no stall):
unzip poc.zip -d poc
cd poc
make control
Control output excerpt: NC_MARKER
Recommended Fix
Do not clear the entrypoint-level deadline prior to completing TLS handshake, or enforce a dedicated handshake timeout for the TLS forwarder path.
Fix accepted when: an incomplete TLS record cannot stall past the configured entrypoint-level read deadline (or an explicit handshake timeout), and a regression test covers the canonical/control behavior.
</details>
Affected versions
Go
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/traefik/traefik | all versions |
No fix yet |
| github.com/traefik/traefik/v2 | < 2.11.38 |
2.11.38 |
| github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 | < 3.6.9 |
3.6.9 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
github.com/traefik/traefik/v2 Go → 2.11.38
- go
go get github.com/traefik/traefik/v2@v2.11.38 && go mod tidy
github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 Go → 3.6.9
- go
go get github.com/traefik/traefik/v3@v3.6.9 && go mod tidy
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
- Architecture and Design: Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either: recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, or uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed. The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question. The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
- Implementation: Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
- github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-xw98-5q62-jx94
- github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.38
- github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.9
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10175
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-26999
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
- security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-26999.json
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GO-2026-6558 Traefik: BasicAuth singleflight coalescing reintroduces an unauthenticated username-enumeration timing oracle | Medium | Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik |
| GHSA-f52w-8j3h-j724 Traefik: Rootless HTTP/1 request-target routes as "/" but is forwarded verbatim, bypassing path-scoped routing, middleware guards and access logging | High | Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik |
| GHSA-w4v4-9rw7-5326 Traefik: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') and Incorrect Authorization | Critical | Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik |
| GHSA-qqjf-53cj-pwvv Traefik HTTP/3 Backend NTLM Connection Reuse | Critical | Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik |
| GO-2026-6467 Traefik entrypoint header-name sanitization bypassed via request trailers | High | Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik |
| GHSA-rf44-j88r-hh8c Traefik: ForwardAuth identity spoofing via dot-form header alias | High | Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik |
| GHSA-7ghq-v6jf-g56c Traefik: respondingTimeouts.readTimeout is not applied to HTTP/3, leaving slow-body uploads unbounded | Medium | Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik |
| GHSA-62fc-8686-hfmq Traefik: `allowCrossNamespace=false` bypass via `@kubernetescrd` TraefikService backendRef | Medium | Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor