Skip to content

GHSA-xw5p-hw6r-2j98 CVE-2020-8192

Denial of service in fastify

Medium npm
Severity
Medium
The publisher's own rating, not a CVSS score
Exploit chance (EPSS)
1.16%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 67.08% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Fix
2.15.1
Upgrade fastify to this version or later

Description

A denial of service vulnerability exists in Fastify v2.14.1 and v3.0.0-rc.4 that allows a malicious user to trigger resource exhaustion (when the allErrors option is used) with specially crafted schemas.

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
fastify
< 2.15.1
2.15.1

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

fastify npm → 2.15.1

npm
npm install fastify@2.15.1
yarn
yarn add fastify@2.15.1
pnpm
pnpm add fastify@2.15.1

Weakness

CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
  • Architecture and Design: Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either: recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, or uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed. The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question. The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
  • Implementation: Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-389g-gv7q-r4x8
fastify is vulnerable to header validation bypass via case-sensitive propertyNames
Low Also affects fastify
GHSA-4mh8-r7rc-xpvc
fastify vulnerable to Denial of Service via unhandled exception on HTTP/2 trailer responses
Medium Also affects fastify
GHSA-9q9j-q6p8-xq58
fastify vulnerable to header validation bypass via incomplete schema case normalization
High Also affects fastify
GHSA-667r-xxjv-c9mm
fastify vulnerable to request body replacement via an async validation result collision
High Also affects fastify
GHSA-hwr6-493r-vm6h
fastify vulnerable to request validation bypass via skipped boolean false schemas
High Also affects fastify
GHSA-p68q-wchp-6fh7
fastify vulnerable to authentication bypass via malformed URLs reaching encapsulated not-found handlers
High Also affects fastify
GHSA-w2qp-rph6-63g4
fastify vulnerable to schema validation bypass via root primitive coercion mismatch
Medium Also affects fastify
GHSA-3m5p-2c4r-xxw2
fastify vulnerable to X-Forwarded-* spoofing under trustProxy hop-count
Medium Also affects fastify
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor