Skip to content

GHSA-xvf7-4v9q-58w6 CVE-2022-25851

Infinite loop in jpeg-js

High npm
Severity
7.5 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
1.90%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 79.65% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-835 Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')
Fix
0.4.4
Upgrade jpeg-js to this version or later

Description

The package jpeg-js before 0.4.4 is vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) where a particular piece of input will cause the program to enter an infinite loop and never return.

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
jpeg-js
< 0.4.4
0.4.4

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

jpeg-js npm → 0.4.4

npm
npm install jpeg-js@0.4.4
yarn
yarn add jpeg-js@0.4.4
pnpm
pnpm add jpeg-js@0.4.4

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 7.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')

The product contains an iteration or loop with an exit condition that cannot be reached, i.e., an infinite loop.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-w7q9-p3jq-fmhm
Uncontrolled resource consumption in jpeg-js
Medium Also affects jpeg-js
GHSA-5849-834g-hvw5
pypdf has possible infinite loop when hitting EOF in standard xref table during trailer search
High Same weakness, CWE-835
GHSA-mfr5-77xh-9j7h
pypdf has possible infinite loop when cloning dictionaries
High Same weakness, CWE-835
GHSA-h6cr-wjv9-3cpp
Forge: Denial of Service via infinite loop in BigInteger.modInverse() with negative input (incomplete fix of CVE-2026-33891)
Low Same weakness, CWE-835
GHSA-fw5c-8223-6h42
russh: peer-declared zero maximum packet size permanently stalls channel writes (silent AsyncWrite hang)
Medium Same weakness, CWE-835
EEF-CVE-2026-115269
HTTP/2 WINDOW_UPDATE and SETTINGS frames reset the request body read timeout in Bandit
Not rated yet Same weakness, CWE-835
GHSA-3j72-p6qg-6xp7
Pillow: TarIO negative size field causes infinite CPU-spin loop
Medium Same weakness, CWE-835
GHSA-39mj-jf6j-2qj3
pypdf: Possible infinite loop when hitting EOF in standard xref table
Medium Same weakness, CWE-835
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor