GHSA-xpqm-wm3m-f34h CVE-2026-23890
pnpm scoped bin name Path Traversal allows arbitrary file creation outside node_modules/.bin
- Severity
- 6.5 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.50%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 42.71% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-23 Relative Path Traversal
- Fix
10.28.1- Upgrade pnpm to this version or later
Description
Summary
A path traversal vulnerability in pnpm's bin linking allows malicious npm packages to create executable shims or symlinks outside of node_modules/.bin. Bin names starting with @ bypass validation, and after scope normalization, path traversal sequences like ../../ remain intact.
Details
The vulnerability exists in the bin name validation and normalization logic:
1. Validation Bypass (pkg-manager/package-bins/src/index.ts)
The filter allows any bin name starting with @ to pass through without validation:
.filter((commandName) =>
encodeURIComponent(commandName) === commandName ||
commandName === '' ||
commandName[0] === '@' // <-- Bypasses validation
)
2. Incomplete Normalization (pkg-manager/package-bins/src/index.ts)
function normalizeBinName (name: string): string {
return name[0] === '@' ? name.slice(name.indexOf('/') + 1) : name
}
// Input: @scope/../../evil
// Output: ../../evil <-- Path traversal preserved!
3. Exploitation (pkg-manager/link-bins/src/index.ts:288)
The normalized name is used directly in path.join() without validation.
PoC
- Create a malicious package:
{
"name": "malicious-pkg",
"version": "1.0.0",
"bin": {
"@scope/../../.npmrc": "./malicious.js"
}
}
- Install the package:
pnpm add /path/to/malicious-pkg
- Observe
.npmrccreated in project root (outside node_modules/.bin).
Impact
- All pnpm users who install npm packages
- CI/CD pipelines using pnpm
- Can overwrite config files, scripts, or other sensitive files
Verified on pnpm main @ commit 5a0ed1d45.
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| pnpm | < 10.28.1 |
10.28.1 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
pnpm npm → 10.28.1
- npm
npm install pnpm@10.28.1- yarn
yarn add pnpm@10.28.1- pnpm
pnpm add pnpm@10.28.1
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 6.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-23: Relative Path Traversal
The product uses external input to construct a pathname that should be within a restricted directory, but it does not properly neutralize sequences such as ".." that can resolve to a location that is outside of that directory.
How to prevent it
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When validating filenames, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single "." character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as "/" to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434. Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering "/" is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of "\" as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if "../" sequences are removed from the ".../...//" string in a sequential fashion, two instances of "../" would b
- Implementation: Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked. Use a built-in path canonicalization function (such as realpath() in C) that produces the canonical version of the pathname, which effectively removes ".." sequences and symbolic links (CWE-23, CWE-59). This includes: realpath() in C getCanonicalPath() in Java GetFullPath() in ASP.NET realpath() or abs_path() in Perl realpath() in PHP
- Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-vx52-2968-3vc6 pnpm: Environment secrets exfiltrated via env-placeholder expansion in proxy settings read from an untrusted pnpm-workspace.yaml | High | Also affects pnpm |
| GHSA-2rx9-3g3h-c2jv pnpm: pacquet trust-lockfile install can create dependency symlinks outside the project | High | Also affects pnpm |
| GHSA-vq4v-j7r6-jq4m pnpm: A tarball dependency's manifest `name` escapes node_modules → arbitrary file write/overwrite on install | High | Also affects pnpm |
| GHSA-c59q-g84q-2gj5 pnpm: Virtual store linker path traversal via unvalidated depPath name in lockfileToDepGraph | High | Also affects pnpm |
| GHSA-qrv3-253h-g69c pnpm: Path traversal in configDependencies env lockfile allows symlink creation outside node_modules/.pnpm-config | High | Also affects pnpm |
| GHSA-72r4-9c5j-mj57 pnpm: `patch-remove` could delete project-selected files outside the patches directory | High | Also affects pnpm |
| GHSA-fr4h-3cph-29xv pnpm: Hoisted install imports lockfile alias outside node_modules | High | Also affects pnpm |
| GHSA-v23m-ccfg-pq9h pnpm: `stage download` writes outside its destination directory via manifest name/version traversal | High | Also affects pnpm |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor