Skip to content

GHSA-xhfv-7758-r9hx CVE-2026-75837

Grav: Missing admin.super guard on core group blueprint access field allows admin.users operator to escalate to super-admin

Critical Packagist
Severity
0.0 / 10
Critical · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.49%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 42.46% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management
CWE-862 Missing Authorization
Fix
2.0.14
Upgrade getgrav/grav to this version or later

Description

Summary

The core Flex group blueprint system/blueprints/user/group.yaml (access field, lines 48-55) omits the security@: admin.super field guard that its sibling account blueprint carries (account.yaml:131/138/150, added by the CVE-2026-42613 fix). A delegated non-super operator holding admin.users.update can therefore save a group whose access map contains admin.super: true, which UserGroupObject::authorize then grants to every member of that group, a full privilege escalation to super-admin (scheduler/cron RCE, Twig eval). This is a distinct file, sink, and fix from all four related advisories.

Root Cause

The CVE-2026-42613 fix protected the account access/groups fields with a blueprint-level security@: admin.super gate, which Blueprint::dynamicSecurity() (system/src/Grav/Common/Data/Blueprint.php:644-662) uses to mark a field validate.ignore=true for non-super users so BlueprintSchema::filterArray() (BlueprintSchema.php:263-311) drops it. The functionally-identical group access field, a permission map granted to every member of the group, is declared in system/blueprints/user/group.yaml:48-55 with check_authorize: false and NO security@ guard. check_authorize has ZERO PHP enforcement (grep -rn check_authorize across the repo returns 0 PHP consumers; only two YAML blueprints reference it), so security@ is the sole real control. Because the group access field lacks security@, dynamicSecurity never flags it, filterArray retains it, and Validation::filterArray (type: array, value_type: bool) passes the nested admin.super:true leaf through. The core save path (FlexObject::update() then Framework/Flex/FlexObject.php:683 $blueprint->filter($data,true,true) then save()) persists it to user://config/groups.yaml.

Impact

A delegated admin.users operator (strictly below admin.super) escalates to super-admin, gaining the admin panel, the scheduler (cron to RCE) and Twig evaluation. Full read/write/DoS (C:H/I:H/A:H). Even absent self-escalation, arbitrary rewrite of ANY group's ACL is itself a full escalation primitive.

Proof of Concept

As a non-super admin.users operator who is a member of group ops:

POST /admin/accounts/groups/ops   (or groups.json task:save)
data[access][admin][super]=1

user/config/groups.yaml gains ops: { access: { admin: { super: true } } }, so the operator is super-admin on the next request.

Attack Chain

  1. Entry: authenticated delegated admin (admin.users.update, no admin.super) POSTs the group-edit form for a group they belong to (or a new group), body access[admin][super]=true. Guard: FlexAuthorizeTrait::isAuthorizedAction to admin.users.update. Bypass proof: user-groups.yaml exposes groups at admin.users:crudl; operator legitimately holds update.
  2. Check (field guard): Blueprint::dynamicSecurity marks validate.ignore only for security@ fields. Guard: none on group access (no security@). Bypass proof: group.yaml:48-55 has no security@; git log -S 'security@' -- system/blueprints/user/group.yaml is empty.
  3. Filter: BlueprintSchema::filterArray retains the non-ignored field; Validation::filterArray (value_type: bool) passes admin.super:true through. Bypass proof: field not flagged ignore/disabled; nested bool leaf preserved.
  4. Sink (persist): FlexObject::update then filter then save writes to user://config/groups.yaml. Guard: none. Bypass proof: value already survived steps 2/3; storage performs no ACL filtering.
  5. Impact: any member request triggers UserGroupObject::authorize('admin.super') (.../UserGroups/UserGroupObject.php:75) returning true, so the member is super-admin, enabling scheduler/Twig RCE.

Bypass Evidence

  • system/blueprints/user/group.yaml:48-55: access block with check_authorize: false, no security@ (confirmed live on tag 2.0.12).
  • git log -S 'security@' -- system/blueprints/user/group.yaml is empty (guard never existed; a permanent gap, not a regression).
  • git log 2.0.12..HEAD -- system/blueprints/user/group.yaml is empty (no post-release fix).
  • grep -rn check_authorize (whole repo) returns 0 PHP hits (guard unenforced in PHP).
  • grep -rn "typePermissions|filterPermissions" system/src/Grav/Common/Data returns 0 (permissions map falls through to array-bool filtering that keeps nested keys).
  • Guard asymmetry: account.yaml:131/138/150 carry security@: admin.super; group.yaml carries none. GHSA-h33v-82r9-v8pm's own text confirms the blueprint security@ gate is the sole Flex-backend strip for these keys.

Affected Versions

<= 2.0.12 (latest release; the guard never existed on group.yaml, so all 2.x are affected). The missing guard and the strip logic are both in core getgrav/grav; the group-edit UI is provided by the flex-objects/admin plugin, but the fix belongs in core.

Suggested Fix

Add security@: admin.super to the access field in system/blueprints/user/group.yaml (mirroring account.yaml), and/or enforce a super-only strip on group ACL saves in core so all callers are covered.


Reported by zx (Jace) — GitHub: @manus-use

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
getgrav/grav
< 2.0.14
2.0.14

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

getgrav/grav Packagist → 2.0.14

composer
composer require getgrav/grav:^2.0.14

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
High
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

CVSS 3.1 9.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management

The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
  • Architecture and Design: Follow the principle of least privilege when assigning access rights to entities in a software system.
  • Architecture and Design: Consider following the principle of separation of privilege. Require multiple conditions to be met before permitting access to a system resource.

CWE-862: Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-xjw5-q542-3vmr
Grav: config_denied_paths default list omits `system`, exposing real secrets (e.g. system.cache.redis.password) via the Twig sandbox when config_access is enabled
High Also affects getgrav/grav
GHSA-3jhr-mxmx-38cx
Grav: UserInterface offsetget/offsetexists allow-listed in Twig sandbox let editor-authored content leak hashed_password and 2FA secrets via offsetGet()
Medium Also affects getgrav/grav
GHSA-9ccq-2jfg-qw33
Grav: Origin validation bypass in Uri::referrer() and Pages::referrerRoute() via unanchored prefix match
Critical Also affects getgrav/grav
GHSA-38p6-h87p-r4cg
Grav: Non constant time nonce comparison in Utils::verifyNonce() used for CSRF protection
Medium Also affects getgrav/grav
GHSA-p597-crqc-m349
Grav: The system, site, and theme Twig variables bypass the content sandbox entirely and are never covered by config_denied_paths
Medium Also affects getgrav/grav
GHSA-47ch-6w46-6xm7
Grav: media_directory() Twig function allows filesystem path traversal and file content disclosure from sandboxed page content
Medium Also affects getgrav/grav
GHSA-jq29-c7v8-rg55
Grav: Path Traversal in MediaUploadTrait::deleteFile() Allows Arbitrary File Deletion
High Also affects getgrav/grav
GHSA-8hgv-xc77-jmcr
Grav: Page editors can inject arbitrary script into rendered pages via the Twig sandbox's assets.addJs/addCss allowlist, escalating to super-admin
Medium Also affects getgrav/grav
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor