Skip to content

GHSA-xh32-c9wx-phrp BIT-keycloak-2026-3911 CVE-2026-3911

Keycloak: Information disclosure of disabled user attributes via administrative endpoint

Low Maven
Severity
2.7 / 10
Low · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.35%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 28.15% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-359 Exposure of Private Personal Information to an Unauthorized Actor
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published

Description

A flaw was found in Keycloak. An authenticated user with the view-users role could exploit a vulnerability in the UserResource component. By accessing a specific administrative endpoint, this user could improperly retrieve user attributes that were configured to be hidden. This unauthorized information disclosure could expose sensitive user data.

Affected versions

Maven

PackageVulnerableFixed in
org.keycloak:keycloak-services
<= 26.5.5
No fix yet

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 2.7

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-359: Exposure of Private Personal Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product does not properly prevent a person's private, personal information from being accessed by actors who either (1) are not explicitly authorized to access the information or (2) do not have the implicit consent of the person about whom the information is collected.

How to prevent it
  • Requirements: Identify and consult all relevant regulations for personal privacy. An organization may be required to comply with certain federal and state regulations, depending on its location, the type of business it conducts, and the nature of any private data it handles. Regulations may include Safe Harbor Privacy Framework [REF-340], Gramm-Leach Bliley Act (GLBA) [REF-341], Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) [REF-342], General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) [REF-1047], California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) [REF-1048], and others.
  • Architecture and Design: Carefully evaluate how secure design may interfere with privacy, and vice versa. Security and privacy concerns often seem to compete with each other. From a security perspective, all important operations should be recorded so that any anomalous activity can later be identified. However, when private data is involved, this practice can in fact create risk. Although there are many ways in which private data can be handled unsafely, a common risk stems from misplaced trust. Programmers often trust the operating environment in which a program runs, and therefore believe that it is acceptable store private information on the file system, in the registry, or in other locally-controlled resources. However, even if access to certain resources is restricted, this does not guarantee that the individuals who do have access can be trusted.
  • Implementation, Operation: Some tools can automatically analyze documents to redact, strip, or "sanitize" private information, although some human review might be necessary. Tools may vary in terms of which document formats can be processed. When calling an external program to automatically generate or convert documents, invoke the program with any available options that avoid generating sensitive metadata. Some formats have well-defined fields that could contain private data, such as Exchangeable image file format (Exif), which can contain potentially sensitive metadata such as geolocation, date, and time [REF-1515] [REF-1516].

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-v3f7-2p4r-mwfw
Keycloak vulnerable to cross-site scripting (xss) via case-insensitive uri validation bypass
High Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services
GHSA-9jrw-8xf7-xqhq
Keycloak vulnerable to information disclosure through arbitrary filesystem path probing
Medium Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services
GHSA-w3p3-7cjg-vgfw
Keycloak allows unauthorized access to resources via uma permission ticket bypass
Medium Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services
GHSA-f5p5-6xmx-p252
Keycloak vulnerable to authorization bypass via incorrect uri comparison
High Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services
GHSA-r7rc-c989-86g6
Keycloak: Attacker can re-enable and take over disabled clients via registration access token
Medium Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services
GHSA-4gv3-mc9p-5wqc
Keycloak: Unauthenticated account takeover via reset-credentials flow bypass
Critical Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services
GHSA-6g26-7cx5-mrrg
Keycloak: Information disclosure due to user profile permission bypass
Low Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services
GHSA-cpf7-j4cf-vqx4
Keycloak has an Out-of-bounds Read
Medium Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor