Skip to content

GHSA-x99w-6fgc-pmfw CVE-2026-79657 PYSEC-2026-3735

NLTK: Allowlisted pickle loaders still permit code execution in current source

Critical PyPI
Severity
0.0 / 10
Critical · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
1.27%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 69.77% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-502 Deserialization of Untrusted Data
CWE-693 Protection Mechanism Failure
Fix
3.10.3
Upgrade nltk to this version or later

Description

Summary

The current source tree still allows arbitrary code execution during supposedly safer allowlisted pickle loading. The allowlist trusts whole module namespaces instead of exact safe globals, so crafted pickles can invoke dangerous in-namespace callables through pickle REDUCE.

Details

  • Vulnerability type: Remote code execution via unsafe deserialization
  • Affected component: nltk.picklesec.allowlisted_pickle_load, nltk.tokenize.punkt.punkt_pickle_load, nltk.parse.transitionparser.TransitionParser.parse
  • Affected versions: Current source v3.10.0-rc2; published 3.9.4 was not the claim target for this bypass.
  • Patched versions: Not yet patched
  • Root cause: Module-prefix allowlists include dangerous callables such as nltk.tokenize.repp.ReppTokenizer._execute and numpy.f2py.crackfortran.myeval.

punkt_pickle_load() allowlists both nltk.tokenize.punkt and the whole nltk.tokenize namespace, which exposes ReppTokenizer._execute() and its subprocess.Popen(...) sink during unpickling. TransitionParser.parse() uses allowlisted_pickle_load(..., allowed_modules=("numpy", "scipy", "sklearn")), which permits numpy.f2py.crackfortran.myeval() and its attacker-controlled eval(...) path. I confirmed both gadgets create marker files before the caller returns or later aborts on type misuse.

PoC

Preconditions

  • The application loads an attacker-controlled tokenizer or model artifact through these public loaders.

Steps

  1. Create a pickle whose REDUCE callable is ReppTokenizer._execute and point its command to a harmless marker-file write.
  2. Pass that payload to punkt_pickle_load(BytesIO(payload)) and observe the marker file is created during unpickling.
  3. Create a second pickle whose REDUCE callable is numpy.f2py.crackfortran.myeval and load it through TransitionParser.parse().
  4. Observe the second marker file is created before TransitionParser.parse() later fails on the returned object type.

Minimal reproducible excerpt

{'punkt_marker': 'PUNKT_RCE', 'transitionparser_marker': 'TP_RCE'}

Impact

Any caller that trusts these current allowlisted loaders can still execute attacker-controlled commands while loading model or tokenizer artifacts. This defeats the protection mechanism that replaced unrestricted pickle loading and creates a dangerous false sense of safety.

Remediation

Replace broad module-prefix allowlists with exact (module, qualname) pairs for the few safe classes or functions genuinely required. Do not allow entire namespaces such as nltk.tokenize or numpy, and keep post-load type validation only as a secondary defense.

Resources


Fix + attack demonstration (verified)

  • tightened callers find_class now, before the allowlists:
  1. Rejects any dotted name → closes 4489 with zero legit impact.
  2. Denies dangerous modules (os, subprocess, sys, builtins, numpy.f2py, nltk.tokenize.repp, …) even under a broad allowed_modules — a defense-in-depth backstop so a future too-broad allowlist can't silently reopen RCE.
  3. builtins denied wholesale; safe primitives (int, str, …) must be named exactly via allowed_globals.

Callers tightened: punkt drops the broad nltk.tokenize (keeps nltk.tokenize.punkt + exact collections.defaultdict/builtins.int); transitionparser keeps numpy/scipy/sklearn (array unpickling needs their submodules) with the new guards blocking the gadgets.

Full pickle-sink audit

Every deserialization sink in the tree was reviewed: no raw pickle.load anywhere, and no joblib/numpy/torch/dill/yaml/marshal loaders. data.load + wordnet_app use RestrictedUnpickler (blocks all globals — safe); the remaining pickle_load sites (chartparser_app, tbl/demo) load user-selected or self-written files and keep their warning.

Attack demonstration (captured; fork clone)

=== EXPLOITS blocked ===
  4489 sklearn.os.system (dotted)      -> BLOCKED
  x99w numpy.f2py.crackfortran.myeval  -> BLOCKED
  x99w nltk.tokenize.repp._execute     -> BLOCKED
  backstop os.system (os allowlisted)  -> BLOCKED
  backstop builtins.eval (exact global)-> BLOCKED
=== LEGIT loads still work ===
  punkt round-trip via punkt_pickle_load -> OK
  builtins.int (safe primitive)          -> OK

Tests

test_pickle_allowlist_security.py — added 5 regressions (dotted traversal, both namespace gadgets, denied-module backstop, legit round-trip). Suite: 122 passed / 9 skipped (sklearn-dependent) across pickle/punkt/transition/tokenize. pre-commit (black/isort/ruff) clean.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
nltk
< 3.10.3
3.10.3

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

nltk PyPI → 3.10.3

pip
pip install --upgrade "nltk>=3.10.3"
poetry
poetry add "nltk>=3.10.3"
uv
uv add "nltk>=3.10.3"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
High
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

CVSS 3.1 9.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data

The product deserializes untrusted data without sufficiently ensuring that the resulting data will be valid.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: If available, use the signing/sealing features of the programming language to assure that deserialized data has not been tainted. For example, a hash-based message authentication code (HMAC) could be used to ensure that data has not been modified.
  • Implementation: When deserializing data, populate a new object rather than just deserializing. The result is that the data flows through safe input validation and that the functions are safe.
  • Implementation: Explicitly define a final object() to prevent deserialization.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Make fields transient to protect them from deserialization. An attempt to serialize and then deserialize a class containing transient fields will result in NULLs where the transient data should be. This is an excellent way to prevent time, environment-based, or sensitive variables from being carried over and used improperly.
  • Implementation: Avoid having unnecessary types or gadgets (a sequence of instances and method invocations that can self-execute during the deserialization process, often found in libraries) available that can be leveraged for malicious ends. This limits the potential for unintended or unauthorized types and gadgets to be leveraged by the attacker. Add only acceptable classes to an allowlist. Note: new gadgets are constantly being discovered, so this alone is not a sufficient mitigation.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Employ cryptography of the data or code for protection. However, it's important to note that it would still be client-side security. This is risky because if the client is compromised then the security implemented on the client (the cryptography) can be bypassed.
  • Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].

CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure

The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-j456-xh4h-cpf2
NLTK: WekaClassifier passes an unvalidated caller-controlled model path to the weka JVM, bypassing nltk.pathsec containment
High Also affects nltk
GHSA-ff5c-cp5c-9wjf
NLTK: Uncontrolled resource consumption in RecursiveDescentParser via ambiguous or left-recursive grammars
Medium Also affects nltk
GHSA-f794-5jv7-7672
NLTK: Downloader.download follows hardlinks and overwrites outside-root files
High Also affects nltk
GHSA-8mgp-746c-j5xp
NLTK: Model-artifact APIs bypass pathsec and touch files outside allowed roots
High Also affects nltk
GHSA-8mpw-7fpc-4gqj
NLTK: Pl196xCorpusReader has quadratic ReDoS on malformed TEI blocks
Low Also affects nltk
GHSA-cw6x-m8jw-qmrh
NLTK: Uncontrolled recursion in nltk.featstruct.FeatStructReader causes unhandled RecursionError (DoS) via deeply nested feature-structure input
Medium Also affects nltk
GHSA-vp2x-qp44-57v7
NLTK: Quadratic CPU Exhaustion in `XMLCorpusView._read_xml_fragment()`
Low Also affects nltk
GHSA-ww6m-cw3f-q94g
NLTK: Quadratic-time DoS in PorterStemmer via long runs of 'y'
High Also affects nltk
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor