GHSA-x8rc-wpg4-grpf CVE-2026-70600
Electron: Cross-origin iframe can position native autofill popup
- Severity
- 3.1 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.18%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 7.43% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-1021 Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames
- Fix
39.8.8- Upgrade electron to this version or later
Description
Impact
The native autofill popup could be positioned by a cross-origin iframe outside that iframe's bounds, over the embedding page's UI, enabling clickjacking or spoofing of trusted UI.
Apps are only affected if they embed untrusted content in iframes within windows that also display trusted UI. Apps that do not embed untrusted third-party content are not affected.
Workarounds
Do not embed untrusted content in iframes inside windows that display trusted UI.
Fixed Versions
42.0.0-beta.341.2.140.9.039.8.8
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, email Electron at security@electronjs.org
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| electron | < 39.8.8 |
39.8.8 |
| electron | >= 40.0.0-alpha.1, < 40.9.1 |
40.9.1 |
| electron | >= 41.0.0-alpha.1, < 41.2.1 |
41.2.1 |
| electron | >= 42.0.0-alpha.1, < 42.0.0-beta.3 |
42.0.0-beta.3 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
electron npm → 39.8.8
- npm
npm install electron@39.8.8- yarn
yarn add electron@39.8.8- pnpm
pnpm add electron@39.8.8
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 3.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-1021: Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames
The web application does not restrict or incorrectly restricts frame objects or UI layers that belong to another application or domain.
How to prevent it
- Implementation: The use of X-Frame-Options allows developers of web content to restrict the usage of their application within the form of overlays, frames, or iFrames. The developer can indicate from which domains can frame the content. The concept of X-Frame-Options is well documented, but implementation of this protection mechanism is in development to cover gaps. There is a need for allowing frames from multiple domains.
- Implementation: A developer can use a "frame-breaker" script in each page that should not be framed. This is very helpful for legacy browsers that do not support X-Frame-Options security feature previously mentioned. It is also important to note that this tactic has been circumvented or bypassed. Improper usage of frames can persist in the web application through nested frames. The "frame-breaking" script does not intuitively account for multiple nested frames that can be presented to the user.
- Implementation: This defense-in-depth technique can be used to prevent the improper usage of frames in web applications. It prioritizes the valid sources of data to be loaded into the application through the usage of declarative policies. Based on which implementation of Content Security Policy is in use, the developer should use the "frame-ancestors" directive or the "frame-src" directive to mitigate this weakness. Both directives allow for the placement of restrictions when it comes to allowing embedded content.
- Implementation: In addition to frames or iframes as previously mentioned, the web application is expected to place restrictions on whether it is allowed to be rendered within objects, embed, or applet elements.
References
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-qqvq-6xgj-jw8g Electron affected by libvpx's heap buffer overflow in vp8 encoding | High Known exploited | Also affects electron |
| GHSA-j7hp-h8jx-5ppr libwebp: OOB write in BuildHuffmanTable | High Known exploited | Also affects electron |
| GHSA-995f-9x5r-2rcj Heap buffer overflow in GPU | Critical Known exploited | Also affects electron |
| GHSA-jr5w-w6x2-84p9 Electron: Mitigation for compromised eMudhra intermediate certificates | High | Also affects electron |
| GHSA-h3v5-h239-pg29 Electron: Off-screen rendering on macOS trusts GPU-supplied frame geometry | Low | Also affects electron |
| GHSA-3qxv-5xgr-q7w9 Electron: Frame subscription trusts GPU-supplied frame geometry | Low | Also affects electron |
| GHSA-997q-gvvc-jwmx Electron: openExternal permission requests can be attributed to the wrong origin | Medium | Also affects electron |
| GHSA-fw47-9c62-h3vw Electron: HID and USB permission checks can be attributed to the wrong origin | Medium | Also affects electron |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor