GHSA-x8pv-fgxp-8v3x CVE-2025-47937
TYPO3 Allows Information Disclosure via DBAL Restriction Handling
- Severity
- 3.7 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.30%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 22.92% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
- Fix
9.5.51- Upgrade typo3/cms-core to this version or later
Description
Problem
When performing a database query involving multiple tables through the database abstraction layer (DBAL), frontend user permissions are only applied via FrontendGroupRestriction to the last table. As a result, data from additional tables included in the same query may be unintentionally exposed to unauthorized users.
Solution
Update to TYPO3 versions 9.5.51 ELTS, 10.4.50 ELTS, 11.5.44 ELTS, 12.4.31 LTS, 13.4.12 LTS that fix the problem described.
Credits
Thanks to Christian Futterlieb for reporting this issue, and to TYPO3 security team member Elias Häußler for fixing it.
Affected versions
Packagist
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| typo3/cms-core | >= 9.0.0, < 9.5.51 |
9.5.51 |
| typo3/cms-core | >= 10.0.0, < 10.4.50 |
10.4.50 |
| typo3/cms-core | >= 11.0.0, < 11.5.44 |
11.5.44 |
| typo3/cms-core | >= 12.0.0, < 12.4.31 |
12.4.31 |
| typo3/cms-core | >= 13.0.0, < 13.4.12 |
13.4.12 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
typo3/cms-core Packagist → 9.5.51
- composer
composer require typo3/cms-core:^9.5.51
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 3.7
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-68jx-f42c-7599 TYPO3 CMS - Broken Access Control in Backend and Install Tool | High | Also affects typo3/cms-core |
| GHSA-chm7-4vch-h8vr TYPO3 CMS has Broken Access Control in its Media Module | High | Also affects typo3/cms-core |
| GHSA-jh32-v29g-68pq TYPO3 CMS has Privilege Escalation & SQL Injection in its Form Framework | High | Also affects typo3/cms-core |
| GHSA-c78m-c52x-jgwp TYPO3 CMS has Insecure Deserialization via Core API | Medium | Also affects typo3/cms-core |
| GHSA-jf56-v8jc-jcc5 TYPO3 CMS has Broken Access Control in its File Abstraction Layer | Low | Also affects typo3/cms-core |
| GHSA-2j54-93q2-3hjq TYPO3 CMS has Broken Access Control in Backend API | Medium | Also affects typo3/cms-core |
| GHSA-q93m-25xv-94hh TYPO3 CMS: Broken Access Control in Media Module | Medium | Also affects typo3/cms-core |
| GHSA-qcmw-6rm2-5x78 TYPO3 CMS has Broken Access Control in its DataHandler | Medium | Also affects typo3/cms-core |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor