Skip to content

GHSA-x3qm-p8hr-3c3h CVE-2026-45666 PYSEC-2026-2768

Open WebUI has an Indirect Object Reference (IDOR) in user notes

Medium PyPI
Severity
6.5 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.28%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 20.21% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Fix
0.8.11
Upgrade open-webui to this version or later

Description

Summary

The API /api/v1/notes/{note_id} endpoint lacks proper authorization checks, allowing authenticated users to retrieve notes belonging to other users by guessing or enumerating UUIDs. This results in unauthorized disclosure of potentially sensitive or private user data.

Details

  • if notes is enabled from UI (Settings >> General >> Features >> Notes (Beta))
    • From API, attacker can access other user notes
  • if notes is disabled from UI (Settings >> General >> Features >> Notes (Beta))
    • Then attacker can enable the notes from /api/config and access other user notes

PoC

  • Step 1: Log in to the application as a valid user (User A). image

  • Step 2: Intercept or inspect the response from the endpoint GET /api/config. image

  • Step 3: Observe the field "enable_notes": false in the JSON response.

  • Step 4: Manually change "enable_notes" to true using browser DevTools or by intercepting and modifying the response via a proxy like Burp Suite. (Please note, the occurrence of this API comes twice, hence modification needs to be made twice as well.) image

  • Step 5: Observe the loaded frontend application; the previously hidden notes form will now be visible. image

image

  • Step 6: Again, click on any note, intercept the request, and Replace the note_id in the URL with a different note ID known to belong to another user (e.g., by guessing or bruteforcing).
  • Step 7: Send the modified request while remaining logged in as User A.
  • Step 8: Observe that the server returns the content of another user's note, confirming unauthorized access. image image

Impact

  1. Unauthorized access to user-created notes
  2. Possible exposure of confidential or sensitive uploaded data
  3. Violation of user privacy and data isolation
  4. High risk of legal or compliance breaches in regulated environments

Resolution

Fixed in commit de3317e26, first released in v0.8.11 (Mar 2026). All per-id note endpoints (GET /api/v1/notes/{id}, POST /api/v1/notes/{id}/update, POST /api/v1/notes/{id}/access/update, deletion) now enforce ownership: the handler fetches the note, then requires the caller to be admin, the note owner, or have an AccessGrants grant for the appropriate permission (read for retrieval, write for mutation). A non-owner with no grant receives 403.

Users on >= 0.8.11 are not affected.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
open-webui
< 0.8.11
0.8.11

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

open-webui PyPI → 0.8.11

pip
pip install --upgrade "open-webui>=0.8.11"
poetry
poetry add "open-webui>=0.8.11"
uv
uv add "open-webui>=0.8.11"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
  • Architecture and Design: Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-wvm9-9g5j-623f
Open WebUI: Users denied by the OAuth role policy can still sign in via token exchange
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-4qg5-cxx4-g927
Open WebUI: Users denied by the OAuth domain allowlist or role policy can still sign in via token exchange
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-jqhh-cjmq-vmv6
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can hang the server via a cyclic chat message history
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-5x7x-4c3c-qf5w
Open WebUI: Server-side fetches reach blocked and internal hosts via unvalidated HTTP redirect targets
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-3cgp-3cqx-j8w2
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can hang the server via message deletion in a cyclic chat tree
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-34r3-9m95-vq73
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can reach the Azure platform channel via server-side web fetch
High Also affects open-webui
GHSA-2724-6cpj-gf3v
Open WebUI: Non-admin users can delete admin-owned external knowledge connections via knowledge base deletion
High Also affects open-webui
GHSA-3pf7-q2g3-wj28
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can inject chats into another user's folder via chat completions
Medium Also affects open-webui
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor