GHSA-wxw3-q3m9-c3jr CVE-2026-67335
Better Auth: OAuth callback accepts mismatched `state` when cookie-backed state storage is used without PKCE
- Severity
- 6.0 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.28%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 20.88% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-287 Improper Authentication
- CWE-345 Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
- CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
- Fix
1.6.2- Upgrade better-auth to this version or later
Description
Am I affected?
Users are affected if all of the following are true:
- The application uses
better-authat a version below1.6.2(or@better-auth/ssopaired with such a version). betterAuth({ account: { storeStateStrategy } })is set to"cookie". The default"database"is not affected.- The application wires at least one OAuth provider through
genericOAuth({ config })withpkce: false, or it supplies a customgetTokenortokenUrlthat does not require the storedcodeVerifier. Stock social providers with PKCE on are not affected. - The provider returns arbitrary
codevalues to the configured callback URL.
If users are on better-auth@1.6.2 or later, they are not affected.
Fix:
- Upgrade to
better-auth@1.6.2or later (current stable is1.6.10). - If users cannot upgrade, see workarounds below.
Summary
In parseGenericState, the cookie branch decrypted the oauth_state cookie and validated expiry, but did not compare the incoming OAuth state query parameter to the nonce that generateGenericState issued at sign-in. Any callback to /api/auth/oauth2/callback/<providerId> that arrived with a forged state and any code was therefore accepted as long as the browser still held a live oauth_state cookie. With pkce: false (or any getToken path that does not enforce a code-verifier round-trip), an attacker who forced the victim to deliver an attacker-controlled authorization code to the callback would mint a session bound to the attacker's external identity in the victim's browser. Account-linking flows behaved the same way, binding the attacker's external account to an authenticated victim row.
Details
The cookie branch of parseGenericState did not compare the cookie's stored nonce to the incoming state parameter. The database branch (the default) was not affected because the verification row is keyed by state and the lookup itself enforces equality.
The fix re-binds the cookie to the nonce: generateGenericState writes oauthState: state into the encrypted payload before storage, and parseGenericState rejects when parsedData.oauthState !== state. The same primitive covers every caller (generic-oauth, social, account-link, oauth-proxy passthrough, OIDC SSO, SAML relay state).
Patches
Fixed in better-auth@1.6.2 via PR #8949 (commit 9deb7936a, merged 2026-04-09). The cookie branch of parseGenericState now rejects when the encrypted payload's nonce does not match the incoming state parameter; the database branch gained a defense-in-depth equality check.
Workarounds
If users cannot upgrade immediately:
- Switch
storeStateStrategyback to"database"(the default). This closes the cookie-only bypass without a code change. - Enable
pkce: trueon every affectedgenericOAuthprovider. ThecodeVerifieris the missing primitive that the attacker cannot supply.
Impact
- Forced-login (CSRF on OAuth callback): the attacker forces the victim's browser into an authenticated session bound to the attacker's external identity, allowing the attacker to observe the victim's actions inside the application.
- Persistent account linking: account-link flows bind the attacker's external account to the victim's authenticated row, granting persistent access until the link is removed.
Credit
Reported by @Jvr2022 via private advisory disclosure, and by @alavesa (PatchPilots audit) via the public duplicate issue #8897.
Resources
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| better-auth | < 1.6.2 |
1.6.2 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
better-auth npm → 1.6.2
- npm
npm install better-auth@1.6.2- yarn
yarn add better-auth@1.6.2- pnpm
pnpm add better-auth@1.6.2
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 6.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Attack requirements
- Present
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Passive
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- None
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- High
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
- Exploit maturity
- Not defined
- Scope
- X
CVSS 3.1 5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-287: Improper Authentication
When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Use an authentication framework or library such as the OWASP ESAPI Authentication feature.
CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
The product does not sufficiently verify the origin or authenticity of data, in a way that causes it to accept invalid data.
CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330] Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
- Implementation: Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
- Architecture and Design: Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
- Architecture and Design: Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
- Architecture and Design: Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller: When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same. Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult. This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
- Architecture and Design: Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
- Implementation: Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
References
Packages
Other links
- github.com/better-auth/better-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-wxw3-q3m9-c3jr
- github.com/better-auth/better-auth/issues/8897
- github.com/better-auth/better-auth/pull/8949
- github.com/better-auth/better-auth/commit/9deb7936aba7931f2db4b460141f476508f11bfd
- vulncheck.com/advisories/better-auth-before-oauth-state-validation-bypass
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-r4xp-prcw-77qf better-auth: OAuth Proxy lets an attacker sign in as another user | Critical | Also affects better-auth |
| GHSA-965c-763c-88jm better-auth: OAuth state can be used as a Magic Link to sign in as another user | Critical | Also affects better-auth |
| GHSA-44jh-23m7-hpcf @better-auth/drizzle-adapter: Concurrent requests can exceed rate limits on PostgreSQL | Medium | Also affects better-auth |
| GHSA-q84f-53jg-9ppm better-auth: Device login approval does not show the requesting client or permissions | High | Also affects better-auth |
| GHSA-qq9h-g4jm-xgf3 Better Auth: Account takeover via pre-account hijacking on magic-link and email-OTP sign-in | High | Also affects better-auth |
| GHSA-2vg6-77g8-24mp Better Auth: Stale sessions persist after user deletion across admin, anonymous, and SCIM flows | Medium | Also affects better-auth |
| GHSA-7w99-5wm4-3g79 @better-auth/oauth-provider's OAuth authorization-code grant allows concurrent redemption when two token requests race the find-then-delete primitive | High | Also affects better-auth |
| GHSA-392p-2q2v-4372 Better Auth: OAuth refresh-token rotation forks the token family on concurrent redemption | High | Also affects better-auth |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor