Skip to content

GHSA-wr62-c79q-cv37 BIT-tomcat-2025-52520 CVE-2025-52520

Apache Tomcat Catalina is vulnerable to DoS attack through bypassing of size limits

High Maven
Severity
7.5 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
2.20%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 82.50% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-190 Integer Overflow or Wraparound
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

For some unlikely configurations of multipart upload, an Integer Overflow vulnerability in Apache Tomcat could lead to a DoS via bypassing of size limits.

This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.8, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.42, from 9.0.0.M1 through 9.0.106. The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are known to be affected: 8.5.0 through 8.5.100. Other, older, EOL versions may also be affected.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.9, 10.1.43 or 9.0.107, which fix the issue.

Affected versions

Maven

PackageVulnerableFixed in
org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
>= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.9
11.0.9
org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
>= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.43
10.1.43
org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
>= 9.0.0.M1, < 9.0.107
9.0.107
org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
>= 8.5.0, <= 8.5.100
No fix yet
org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina
>= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.9
11.0.9
org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina
>= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.43
10.1.43
org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina
>= 9.0.0.M1, < 9.0.107
9.0.107
org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina
>= 8.5.0, <= 8.5.100
No fix yet

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core Maven → 11.0.9

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.apache.tomcat.embed</groupId><artifactId>tomcat-embed-core</artifactId><version>11.0.9</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core:11.0.9")

org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina Maven → 11.0.9

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.apache.tomcat</groupId><artifactId>tomcat-catalina</artifactId><version>11.0.9</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina:11.0.9")

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 7.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How to prevent it
  • Requirements: Ensure that all protocols are strictly defined, such that all out-of-bounds behavior can be identified simply, and require strict conformance to the protocol.
  • Requirements: Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. If possible, choose a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Use libraries or frameworks that make it easier to handle numbers without unexpected consequences. Examples include safe integer handling packages such as SafeInt (C++) or IntegerLib (C or C++). [REF-106]
  • Implementation: Perform input validation on any numeric input by ensuring that it is within the expected range. Enforce that the input meets both the minimum and maximum requirements for the expected range. Use unsigned integers where possible. This makes it easier to perform validation for integer overflows. When signed integers are required, ensure that the range check includes minimum values as well as maximum values.
  • Implementation: Understand the programming language's underlying representation and how it interacts with numeric calculation (CWE-681). Pay close attention to byte size discrepancies, precision, signed/unsigned distinctions, truncation, conversion and casting between types, "not-a-number" calculations, and how the language handles numbers that are too large or too small for its underlying representation. [REF-7] Also be careful to account for 32-bit, 64-bit, and other potential differences that may affect the numeric representation.
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Implementation: Examine compiler warnings closely and eliminate problems with potential security implications, such as signed / unsigned mismatch in memory operations, or use of uninitialized variables. Even if the weakness is rarely exploitable, a single failure may lead to the compromise of the entire system.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-83qj-6fr2-vhqg
Apache Tomcat: Potential RCE and/or information disclosure and/or information corruption with partial PUT
Critical Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-qppj-fm5r-hxr3
HTTP/2 Stream Cancellation Attack
Medium Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-xjgh-84hx-56c5
Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type Apache Tomcat
High Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-cw54-59pw-4g8c
Apache Tomcat Improper Access Control vulnerability
Critical Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina
CVE-2020-1938
Improper Privilege Management in Tomcat
Critical Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-pjfr-qf3p-3q25
When running Apache Tomcat on Windows with HTTP PUTs enabled it was possible to upload a JSP file to the server
High Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-h3x4-894j-xpx5
Apache Tomcat's FORM authentication process has an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability
Critical Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-9xv2-5v5q-p794
Apache Tomcat's DIGEST authenticator has an Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay vulnerability
Critical Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor