Skip to content

GHSA-wp4h-pvgw-5727 CVE-2019-0230

Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes in Apache Struts

Critical Maven
Severity
9.8 / 10
Critical · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
96.95%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 99.89% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-1321 Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')
CWE-915 Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes
Fix
2.5.22
Upgrade org.apache.struts:struts2-core to this version or later

Description

Apache Struts 2.0.0 to 2.5.20 forced double OGNL evaluation, when evaluated on raw user input in tag attributes, may lead to remote code execution.

Affected versions

Maven

PackageVulnerableFixed in
org.apache.struts:struts2-core
>= 2.0.0, < 2.5.22
2.5.22

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

org.apache.struts:struts2-core Maven → 2.5.22

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.apache.struts</groupId><artifactId>struts2-core</artifactId><version>2.5.22</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.apache.struts:struts2-core:2.5.22")

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 9.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')

The product receives input from an upstream component that specifies attributes that are to be initialized or updated in an object, but it does not properly control modifications of attributes of the object prototype.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: By freezing the object prototype first (for example, Object.freeze(Object.prototype)), modification of the prototype becomes impossible.
  • Architecture and Design: By blocking modifications of attributes that resolve to object prototype, such as proto or prototype, this weakness can be mitigated.
  • Implementation: When handling untrusted objects, validating using a schema can be used.
  • Implementation: By using an object without prototypes (via Object.create(null) ), adding object prototype attributes by accessing the prototype via the special attributes becomes impossible, mitigating this weakness.
  • Implementation: Map can be used instead of objects in most cases. If Map methods are used instead of object attributes, it is not possible to access the object prototype or modify it.

CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes

The product receives input from an upstream component that specifies multiple attributes, properties, or fields that are to be initialized or updated in an object, but it does not properly control which attributes can be modified.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: If available, use features of the language or framework that allow specification of allowlists of attributes or fields that are allowed to be modified. If possible, prefer allowlists over denylists. For applications written with Ruby on Rails, use the attr_accessible (allowlist) or attr_protected (denylist) macros in each class that may be used in mass assignment.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: If available, use the signing/sealing features of the programming language to assure that deserialized data has not been tainted. For example, a hash-based message authentication code (HMAC) could be used to ensure that data has not been modified.
  • Implementation: For any externally-influenced input, check the input against an allowlist of internal object attributes or fields that are allowed to be modified.
  • Implementation, Architecture and Design: Refactor the code so that object attributes or fields do not need to be dynamically identified, and only expose getter/setter functionality for the intended attributes.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-8c6j-ffmf-q6vm
Apache Struts RCE Vulnerability
High Known exploited Also affects org.apache.struts:struts2-core
GHSA-47qp-8v9g-39hp
Code injection in Apache Struts
Critical Known exploited Also affects org.apache.struts:struts2-core
GHSA-4wrr-9h5r-m92w
Apache Struts Remote Java Code Execution
Critical Known exploited Also affects org.apache.struts:struts2-core
CVE-2020-17530
Remote code execution in Apache Struts
Critical Known exploited Also affects org.apache.struts:struts2-core
GHSA-j77q-2qqg-6989
Apache Struts vulnerable to remote arbitrary command execution due to improper input validation
Critical Known exploited Also affects org.apache.struts:struts2-core
CVE-2018-11776
Apache Struts vulnerable to remote command execution (RCE) due to improper input validation
High Known exploited Also affects org.apache.struts:struts2-core
GHSA-qcfc-hmrc-59x7
Apache Struts 2 is Missing XML Validation
High Also affects org.apache.struts:struts2-core
GHSA-rg58-xhh7-mqjw
Apache Struts has a Denial of Service vulnerability
High Also affects org.apache.struts:struts2-core
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor