Skip to content

GHSA-wmwf-9ccg-fff5 BIT-tomcat-2025-55752 CVE-2025-55752

Apache Tomcat Vulnerable to Relative Path Traversal

High Maven
Severity
0.0 / 10
High · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
64.41%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 99.24% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-23 Relative Path Traversal
Fix
Available
3 packages have a fixed version

Description

The fix for bug 60013 introduced a regression where the rewritten URL was normalized before it was decoded. This introduced the possibility that, for rewrite rules that rewrite query parameters to the URL, an attacker could manipulate the request URI to bypass security constraints including the protection for /WEB-INF/ and /META-INF/. If PUT requests were also enabled then malicious files could be uploaded leading to remote code execution. PUT requests are normally limited to trusted users and it is considered unlikely that PUT requests would be enabled in conjunction with a rewrite that manipulated the URI.

This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.10, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.44, from 9.0.0.M11 through 9.0.108.

The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are known to be affected: 8.5.6 though 8.5.100. Other, older, EOL versions may also be affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.11 or later, 10.1.45 or later or 9.0.109 or later, which fix the issue.

Affected versions

Maven

PackageVulnerableFixed in
org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
>= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.11
11.0.11
org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
>= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.45
10.1.45
org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
>= 9.0.0-M11, < 9.0.109
9.0.109
org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
>= 8.5.6, <= 8.5.100
No fix yet
org.apache.tomcat:tomcat
>= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.11
11.0.11
org.apache.tomcat:tomcat
>= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.45
10.1.45
org.apache.tomcat:tomcat
>= 9.0.0-M11, < 9.0.109
9.0.109
org.apache.tomcat:tomcat
>= 8.5.6, <= 8.5.100
No fix yet
org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina
>= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.11
11.0.11
org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina
>= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.45
10.1.45
org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina
>= 9.0.0-M11, < 9.0.109
9.0.109
org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina
>= 8.5.6, <= 8.5.100
No fix yet

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core Maven → 11.0.11

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.apache.tomcat.embed</groupId><artifactId>tomcat-embed-core</artifactId><version>11.0.11</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core:11.0.11")

org.apache.tomcat:tomcat Maven → 11.0.11

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.apache.tomcat</groupId><artifactId>tomcat</artifactId><version>11.0.11</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.apache.tomcat:tomcat:11.0.11")

org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina Maven → 11.0.11

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.apache.tomcat</groupId><artifactId>tomcat-catalina</artifactId><version>11.0.11</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina:11.0.11")

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
Present
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
High
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

CVSS 3.1 7.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-23: Relative Path Traversal

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that should be within a restricted directory, but it does not properly neutralize sequences such as ".." that can resolve to a location that is outside of that directory.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When validating filenames, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single "." character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as "/" to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434. Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering "/" is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of "\" as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if "../" sequences are removed from the ".../...//" string in a sequential fashion, two instances of "../" would b
  • Implementation: Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked. Use a built-in path canonicalization function (such as realpath() in C) that produces the canonical version of the pathname, which effectively removes ".." sequences and symbolic links (CWE-23, CWE-59). This includes: realpath() in C getCanonicalPath() in Java GetFullPath() in ASP.NET realpath() or abs_path() in Perl realpath() in PHP
  • Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-69r9-qgr7-g2wj
Apache Tomcat Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data vulnerability
High Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat:tomcat
GHSA-83qj-6fr2-vhqg
Apache Tomcat: Potential RCE and/or information disclosure and/or information corruption with partial PUT
Critical Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-qppj-fm5r-hxr3
HTTP/2 Stream Cancellation Attack
Medium Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-xjgh-84hx-56c5
Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type Apache Tomcat
High Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-cw54-59pw-4g8c
Apache Tomcat Improper Access Control vulnerability
Critical Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina
CVE-2020-1938
Improper Privilege Management in Tomcat
Critical Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-pjfr-qf3p-3q25
When running Apache Tomcat on Windows with HTTP PUTs enabled it was possible to upload a JSP file to the server
High Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-h3x4-894j-xpx5
Apache Tomcat's FORM authentication process has an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability
Critical Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor