Skip to content

GHSA-wh8p-h9hw-x2mc CVE-2026-35344

uutils coreutils has an Unchecked Return Value Issue

Low crates.io
Severity
3.3 / 10
Low · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.11%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 1.55% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-252 Unchecked Return Value
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published

Description

The dd utility in uutils coreutils suppresses errors during file truncation operations by unconditionally calling Result::ok() on truncation attempts. While intended to mimic GNU behavior for special files like /dev/null, the uutils implementation also hides failures on regular files and directories caused by full disks or read-only file systems. This can lead to silent data corruption in backup or migration scripts, as the utility may report a successful operation even when the destination file contains old or garbage data.

Affected versions

crates.io

PackageVulnerableFixed in
coreutils
<= 0.8.0
No fix yet

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 3.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-252: Unchecked Return Value

The product does not check the return value from a method or function, which can prevent it from detecting unexpected states and conditions.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Check the results of all functions that return a value and verify that the value is expected.
  • Implementation: For any pointers that could have been modified or provided from a function that can return NULL, check the pointer for NULL before use. When working with a multithreaded or otherwise asynchronous environment, ensure that proper locking APIs are used to lock before the check, and unlock when it has finished [REF-1484].
  • Implementation: Ensure that you account for all possible return values from the function.
  • Implementation: When designing a function, make sure you return a value or throw an exception in case of an error.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-m2pg-c7m6-77pj
uutils coreutils has an Improper Input Validation Issue in its cut Utility
Medium Also affects coreutils
GHSA-fhr3-xh3q-69w6
uutils coreutils has an Incorrect Provision of Specified Functionality Issue
Low Also affects coreutils
GHSA-5pv5-xh52-hvrp
uutils coreutils has an Incorrect Short Circuit Evaluation Issue
Low Also affects coreutils
GHSA-5v4g-vw9x-h534
uutils coreutils has an Improper Input Validation Issue in its env Utility
Low Also affects coreutils
GHSA-6g8r-74qp-6859
uutils coreutils has a Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition
Medium Also affects coreutils
GHSA-vx9m-xjwf-8cqm
uutils coreutils has an Improper Handling of Unicode Encoding Issue
Low Also affects coreutils
GHSA-4wrp-79m8-9m9p
uutils coreutils has a Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition
Medium Also affects coreutils
GHSA-wq63-vh5h-pr5p
uutils coreutils has a UNIX Symbolic Link (Symlink) Following issue
Medium Also affects coreutils
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor