Skip to content

GHSA-wfc6-r584-vfw7 CVE-2026-44576

Next.js vulnerable to cache poisoning in React Server Component responses

Medium npm
Severity
5.4 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.29%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 22.13% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-436 Interpretation Conflict
Fix
15.5.16
Upgrade next to this version or later

Description

Impact

Applications using React Server Components can be vulnerable to cache poisoning when shared caches do not correctly partition response variants. Under affected conditions, an attacker can cause an RSC response to be served from the original URL and poison shared cache entries so later visitors receive component payloads instead of the expected HTML.

Fix

We now validate and interpret RSC request headers consistently across request classification and rendering, and we enforce the intended cache-busting behavior so RSC payloads are not unexpectedly served from the original URL.

Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade immediately, ensure your CDN or reverse proxy keys on the relevant RSC request headers and honors Vary, or disable shared caching for affected App Router and RSC responses.

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
next
>= 14.2.0, < 15.5.16
15.5.16
next
>= 16.0.0, < 16.2.5
16.2.5

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

next npm → 15.5.16

npm
npm install next@15.5.16
yarn
yarn add next@15.5.16
pnpm
pnpm add next@15.5.16

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.4

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:L

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

Weakness

CWE-436: Interpretation Conflict

Product A handles inputs or steps differently than Product B, which causes A to perform incorrect actions based on its perception of B's state.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-673q-mjm6-r5xr
Next.js: Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in `use cache` functions returning typed arrays
Critical Also affects next
GHSA-2464-fhr4-w9xw
Next.js: Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in Image Optimization API when SVG files are used
Critical Also affects next
GHSA-p3m5-59mp-jv5r
Next.js: Denial of Service in App Router using Server Actions
High Also affects next
GHSA-3w37-wq28-93x7
Next.js: Pending `use cache` fill can leak Draft Mode content into regular responses and persisted pages
Medium Also affects next
GHSA-4jqv-mc3x-m676
Next.js has cache poisoning of SSG and ISR pages in self-hosted applications
Medium Also affects next
GHSA-39w2-rjm5-chcv
Next.js has information disclosure in development server's Model Context Protocol endpoint
Medium Also affects next
GHSA-f87g-xv8r-7p7x
Next.js has information disclosure in App Router metadata image routes via dynamicParams bypass
Medium Also affects next
GHSA-mcj8-r9mp-w47p
Next.js has cache poisoning in SSG/ISR rendering that leads to cross-user content substitution and persistent denial of service
Medium Also affects next
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor