Skip to content

GHSA-w2cx-738m-mc7w CVE-2026-102273 PYSEC-2026-4151

PyJWT accepts public JWK containers as HMAC secrets

High PyPI
Severity
7.4 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.18%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 6.93% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-347 Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Fix
2.14.0
Upgrade pyjwt to this version or later

Description

Summary

PyJWT 2.13.0 contains an incomplete defense against algorithm confusion when an application mixes symmetric and asymmetric algorithms in one verification path. A public RSA, EC, or OKP JWK can be accepted as an HMAC secret when it is wrapped in a JWKS object, nested in an array, or represented in another container form that does not expose a top-level kty member.

Impact

An attacker who knows the public key material can forge HS256/HS384/HS512 tokens if the application simultaneously:

  • allows both HS* and asymmetric algorithms;
  • passes raw public JWK/JWKS JSON as key=; and
  • uses that same value as the HMAC secret.

This can allow forged JWT claims in affected application configurations. The issue does not affect applications that keep symmetric and asymmetric verification paths separate and follow PyJWT's algorithm-selection guidance.

Fix status

The fix is on master in commit 801cd12 (fix: reject public JWK container HMAC keys). HMACAlgorithm.prepare_key now rejects public JWK members found in objects, arrays, nested containers, BOM/UTF variants, and recursion-limit inputs. It also recognizes escaped JSON member names without treating ordinary string values as JWKs. Ordinary JSON secrets remain accepted byte-for-byte.

The change was tested with focused regression tests and the full local tox matrix. Available Python 3.9, 3.12, and 3.13 crypto/no-crypto suites, mypy, package metadata, and coverage passed; unavailable interpreters were skipped by the project configuration. A fresh independent Astra/max security review accepted the final diff with no blocking findings.

The affected range is = 2.13.0. The fix is on the unreleased development branch; the patched version will be recorded when a released 2.x version containing the fix is available. This advisory is being moved to draft pending that release.

Reporter credit

Credit: Charles Vosburgh / Trilobyte.

Original report

The original report and reproduction package are retained in the private advisory record.

Maintainer update — 2026-09-11

The verified fix for this advisory is included in PyJWT 2.14.0, released on 2026-09-11 and available on PyPI. PyJWT 2.14.0 is the first release containing the fix. This advisory is now published with 2.14.0 recorded as the patched version.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
pyjwt
>= 2.13.0, < 2.14.0
2.14.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

pyjwt PyPI → 2.14.0

pip
pip install --upgrade "pyjwt>=2.14.0"
poetry
poetry add "pyjwt>=2.14.0"
uv
uv add "pyjwt>=2.14.0"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 7.4

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

The product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-pxh4-856f-4h89
PyJWT: HS256/384/512 verify accepts empty HMAC key via oct JWK (PyJWK/PyJWKClient) enabling token forgery
High Also affects pyjwt
GHSA-gvp8-978c-rx2q
PyJWT.decode() reintroduces options-dict mutation, enabling silent claim-verification bypass on dict reuse
Medium Also affects pyjwt
GHSA-x33g-cr3x-6449
PyJWT accepts inconsistent OKP x/d JWKs, causing public/private key identity confusion
High Also affects pyjwt
GHSA-w6j9-cwv2-h6wq
PyJWT: Malformed RSA JWK aborts parsing of an entire JWK Set
High Also affects pyjwt
GHSA-r6x4-923q-g947
PyJWT BOM Bypass
High Also affects pyjwt
GHSA-p4g4-x82p-q773
PyJWT: Public keys in DER form are accepted as HMAC secrets, bypassing the CVE-2022-29217 guard
High Also affects pyjwt
GHSA-jwrc-g2q2-pq5p
PyJWT: ReDoS vulnerability when calling the `is_pem_format` function.
Medium Also affects pyjwt
GHSA-hxm8-2xgr-2p9m
PyJWT: Non-canonical signature segments enable raw-token revocation bypass
Medium Also affects pyjwt
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor