Skip to content

GHSA-vvjh-f6p9-5vcf CVE-2026-3690

OpenClaw Canvas Authentication Bypass Vulnerability

High npm
Severity
7.4 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.67%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 52.04% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-291 Reliance on IP Address for Authentication
Fix
2026.2.19
Upgrade openclaw to this version or later

Description

ZDI-CAN-29311: OpenClaw Canvas Authentication Bypass Vulnerability

-- ABSTRACT -------------------------------------

Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative has identified a vulnerability affecting the following products: OpenClaw - OpenClaw

-- VULNERABILITY DETAILS ------------------------

  • Version tested: openclaw 2026.2.17
  • Platform tested: macOS 26.3

Analysis

Description

The OpenClaw gateway's authorizeCanvasRequest() function implements an IP-based authentication fallback for canvas endpoints (/__openclaw__/a2ui/, /__openclaw__/canvas/, /__openclaw__/ws). When a WebSocket client authenticates from a private IP address, ALL subsequent HTTP requests from that same IP are granted canvas access without requiring their own authentication token.

In environments where multiple clients share a single IP address ��� corporate NAT, VPN concentrators, Kubernetes clusters, Docker host-mode networking ��� an unauthenticated attacker on the same network is granted full canvas access by virtue of sharing an IP with a legitimate authenticated client.

Root Cause

Three functions in src/gateway/server-http.ts create this vulnerability:

1. IP-matching function (line ~100)

function hasAuthorizedWsClientForIp(clients: Set<GatewayWsClient>, clientIp: string): boolean {
  for (const client of clients) {
    if (client.clientIp && client.clientIp === clientIp) {
      return true;
    }
  }
  return false;
}

This function checks if ANY connected WebSocket client shares the same IP. It does not verify that the HTTP request belongs to the same user, session, or browser as the WS client.

2. IP-based fallback in authorizeCanvasRequest (line ~109)

async function authorizeCanvasRequest(params: { ... }): Promise<GatewayAuthResult> {
  // ... token check first ...

  const clientIp = resolveGatewayClientIp({ ... });

  // Only allow fallback for private/loopback addresses
  if (!isPrivateOrLoopbackAddress(clientIp)) {
    return lastAuthFailure ?? { ok: false, reason: "unauthorized" };
  }

  // THE VULNERABILITY: grants access based on IP alone
  if (hasAuthorizedWsClientForIp(clients, clientIp)) {
    return { ok: true };
  }

  return lastAuthFailure ?? { ok: false, reason: "unauthorized" };
}

If the HTTP request comes from a private IP that matches any authenticated WS client, access is granted without verifying the request's own credentials.

3. Canvas path routing

function isCanvasPath(pathname: string): boolean {
  return (
    pathname === A2UI_PATH ||              // /__openclaw__/a2ui
    pathname.startsWith(`${A2UI_PATH}/`) ||
    pathname === CANVAS_HOST_PATH ||        // /__openclaw__/canvas
    pathname.startsWith(`${CANVAS_HOST_PATH}/`) ||
    pathname === CANVAS_WS_PATH            // /__openclaw__/ws
  );
}

All canvas endpoints use this weaker authentication path instead of the standard authorizeGatewayConnect() which requires a valid token.

Attack Scenario

Corporate NAT Environment

  1. A company runs an OpenClaw gateway on an internal server with --bind lan and a token for authentication.
  2. Developer Alice connects her OpenClaw desktop app via WebSocket using her valid token. The gateway records her IP as the corporate NAT address (e.g., 10.0.0.1).
  3. Attacker Bob, on the same corporate network, also appears as 10.0.0.1 to the gateway (NAT).
  4. Bob sends an HTTP request to http://gateway:18789/__openclaw__/a2ui/ with NO authentication header.
  5. authorizeCanvasRequest() checks: Is 10.0.0.1 a private IP? Yes. Is there a WS client from 10.0.0.1? Yes (Alice). Access granted.
  6. Bob now has full access to all canvas endpoints ��� the A2UI interface, canvas content, and the canvas WebSocket ��� without ever authenticating.

Kubernetes / Docker Environments

In containerized deployments using shared networking (host mode, pod networking), multiple containers share the same IP. One container's authentication enables canvas access for all containers on that IP.

Reproduction Steps

Prerequisites

  • Docker installed
  • Python 3
  • OpenClaw Docker image built as openclaw:local

Steps

  1. Navigate to the PoC directory and start the environment:

    cd vulnerabilities/04-canvas-ip-auth-bypass
    docker compose up -d --wait
    
  2. This starts two containers on a shared Docker network:

    • Gateway (172.28.0.10): Token-protected OpenClaw gateway
    • Legitimate client (172.28.0.20): Connects via WebSocket with valid token, establishing IP trust
  3. Wait a few seconds for the legitimate client to authenticate, then run the PoC:

    python3 poc.py
    
  4. The PoC runs three tests:

    Test Source Source IP Token Result
    1 ��� Host (different IP) Host machine Host bridge IP None 401 Unauthorized
    2 ��� Host with token (control) Host machine Host bridge IP Valid 200 OK
    3 ��� Same IP (exploit) docker exec into legit container 172.28.0.20 None 200 OK
  5. Test 3 is the exploit: poc.py uses docker exec to run an HTTP request from inside the legitimate client's container (IP 172.28.0.20) with no Authorization header. The gateway's authorizeCanvasRequest() matches the source IP against the authenticated WebSocket client and returns 200 OK ��� granting full canvas access without credentials.

  6. Cleanup:

    docker compose down -v
    

Impact

  • Authentication Bypass: Any unauthenticated client sharing an IP with a legitimate WS-authenticated client gains full canvas endpoint access.
  • Information Disclosure: Canvas endpoints serve:
    • The A2UI (Agent-to-User Interface) rendered content, which may contain sensitive data the AI agent is presenting to the user
    • The canvas HTML/JS application
    • The canvas WebSocket upgrade endpoint
  • Scope: Affects all deployments where the gateway is network-exposed (--bind lan) and clients share IP addresses (NAT, VPN, K8s, corporate networks).
  • No auth required: The attacker needs only network adjacency; no credentials, tokens, or user interaction.

-- CREDIT --------------------------------------- This vulnerability was discovered by: Peter Girnus (@gothburz) and Project AESIR of TrendAI Zero Day Initiative

-- FURTHER DETAILS ------------------------------

Supporting files: ZDI-CAN-29311.zip

If supporting files were contained with this report they are provided within a password protected ZIP file. The password is the ZDI candidate number in the form: ZDI-CAN-XXXX where XXXX is the ID number.

Zero Day Initiative zdi-disclosures@trendmicro.com

The PGP key used for all ZDI vendor communications is available from:

http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/documents/disclosures-pgp-key.asc

-- INFORMATION ABOUT THE ZDI -------------------- Established by TippingPoint and acquired by Trend Micro, the Zero Day Initiative (ZDI) neither re-sells vulnerability details nor exploit code. Instead, upon notifying the affected product vendor, the ZDI provides its Trend Micro TippingPoint customers with zero day protection through its intrusion prevention technology. Explicit details regarding the specifics of the vulnerability are not exposed to any parties until an official vendor patch is publicly available.

Please contactZero Day Initiative for further details or refer to:

http://www.zerodayinitiative.com

-- DISCLOSURE POLICY ----------------------------

Zero Day Initiative's vulnerability disclosure policy is available online at:

http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/disclosure_policy/

Fix Commit(s)

  • c45f3c5b004c8d63dc0e282e2176f8c9355d24f1

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
openclaw
< 2026.2.19
2026.2.19

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

openclaw npm → 2026.2.19

npm
npm install openclaw@2026.2.19
yarn
yarn add openclaw@2026.2.19
pnpm
pnpm add openclaw@2026.2.19

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 7.4

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-291: Reliance on IP Address for Authentication

The product uses an IP address for authentication.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use other means of identity verification that cannot be simply spoofed. Possibilities include a username/password or certificate.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-3x84-qq85-fj65
OpenClaw: Browser CDP discovery could accept blocked WebSocket URLs
High Also affects openclaw
GHSA-9c3v-684m-579c
OpenClaw MCP SSE redirects could forward Authorization headers
Medium Also affects openclaw
GHSA-f397-5vjw-v2c2
OpenClaw: Shell inline-command parsing could miss an allowlist check
High Also affects openclaw
GHSA-rx78-29qr-5hq8
OpenClaw: Workspace-derived service PATH could influence trash command selection
High Also affects openclaw
GHSA-ccwh-wwpp-6wg5
OpenClaw: Host environment sanitizer missed two Node.js control variables
High Also affects openclaw
GHSA-985f-72mj-8gf7
OpenClaw: Tool group policy callers could accept unvalidated group IDs
Medium Also affects openclaw
GHSA-9v8j-9c9g-w66c
OpenClaw: Bootstrap token replay could widen pending pairing scopes
Medium Also affects openclaw
GHSA-c226-q6fx-6j6c
OpenClaw: macOS Swift exec allowlist missed combined POSIX inline flags
Medium Also affects openclaw
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor