Skip to content

GHSA-vp9j-rghq-8jhh CVE-2020-10744 PYSEC-2020-208

Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere and Insecure Temporary File in Ansible

Medium PyPI
Severity
0.0 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.26%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 17.18% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-362 Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')
CWE-377 Insecure Temporary File
CWE-668 Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere
Fix
2.10.0rc1
Upgrade ansible to this version or later

Description

An incomplete fix was found for the fix of the flaw CVE-2020-1733 ansible insecure temporary directory when running become_user from become directive. The provided fix is insufficient to prevent the race condition on systems using ACLs and FUSE filesystems. Ansible Engine 2.7.18, 2.8.12, and 2.9.9 as well as previous versions are affected and Ansible Tower 3.4.5, 3.5.6 and 3.6.4 as well as previous versions are affected.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
ansible
>= 2.10.0a1, < 2.10.0rc1
2.10.0rc1
ansible
< 2.9.12
2.9.12
ansible
>= 2.7.0, < 2.8.0a1
>= 2.8.0, < 2.8.13
>= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10
2.8.0a1
2.8.13
2.9.10

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

ansible PyPI → 2.10.0rc1

pip
pip install --upgrade "ansible>=2.10.0rc1"
poetry
poetry add "ansible>=2.10.0rc1"
uv
uv add "ansible>=2.10.0rc1"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
Present
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
Low
Integrity (vulnerable system)
Low
Availability (vulnerable system)
Low
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
Low
Integrity (subsequent systems)
Low
Availability (subsequent systems)
Low

CVSS 3.1 5.0

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

Weakness

CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: In languages that support it, use synchronization primitives. Only wrap these around critical code to minimize the impact on performance.
  • Architecture and Design: Use thread-safe capabilities such as the data access abstraction in Spring.
  • Architecture and Design: Minimize the usage of shared resources in order to remove as much complexity as possible from the control flow and to reduce the likelihood of unexpected conditions occurring. Additionally, this will minimize the amount of synchronization necessary and may even help to reduce the likelihood of a denial of service where an attacker may be able to repeatedly trigger a critical section (CWE-400).
  • Implementation: When using multithreading and operating on shared variables, only use thread-safe functions.
  • Implementation: Use atomic operations on shared variables. Be wary of innocent-looking constructs such as "x++". This may appear atomic at the code layer, but it is actually non-atomic at the instruction layer, since it involves a read, followed by a computation, followed by a write.
  • Implementation: Use a mutex if available, but be sure to avoid related weaknesses such as CWE-412.
  • Implementation: Avoid double-checked locking (CWE-609) and other implementation errors that arise when trying to avoid the overhead of synchronization.
  • Implementation: Disable interrupts or signals over critical parts of the code, but also make sure that the code does not go into a large or infinite loop.
  • Implementation: Use the volatile type modifier for critical variables to avoid unexpected compiler optimization or reordering. This does not necessarily solve the synchronization problem, but it can help.
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.

CWE-377: Insecure Temporary File

Creating and using insecure temporary files can leave application and system data vulnerable to attack.

CWE-668: Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere

The product exposes a resource to the wrong control sphere, providing unintended actors with inappropriate access to the resource.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-8ggh-xwr9-3373
Ansible Community General Collection is vulnerable to exposure of sensitive information
Medium Also affects ansible
GHSA-jpvw-p8pr-9g2x
Ansible symlink attack vulnerability
Medium Also affects ansible
GHSA-cpx3-93w7-457x
Ansible leaks password to logs
High Also affects ansible
GHSA-fh5v-5f35-2rv2
Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File in ansible
Medium Also affects ansible
GHSA-4r65-35qq-ch8j
Ansible discloses sensitive information in traceback error message
Medium Also affects ansible
GHSA-2pfh-q76x-gwvm
Improper Input Validation and Command Injection in Ansible
High Also affects ansible
PYSEC-2021-126
A flaw was found in Ansible if an ansible user sets ANSIBLE_ASYNC_DIR to a subdirectory of a world writable directory.
Not rated yet Also affects ansible
GHSA-r6h7-5pq2-j77h
Insufficiently random values in Ansible
Medium Also affects ansible
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor