Skip to content

GHSA-vcwh-pff9-64cc CVE-2026-22042

RustFS has IAM Incorrect Authorization in ImportIam that Allows Privilege Escalation

High crates.io
Severity
0.0 / 10
High · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.43%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 37.76% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-285 Improper Authorization
Fix
1.0.0-alpha.79
Upgrade rustfs to this version or later

Description

Summary

The ImportIam admin API validates permissions using ExportIAMAction instead of ImportIAMAction, allowing a principal with export-only IAM permissions to perform import operations. Since importing IAM data performs privileged write actions (creating/updating users, groups, policies, and service accounts), this can lead to unauthorized IAM modification and privilege escalation.


Details

In ImportIam, the authorization check is implemented as follows:

validate_admin_request(
    &req.headers,
    &cred,
    owner,
    false,
    vec![Action::AdminAction(AdminAction::ExportIAMAction)],
).await?;

However, this code resides in the Import IAM operation (struct ImportIam {}), which performs state-changing IAM writes.

The expected behavior is to validate against AdminAction::ImportIAMAction (or an equivalent import-specific admin action), not ExportIAMAction.


PoC

Prerequisites

  1. A RustFS deployment with IAM enabled.
  2. An IAM user or role that has Export IAM permission but does not have Import IAM or full admin permissions.
  3. Access credentials for that user.

Steps

  1. Create or obtain an IAM principal with permission equivalent to:

    AdminAction::ExportIAMAction
    

    and without Import IAM privileges.

  2. Prepare a valid IAM import ZIP archive containing, for example:

    • A new policy granting administrative permissions
    • A user or service account bound to that policy
  3. Send a request to the Import IAM endpoint (the same endpoint handled by ImportIam::call), authenticating with the export-only credentials.

  4. Observe that:

    • The request passes authorization.
    • IAM entities from the archive are created or modified successfully.

Expected Result

  • The request should be rejected with an authorization error (e.g., AccessDenied).

Actual Result

  • The request succeeds, and IAM state is modified.

Affected versions

crates.io

PackageVulnerableFixed in
rustfs
< 1.0.0-alpha.79
1.0.0-alpha.79

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

rustfs crates.io → 1.0.0-alpha.79

cargo
cargo update -p rustfs --precise 1.0.0-alpha.79

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
None
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None
Exploit maturity
Proof of concept

CVSS 3.1 8.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-285: Improper Authorization

The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that you perform access control checks related to your business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that you apply to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor.
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-mm2q-qcmx-gw4w
RustFS: ListServiceAccount authorizes against wrong admin action, enabling cross-user enumeration and root service account takeover
High Also affects rustfs
GHSA-pfcq-4gjr-6gjm
RustFS: Missing admin authorization on notification target endpoints allows unauthenticated configuration of event webhooks
High Also affects rustfs
GHSA-mx42-j6wv-px98
RustFS has an authorization bypass in multipart UploadPartCopy enables cross-bucket object exfiltration
Medium Also affects rustfs
GHSA-v9fg-3cr2-277j
Rust has Critical Stored XSS in Preview Modal, leading to Administrative Account Takeover
Medium Also affects rustfs
GHSA-w5fh-f8xh-5x3p
RustFS: Missing Post Policy Validation leads to Arbitrary Object Write
Critical Also affects rustfs
GHSA-r54g-49rx-98cr
RustFS Logs Sensitive Credentials in Plaintext
High Also affects rustfs
GHSA-fc6g-2gcp-2qrq
RustFS has SourceIp bypass via spoofed X-Forwarded-For/Real-IP headers
High Also affects rustfs
GHSA-333v-68xh-8mmq
RustFS's RPC signature verification logs shared secret
High Also affects rustfs
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor