Skip to content

GHSA-v683-rcxx-vpff CVE-2023-44399

ZITADEL's password reset does not respect the "Ignoring unknown usernames" setting

Medium Go
Severity
5.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.66%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 51.82% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-640 Weak Password Recovery Mechanism for Forgotten Password
Fix
2.37.3
Upgrade github.com/zitadel/zitadel to this version or later

Description

Impact

ZITADEL administrators can enable a setting called "Ignoring unknown usernames" which helps mitigate attacks that try to guess/enumerate usernames. While this settings was properly working during the authentication process it did not work correctly on the password reset flow. This meant that even if this feature was active that an attacker could use the password reset function to verify if an account exist within ZITADEL.

Patches

This bug has been patched in versions >2.27.2 beginning with 2.37.3 and 2.38.0

Workarounds

None available we advise to updated if this is needed.

References

None

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/zitadel/zitadel
< 2.37.3
2.37.3

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/zitadel/zitadel Go → 2.37.3

go
go get github.com/zitadel/zitadel@v2.37.3 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-640: Weak Password Recovery Mechanism for Forgotten Password

The product contains a mechanism for users to recover or change their passwords without knowing the original password, but the mechanism is weak.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Make sure that all input supplied by the user to the password recovery mechanism is thoroughly filtered and validated.
  • Architecture and Design: Do not use standard weak security questions and use several security questions.
  • Architecture and Design: Make sure that there is throttling on the number of incorrect answers to a security question. Disable the password recovery functionality after a certain (small) number of incorrect guesses.
  • Architecture and Design: Require that the user properly answers the security question prior to resetting their password and sending the new password to the e-mail address of record.
  • Architecture and Design: Never allow the user to control what e-mail address the new password will be sent to in the password recovery mechanism.
  • Architecture and Design: Assign a new temporary password rather than revealing the original password.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-fgmf-7rf8-m6vf
ZITADEL: Actions V1 sandbox escape: host file read via require()
High Also affects github.com/zitadel/zitadel
GHSA-9993-rfwp-rhwf
ZITADEL: MFA bypass via session reuse in Login V2
High Also affects github.com/zitadel/zitadel
GHSA-v859-c572-qh5p
ZITADEL: Improper Role Revocation on Granted Projects during Multiple Role Deletions
Medium Also affects github.com/zitadel/zitadel
GHSA-jq8w-8q2f-ffm9
ZITADEL Users Can Self-Verify Email/Phone via API
High Also affects github.com/zitadel/zitadel
GHSA-vrh8-c9cm-wh8v
ZITADEL: Unauthorized Token Privilege Escalation in OAuth2 Token Exchange
High Also affects github.com/zitadel/zitadel
GHSA-992q-9gwp-7r79
ZITADEL: Auto-linking by email: IdP-side email verification is not checked
Medium Also affects github.com/zitadel/zitadel
GHSA-v77h-2w3m-94hx
ZITADEL: Missing Token Expiration (`exp`) Validation in JWT IdP Provider
Medium Also affects github.com/zitadel/zitadel
GHSA-g5h5-m4hm-xjrr
ZITADEL: Missing Token Audience Validation (`aud`) in JWT IdP Provider
Medium Also affects github.com/zitadel/zitadel
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor