Skip to content

GHSA-rq2w-37h9-vg94 BIT-tomcat-2022-45143 CVE-2022-45143

Apache Tomcat improperly escapes input from JsonErrorReportValve

High Maven
Severity
7.5 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
2.57%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 85.17% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-116 Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
CWE-74 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
Fix
Available
3 packages have a fixed version

Description

The JsonErrorReportValve in Apache Tomcat 8.5.83, 9.0.40 to 9.0.68 and 10.1.0-M1 to 10.1.1 does not escape the type, message or description values. In some circumstances these are constructed from user provided data and it was therefore possible for users to supply values that invalidated or manipulated the JSON output.

Affected versions

Maven

PackageVulnerableFixed in
org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
>= 8.5.83, < 8.5.84
8.5.84
org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
>= 9.0.40, < 9.0.69
9.0.69
org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
>= 10.1.0, < 10.1.2
10.1.2
org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina
>= 10.1.0, < 10.1.2
10.1.2
org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-util
>= 8.5.83, < 8.5.84
8.5.84
org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-util
>= 9.0.40, < 9.0.69
9.0.69

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core Maven → 8.5.84

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.apache.tomcat.embed</groupId><artifactId>tomcat-embed-core</artifactId><version>8.5.84</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core:8.5.84")

org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina Maven → 10.1.2

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.apache.tomcat</groupId><artifactId>tomcat-catalina</artifactId><version>10.1.2</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina:10.1.2")

org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-util Maven → 8.5.84

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.apache.tomcat</groupId><artifactId>tomcat-util</artifactId><version>8.5.84</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-util:8.5.84")

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 7.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output

The product prepares a structured message for communication with another component, but encoding or escaping of the data is either missing or done incorrectly. As a result, the intended structure of the message is not preserved.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error. Alternately, use built-in functions, but consider using wrappers in case those functions are discovered to have a vulnerability.
  • Architecture and Design: If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated. For example, stored procedures can enforce database query structure and reduce the likelihood of SQL injection.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required encoding strategies.
  • Architecture and Design: In some cases, input validation may be an important strategy when output encoding is not a complete solution. For example, you may be providing the same output that will be processed by multiple consumers that use different encodings or representations. In other cases, you may be required to allow user-supplied input to contain control information, such as limited HTML tags that support formatting in a wiki or bulletin board. When this type of requirement must be met, use an extremely strict allowlist to limit which control sequences can be used. Verify that the resulting syntactic structure is what you expect. Use your normal encoding methods for the remainder of the input.
  • Architecture and Design: Use input validation as a defense-in-depth measure to reduce the likelihood of output encoding errors (see CWE-20).
  • Requirements: Fully specify which encodings are required by components that will be communicating with each other.
  • Implementation: When exchanging data between components, ensure that both components are using the same character encoding. Ensure that the proper encoding is applied at each interface. Explicitly set the encoding you are using whenever the protocol allows you to do so.

CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')

The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component.

How to prevent it
  • Requirements: Programming languages and supporting technologies might be chosen which are not subject to these issues.
  • Implementation: Utilize an appropriate mix of allowlist and denylist parsing to filter control-plane syntax from all input.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-83qj-6fr2-vhqg
Apache Tomcat: Potential RCE and/or information disclosure and/or information corruption with partial PUT
Critical Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-qppj-fm5r-hxr3
HTTP/2 Stream Cancellation Attack
Medium Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-xjgh-84hx-56c5
Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type Apache Tomcat
High Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-cw54-59pw-4g8c
Apache Tomcat Improper Access Control vulnerability
Critical Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina
CVE-2020-1938
Improper Privilege Management in Tomcat
Critical Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-pjfr-qf3p-3q25
When running Apache Tomcat on Windows with HTTP PUTs enabled it was possible to upload a JSP file to the server
High Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-h3x4-894j-xpx5
Apache Tomcat's FORM authentication process has an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability
Critical Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-9xv2-5v5q-p794
Apache Tomcat's DIGEST authenticator has an Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay vulnerability
Critical Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor