GHSA-rchv-x836-w7xp
OpenClaw's dashboard leaked gateway auth material via browser URL/query and localStorage
- Severity
- 7.1 / 10
- High · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- —
- No score published
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
- Fix
2026.3.7- Upgrade openclaw to this version or later
Description
OpenClaw's macOS Dashboard flow exposed Gateway authentication material to browser-controlled surfaces.
Before the fix, the macOS app appended the shared Gateway token and password to the Dashboard URL query string when opening the Control UI in the browser. The Control UI then imported the token and persisted it into browser localStorage under openclaw.control.settings.v1.
This expanded exposure of reusable Gateway admin credentials into browser address-bar/query surfaces and persistent script-readable storage.
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package:
openclaw(npm) - Latest published version verified vulnerable:
2026.3.2 - Affected range:
<= 2026.3.2 - Patched version:
>= 2026.3.7
Impact
An attacker with access to browser-controlled surfaces or persistent browser storage could recover a valid Gateway admin token and reuse it against the OpenClaw management interface.
The exposure chain was:
- macOS
Open Dashboardconstructed a URL with auth material. - The browser received that credential-bearing URL.
- The Control UI imported the token from the URL.
- The Control UI persisted the token in
localStorage.
Fix
The fix aligns the macOS Dashboard flow with the safer existing CLI/bootstrap pattern and removes persistent browser token storage:
- macOS Dashboard now passes the Gateway token via URL fragment instead of query parameters.
- macOS Dashboard no longer propagates the shared Gateway password into browser URLs.
- Control UI keeps Gateway tokens in memory only for the current tab.
- Control UI scrubs legacy persisted tokens from
openclaw.control.settings.v1on load. - Regression tests cover fragment transport, password omission, and token-scrubbing behavior.
Fix Commit(s)
10d0e3f3ca92326df0ca071fabffe463742f263c(March 7, 2026)
Release Process Note
npm 2026.3.7 was published on March 8, 2026. This advisory is fixed in the released package.
Thanks @whiter6666 for reporting.
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| openclaw | < 2026.3.7 |
2026.3.7 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
openclaw npm → 2026.3.7
- npm
npm install openclaw@2026.3.7- yarn
yarn add openclaw@2026.3.7- pnpm
pnpm add openclaw@2026.3.7
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 7.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
References
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-3x84-qq85-fj65 OpenClaw: Browser CDP discovery could accept blocked WebSocket URLs | High | Also affects openclaw |
| GHSA-9c3v-684m-579c OpenClaw MCP SSE redirects could forward Authorization headers | Medium | Also affects openclaw |
| GHSA-f397-5vjw-v2c2 OpenClaw: Shell inline-command parsing could miss an allowlist check | High | Also affects openclaw |
| GHSA-rx78-29qr-5hq8 OpenClaw: Workspace-derived service PATH could influence trash command selection | High | Also affects openclaw |
| GHSA-ccwh-wwpp-6wg5 OpenClaw: Host environment sanitizer missed two Node.js control variables | High | Also affects openclaw |
| GHSA-985f-72mj-8gf7 OpenClaw: Tool group policy callers could accept unvalidated group IDs | Medium | Also affects openclaw |
| GHSA-9v8j-9c9g-w66c OpenClaw: Bootstrap token replay could widen pending pairing scopes | Medium | Also affects openclaw |
| GHSA-c226-q6fx-6j6c OpenClaw: macOS Swift exec allowlist missed combined POSIX inline flags | Medium | Also affects openclaw |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor