Skip to content

GHSA-r6gq-whwq-mvg9 CVE-2026-70626 PYSEC-2026-3732

NLTK: Symlink escape in CorpusReader allows arbitrary local file read outside the corpus root

Medium PyPI
Severity
0.0 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.20%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 9.83% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-59 Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following')
Fix
3.9.4
Upgrade nltk to this version or later

Description

Summary

nltk.corpus.reader.api.CorpusReader.open() can be used to read files outside the intended corpus root via a symlink placed inside that root. Although NLTK blocks absolute paths and .. traversal, the current boundary check is only lexical and does not account for symlink resolution. This leads to an arbitrary local file read / filesystem sandbox bypass for applications that rely on CorpusReader or FileSystemPathPointer to restrict file access.

Details

The vulnerable flow is:

  • nltk/corpus/reader/api.py:222

    • CorpusReader.open() blocks absolute paths and .., then calls self._root.join(file).open()
  • nltk/data.py:398

    • FileSystemPathPointer.join() joins the requested file ID and checks whether the resulting path still appears to remain under the configured root

The problem is that the check is based on the lexical path after os.path.normpath(), not on the resolved path after following symlinks.

Current behavior:

  1. CorpusReader.open() rejects:
    • absolute paths
    • .. path traversal
  2. FileSystemPathPointer.join() computes:
    • joined = os.path.normpath(os.path.join(self._path, fileid))
    • root = os.path.normpath(self._path)
  3. It allows the access if joined starts with root

This misses the case where a path stays inside the root lexically, but resolves outside the root via a symlink already present under the allowed directory.

Example:

JOINED=/tmp/nltk-root/link/secret.txt
REALPATH=/tmp/outside/secret.txt

JOINED still appears to be inside the root, but REALPATH is outside it.

This is distinct from simple ../ traversal:

  • the file ID is not absolute
  • the file ID does not contain ..
  • the escape only happens after filesystem resolution of a symlink under the allowed root

PoC

Reproduced in an isolated Docker sandbox using the local nltk clone.

Minimal Python PoC:

import os
import tempfile
from nltk.corpus.reader.api import CorpusReader

root = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="nltk-root-")
outside_dir = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="nltk-out-")
outside_file = os.path.join(outside_dir, "secret.txt")

with open(outside_file, "w") as f:
    f.write("secret-data")

os.symlink(outside_dir, os.path.join(root, "link"))

corpus = CorpusReader(root, ["link/secret.txt"])
with corpus.open("link/secret.txt") as f:
    print(f.read())

Observed result:

secret-data

Docker re-test output:

ROOT=/tmp/nltk-root-jjxay3if
OUTSIDE_DIR=/tmp/nltk-out-1kef36e0
JOINED=/tmp/nltk-root-jjxay3if/link/secret.txt
REALPATH=/tmp/nltk-out-1kef36e0/secret.txt
READ_OK=secret-data
INSIDE_ROOT=True
REAL_INSIDE_ROOT=False

Additional impact validation using a system file:

ROOT=/tmp/nltk-root-_h5x4m19
JOINED=/tmp/nltk-root-_h5x4m19/hostfile
REALPATH=/etc/hostname
HOSTNAME_READ=48dafb244af3
INSIDE_ROOT=True
REAL_INSIDE_ROOT=False

This shows that the issue is not limited to attacker-created files outside the root; it can also read existing system files that are readable by the application user.

Impact

This is an arbitrary local file read / symlink escape issue.

Who is impacted:

  • applications that accept attacker-controlled corpus directories, extracted datasets, or package contents
  • applications that rely on NLTK corpus readers as a trust boundary for file access
  • any deployment where an attacker can place or influence files inside the allowed corpus root

Practical impact includes disclosure of:

  • application secrets stored on disk
  • local configuration files
  • private datasets
  • process-exposed files such as /proc/self/environ
  • system files readable by the running user

The issue is best described as a filesystem sandbox bypass caused by improper link resolution before file access.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
nltk
< 3.9.4
3.9.4

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

nltk PyPI → 3.9.4

pip
pip install --upgrade "nltk>=3.9.4"
poetry
poetry add "nltk>=3.9.4"
uv
uv add "nltk>=3.9.4"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
High
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

CVSS 3.1 6.2

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-59: Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following')

The product attempts to access a file based on the filename, but it does not properly prevent that filename from identifying a link or shortcut that resolves to an unintended resource.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Follow the principle of least privilege when assigning access rights to entities in a software system. Denying access to a file can prevent an attacker from replacing that file with a link to a sensitive file. Ensure good compartmentalization in the system to provide protected areas that can be trusted.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-j456-xh4h-cpf2
NLTK: WekaClassifier passes an unvalidated caller-controlled model path to the weka JVM, bypassing nltk.pathsec containment
High Also affects nltk
GHSA-ff5c-cp5c-9wjf
NLTK: Uncontrolled resource consumption in RecursiveDescentParser via ambiguous or left-recursive grammars
Medium Also affects nltk
GHSA-f794-5jv7-7672
NLTK: Downloader.download follows hardlinks and overwrites outside-root files
High Also affects nltk
GHSA-8mgp-746c-j5xp
NLTK: Model-artifact APIs bypass pathsec and touch files outside allowed roots
High Also affects nltk
GHSA-8mpw-7fpc-4gqj
NLTK: Pl196xCorpusReader has quadratic ReDoS on malformed TEI blocks
Low Also affects nltk
GHSA-cw6x-m8jw-qmrh
NLTK: Uncontrolled recursion in nltk.featstruct.FeatStructReader causes unhandled RecursionError (DoS) via deeply nested feature-structure input
Medium Also affects nltk
GHSA-vp2x-qp44-57v7
NLTK: Quadratic CPU Exhaustion in `XMLCorpusView._read_xml_fragment()`
Low Also affects nltk
GHSA-ww6m-cw3f-q94g
NLTK: Quadratic-time DoS in PorterStemmer via long runs of 'y'
High Also affects nltk
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor