GHSA-qw65-cvwx-89v3 CVE-2026-84292
fast-uri vulnerable to authority injection via an unvalidated port in serialize
- Severity
- 7.5 / 10
- High · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.24%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 15.04% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-116 Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
- Fix
2.4.6- Upgrade fast-uri to this version or later
Description
Impact
fast-uri serializes the port component of a URI without validating it. When recomposing the authority, fast-uri escapes the userinfo and host components but concatenates the port verbatim, so a port value that is not a sequence of digits can inject authority delimiters. For example, serializing a component whose port is @127.0.0.1:8124 produces http://trusted.example:@127.0.0.1:8124/app, demoting the intended host to userinfo and pointing the authority at an attacker-controlled host. Both fast-uri and Node's URL read the result back as the attacker's host with no error, so re-validating the built URI does not catch it.
This affects applications that build URIs from parts and assign untrusted data to the port component (for example a fixed host from configuration and a port taken from user input or a service record). The same path is reachable through serialize(), normalize(), and equal() in their object forms. A port obtained from parse() is always digits and is not affected.
Patches
This vulnerability has been patched in fast-uri 4.1.4, 3.1.7, and 2.4.6. recomposeAuthority now rejects any port that is not *DIGIT per RFC 3986. All users should upgrade.
Workarounds
If upgrading is not immediately possible, validate the port value against the RFC 3986 grammar (digits only) before passing a component to serialize(), normalize(), or equal(), and reject anything else, for example if (!/^\d*$/.test(String(port))) throw new Error('invalid port').
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| fast-uri | < 2.4.6 |
2.4.6 |
| fast-uri | >= 3.0.0, < 3.1.7 |
3.1.7 |
| fast-uri | >= 4.0.0, < 4.1.4 |
4.1.4 |
| fast-uri | < 2.4.6 |
2.4.6 |
| fast-uri | >= 3.0.0, < 3.1.7 |
3.1.7 |
| fast-uri | >= 4.0.0, < 4.1.4 |
4.1.4 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
fast-uri npm → 2.4.6
- npm
npm install fast-uri@2.4.6- yarn
yarn add fast-uri@2.4.6- pnpm
pnpm add fast-uri@2.4.6
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
The product prepares a structured message for communication with another component, but encoding or escaping of the data is either missing or done incorrectly. As a result, the intended structure of the message is not preserved.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error. Alternately, use built-in functions, but consider using wrappers in case those functions are discovered to have a vulnerability.
- Architecture and Design: If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated. For example, stored procedures can enforce database query structure and reduce the likelihood of SQL injection.
- Architecture and Design, Implementation: Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required encoding strategies.
- Architecture and Design: In some cases, input validation may be an important strategy when output encoding is not a complete solution. For example, you may be providing the same output that will be processed by multiple consumers that use different encodings or representations. In other cases, you may be required to allow user-supplied input to contain control information, such as limited HTML tags that support formatting in a wiki or bulletin board. When this type of requirement must be met, use an extremely strict allowlist to limit which control sequences can be used. Verify that the resulting syntactic structure is what you expect. Use your normal encoding methods for the remainder of the input.
- Architecture and Design: Use input validation as a defense-in-depth measure to reduce the likelihood of output encoding errors (see CWE-20).
- Requirements: Fully specify which encodings are required by components that will be communicating with each other.
- Implementation: When exchanging data between components, ensure that both components are using the same character encoding. Ensure that the proper encoding is applied at each interface. Explicitly set the encoding you are using whenever the protocol allows you to do so.
References
Advisories
Fixes and patches
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-333x-w4r6-6crp fast-uri vulnerable to scheme injection via an unescaped first-segment colon in suffix references | Low | Also affects fast-uri |
| GHSA-w74x-v6f9-j3xg fast-uri vulnerable to URI scheme spoofing via percent-encoded scheme decoding | Medium | Also affects fast-uri |
| GHSA-wjr9-j795-jxcr fast-uri vulnerable to host confusion via unchecked WHATWG host canonicalization | Medium | Also affects fast-uri |
| GHSA-xhq7-xmqj-769h fast-uri vulnerable to improper path equivalence in relative reference normalization | Low | Also affects fast-uri |
| GHSA-jvvf-x445-j334 fast-uri vulnerable to mailto header injection via percent-encoded field-name desynchronization | Medium | Also affects fast-uri |
| GHSA-hrr3-gc8f-f4qj fast-uri vulnerable to inconsistent host case normalization via percent-encoded octets | Medium | Also affects fast-uri |
| GHSA-58mr-gqgx-xq4g fast-uri vulnerable to host confusion via an unclosed bracket in the URI authority | High | Also affects fast-uri |
| GHSA-jqff-g426-hqxp fast-uri vulnerable to host confusion via percent-encoded scheme normalization | High | Also affects fast-uri |
Credits: UlisesGascon, YashvantHange, mcollina
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor