Skip to content

GHSA-qrrf-xvcf-p64q CVE-2022-4797 GO-2022-1244

usememos/memos vulnerable Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts

Medium Go
Severity
4.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.76%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 55.33% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-307 Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts
Fix
0.9.1
Upgrade github.com/usememos/memos to this version or later

Description

In usememos/memos 0.9.0 and prior, an attacker can delete other users' posts via post id, which can be done via brute force.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/usememos/memos
< 0.9.1
0.9.1

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/usememos/memos Go → 0.9.1

go
go get github.com/usememos/memos@v0.9.1 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 4.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts

The product does not implement sufficient measures to prevent multiple failed authentication attempts within a short time frame.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Common protection mechanisms include: Disconnecting the user after a small number of failed attempts Implementing a timeout Locking out a targeted account Requiring a computational task on the user's part.
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator. [REF-45]

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-gqp3-hfc3-8q54
Memos has an Incorrect Privilege Assignment issue
Medium Also affects github.com/usememos/memos
GHSA-qgjp-5g5x-vhq2
memos lacks file name validation or verification
Medium Also affects github.com/usememos/memos
GHSA-99m2-qwx6-2w6f
memos vulnerability allows arbitrarily modification or deletion registered identity providers
Medium Also affects github.com/usememos/memos
GHSA-mg56-wc4q-rw4w
memos vulnerability allows the creation of arbitrary accounts
High Also affects github.com/usememos/memos
GHSA-8p44-g572-557h
memos vulnerability allows arbitrarily modification or deletion of attachments
Medium Also affects github.com/usememos/memos
GHSA-8jcj-g9f4-qx42
memos vulnerability allows arbitrarily reactions deletion
Medium Also affects github.com/usememos/memos
GHSA-mr34-8733-grr2
Memos' Access Tokens Stay Valid after User Password Change
High Also affects github.com/usememos/memos
GHSA-cgrg-86m5-xm4w
Memos Vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting
Medium Also affects github.com/usememos/memos
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor