Skip to content

GHSA-qp4f-2w67-c8hw BIT-jenkins-2020-2099 CVE-2020-2099

Inbound TCP Agent Protocol/3 authentication bypass in Jenkins

High Maven
Severity
8.6 / 10
High · CVSS 3.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
1.01%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 63.22% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-323 Reusing a Nonce, Key Pair in Encryption
CWE-330 Use of Insufficiently Random Values
Fix
2.204.2
Upgrade org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core to this version or later

Description

Jenkins 2.213 and earlier, LTS 2.204.1 and earlier includes support for the Inbound TCP Agent Protocol/3 for communication between controller and agents. While this protocol has been deprecated in 2018 and was recently removed from Jenkins in 2.214, it could still easily be enabled in Jenkins LTS 2.204.1, 2.213, and older.

This protocol incorrectly reuses encryption parameters which allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to determine the connection secret. This secret can then be used to connect attacker-controlled Jenkins agents to the Jenkins controller.

Jenkins 2.204.2 no longer allows for the use of Inbound TCP Agent Protocol/3 by default. The system property jenkins.slaves.JnlpSlaveAgentProtocol3.ALLOW_UNSAFE can be set to true to allow enabling the Inbound TCP Agent Protocol/3 in Jenkins 2.204.2, but doing so is strongly discouraged.

Inbound TCP Agent Protocol/3 was removed completely from Jenkins 2.214 and will not be part of Jenkins LTS after the end of the 2.204.x line.

Affected versions

Maven

PackageVulnerableFixed in
org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core
< 2.204.2
2.204.2
org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core
>= 2.205, < 2.214
2.214

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core Maven → 2.204.2

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.jenkins-ci.main</groupId><artifactId>jenkins-core</artifactId><version>2.204.2</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core:2.204.2")

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.0 8.6

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

Weakness

CWE-323: Reusing a Nonce, Key Pair in Encryption

Nonces should be used for the present occasion and only once.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Refuse to reuse nonce values.
  • Implementation: Use techniques such as requiring incrementing, time based and/or challenge response to assure uniqueness of nonces.

CWE-330: Use of Insufficiently Random Values

The product uses insufficiently random numbers or values in a security context that depends on unpredictable numbers.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use a well-vetted algorithm that is currently considered to be strong by experts in the field, and select well-tested implementations with adequate length seeds. In general, if a pseudo-random number generator is not advertised as being cryptographically secure, then it is probably a statistical PRNG and should not be used in security-sensitive contexts. Pseudo-random number generators can produce predictable numbers if the generator is known and the seed can be guessed. A 256-bit seed is a good starting point for producing a "random enough" number.
  • Implementation: Consider a PRNG that re-seeds itself as needed from high quality pseudo-random output sources, such as hardware devices.
  • Architecture and Design, Requirements: Use products or modules that conform to FIPS 140-2 [REF-267] to avoid obvious entropy problems. Consult FIPS 140-2 Annex C ("Approved Random Number Generators").

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-6f9g-cxwr-q5jr
Arbitrary file read vulnerability through the Jenkins CLI can lead to RCE
Critical Known exploited Also affects org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core
GHSA-8pqx-3rxx-f5pm
Jenkins discloses project names via fingerprints
High Known exploited Also affects org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core
GHSA-26wc-3wqp-g3rp
Deserialization of Untrusted Data in Jenkins
Critical Known exploited Also affects org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core
CVE-2018-1000861
Deserialization of Untrusted Data in Jenkins
Critical Known exploited Also affects org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core
GHSA-m6wv-wh8g-64xc
Jenkins does not encrypt secrets from POST config.xml submissions before storing them in job configurations
Medium Also affects org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core
GHSA-93qh-vwrm-c5pw
Jenkins: Stored XSS vulnerability in node offline cause description
Medium Also affects org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core
GHSA-92m7-4fpw-2wxm
Jenkins: Open Redirect phishing attacks possible via "from" parameter in "Delegate to servlet container"
Medium Also affects org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core
GHSA-g28p-6mcc-v4rv
Jenkins exposes other users' timezone and view names to users with Overall/Read permission
Medium Also affects org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor