Skip to content

GHSA-qh36-44jv-c8xj CVE-2020-8562 GO-2022-0617

Potential proxy IP restriction bypass in Kubernetes

Low Go
Severity
3.1 / 10
Low · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
1.19%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 67.88% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-367 Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published

Description

As mitigations to a report from 2019 and CVE-2020-8555, Kubernetes attempts to prevent proxied connections from accessing link-local or localhost networks when making user-driven connections to Services, Pods, Nodes, or StorageClass service providers. As part of this mitigation Kubernetes does a DNS name resolution check and validates that response IPs are not in the link-local (169.254.0.0/16) or localhost (127.0.0.0/8) range. Kubernetes then performs a second DNS resolution without validation for the actual connection. If a non-standard DNS server returns different non-cached responses, a user may be able to bypass the proxy IP restriction and access private networks on the control plane. All versions of Kubernetes are impacted, and there is no fix in place.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
k8s.io/kubernetes
>= 1.21.0, <= 1.21.1
No fix yet
k8s.io/kubernetes
>= 1.20.0, <= 1.20.7
No fix yet
k8s.io/kubernetes
>= 1.19.0, <= 1.19.11
No fix yet
k8s.io/kubernetes
<= 1.18.19
No fix yet
k8s.io/kubernetes
all versions
No fix yet

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 3.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-367: Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition

The product checks the state of a resource before using that resource, but the resource's state can change between the check and the use in a way that invalidates the results of the check.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: The most basic advice for TOCTOU vulnerabilities is to not perform a check before the use. This does not resolve the underlying issue of the execution of a function on a resource whose state and identity cannot be assured, but it does help to limit the false sense of security given by the check.
  • Implementation: When the file being altered is owned by the current user and group, set the effective gid and uid to that of the current user and group when executing this statement.
  • Architecture and Design: Limit the interleaving of operations on files from multiple processes.
  • Implementation, Architecture and Design: If you cannot perform operations atomically and you must share access to the resource between multiple processes or threads, then try to limit the amount of time (CPU cycles) between the check and use of the resource. This will not fix the problem, but it could make it more difficult for an attack to succeed.
  • Implementation: Recheck the resource after the use call to verify that the action was taken appropriately.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that some environmental locking mechanism can be used to protect resources effectively.
  • Implementation: Ensure that locking occurs before the check, as opposed to afterwards, such that the resource, as checked, is the same as it is when in use.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-r6j8-c6r2-37rr
kube-controller-manager is vulnerable to half-blind Server Side Request Forgery through in-tree Portworx StorageClass
Medium Also affects k8s.io/kubernetes
GHSA-4x4m-3c2p-qppc
Kubernetes Nodes can delete themselves by adding an OwnerReference
Medium Also affects k8s.io/kubernetes
GHSA-hj2p-8wj8-pfq4
kubernetes allows nodes to bypass dynamic resource allocation authorization checks
Low Also affects k8s.io/kubernetes
GO-2025-3547
Kubernetes kube-apiserver Vulnerable to Race Condition
Low Also affects k8s.io/kubernetes
GHSA-3wgm-2gw2-vh5m
Kubernetes GitRepo Volume Inadvertent Local Repository Access
Medium Also affects k8s.io/kubernetes
GHSA-vv39-3w5q-974q
Kubernetes allows Command Injection affecting Windows nodes via nodes/*/logs/query API
Medium Also affects k8s.io/kubernetes
GHSA-jgfp-53c3-624w
Node Denial of Service via kubelet Checkpoint API
Medium Also affects k8s.io/kubernetes
GHSA-27wf-5967-98gx
Kubernetes kubelet arbitrary command execution
High Also affects k8s.io/kubernetes
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor