Skip to content

GHSA-q8hx-mm92-4wvg CVE-2024-47763 PYSEC-2024-312 RUSTSEC-2024-0440

wasmtime has a runtime crash when combining tail calls with trapping imports

Medium PyPIcrates.io
Severity
0.0 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.24%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 15.73% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-617 Reachable Assertion
CWE-670 Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
Fix
21.0.2
Upgrade wasmtime to this version or later

Description

Impact

Wasmtime's implementation of WebAssembly tail calls combined with stack traces can result in a runtime crash in certain WebAssembly modules. The runtime crash may be undefined behavior if Wasmtime was compiled with Rust 1.80 or prior. The runtime crash is a deterministic process abort when Wasmtime is compiled with Rust 1.81 and later.

WebAssembly tail calls are a proposal which relatively recently reached stage 4 in the standardization process. Wasmtime first enabled support for tail calls by default in Wasmtime 21.0.0, although that release contained a bug where it was only on-by-default for some configurations. In Wasmtime 22.0.0 tail calls were enabled by default for all configurations.

The specific crash happens when an exported function in a WebAssembly module (or component) performs a return_call (or return_call_indirect or return_call_ref) to an imported host function which captures a stack trace (for example, the host function raises a trap). In this situation, the stack-walking code previously assumed there was always at least one WebAssembly frame on the stack but with tail calls that is no longer true. With the tail-call proposal it's possible to have an entry trampoline appear as if it directly called the exit trampoline. This situation triggers an internal assert in the stack-walking code which raises a Rust panic!().

When Wasmtime is compiled with Rust versions 1.80 and prior this means that an extern "C" function in Rust is raising a panic!(). This is technically undefined behavior and typically manifests as a process abort when the unwinder fails to unwind Cranelift-generated frames. When Wasmtime is compiled with Rust versions 1.81 and later this panic becomes a deterministic process abort.

Overall the impact of this issue is that this is a denial-of-service vector where a malicious WebAssembly module or component can cause the host to crash. There is no other impact at this time other than availability of a service as the result of the crash is always a crash and no more.

This issue was discovered by routine fuzzing performed by the Wasmtime project via Google's OSS-Fuzz infrastructure. We have no evidence that it has ever been exploited by an attacker in the wild.

Patches

All versions of Wasmtime which have tail calls enabled by default have been patched:

  • 21.0.x - patched in 21.0.2
  • 22.0.x - patched in 22.0.1
  • 23.0.x - patched in 23.0.3
  • 24.0.x - patched in 24.0.1
  • 25.0.x - patched in 25.0.2

Wasmtime versions from 12.0.x (the first release with experimental tail call support) to 20.0.x (the last release with tail-calls off-by-default) have support for tail calls but the support is disabled by default. These versions are not affected in their default configurations, but users who explicitly enabled tail call support will need to either disable tail call support or upgrade to a patched version of Wasmtime.

Workarounds

The main workaround for this issue is to disable tail support for tail calls in Wasmtime, for example with Config::wasm_tail_call(false). Users are otherwise encouraged to upgrade to patched versions.

References

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
wasmtime-bin
<= 21.0.0
<= 21.0.1
<= 22.0.0
<= 23.0.0
<= 23.0.1
<= 23.0.2
<= 24.0.0
<= 25.0.0
<= 25.0.1
No fix yet

crates.io

PackageVulnerableFixed in
wasmtime
>= 12.0.0, < 21.0.2
21.0.2
wasmtime
>= 22.0.0, < 22.0.1
22.0.1
wasmtime
>= 23.0.0, < 23.0.3
23.0.3
wasmtime
>= 24.0.0, < 24.0.1
24.0.1
wasmtime
>= 25.0.0, < 25.0.2
25.0.2
wasmtime
>= 21.0.0, < 21.0.2
>= 22.0.0, < 22.0.1
>= 23.0.0, < 23.0.3
>= 24.0.0, < 24.0.1
>= 25.0.0, < 25.0.2
21.0.2
22.0.1
23.0.3
24.0.1
25.0.2

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

wasmtime crates.io → 21.0.2

cargo
cargo update -p wasmtime --precise 21.0.2

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
None
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
High
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

CVSS 3.1 5.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-617: Reachable Assertion

The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Make sensitive open/close operation non reachable by directly user-controlled data (e.g. open/close resources)
  • Implementation: Perform input validation on user data.

CWE-670: Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation

The code contains a control flow path that does not reflect the algorithm that the path is intended to implement, leading to incorrect behavior any time this path is navigated.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
RUSTSEC-2026-0424
Unchecked memory usage in transferring borrowed resources between components
Not rated yet Also affects wasmtime
RUSTSEC-2026-0423
Cross-engine type confusion with host-created struct-types-with-supertypes
Not rated yet Also affects wasmtime
RUSTSEC-2026-0422
Typed functions with `i31` or `nullref` arguments may panic due to insufficient type-check
Low Also affects wasmtime
RUSTSEC-2026-0379
Wasmtime: Cranelift backend on aarch64 can jump to incorrect target on large Wasm `br_table` instruction
Critical Also affects wasmtime
GHSA-9pvw-hwfg-92h5
Wasmtime: Panic lowering a host-created component model stream into a guest that expects a different payload type
Medium Also affects wasmtime
GHSA-897f-g5gm-fmxm
Wasmtime: Bit-packing in Cranelift compiler causes silent overflow and miscompilation
Critical Also affects wasmtime
RUSTSEC-2026-0364
Exception tags can cause host data structures to be unaligned
Not rated yet Also affects wasmtime
RUSTSEC-2026-0363
Component-model handle tables are capped only per instance and charged to no limit
Medium Also affects wasmtime
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor