Skip to content

GHSA-mfvq-m3jj-8864 CVE-2022-4800 GO-2022-1240

usememos/memos vulnerable to Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel

Medium Go
Severity
6.5 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.63%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 50.02% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-940 Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel
Fix
0.9.1
Upgrade github.com/usememos/memos to this version or later

Description

usememos/memos 0.9.0 and prior is vulnerable to Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/usememos/memos
< 0.9.1
0.9.1

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/usememos/memos Go → 0.9.1

go
go get github.com/usememos/memos@v0.9.1 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-940: Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel

The product establishes a communication channel to handle an incoming request that has been initiated by an actor, but it does not properly verify that the request is coming from the expected origin.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use a mechanism that can validate the identity of the source, such as a certificate, and validate the integrity of data to ensure that it cannot be modified in transit using an Adversary-in-the-Middle (AITM) attack. When designing functionality of actions in the URL scheme, consider whether the action should be accessible to all mobile applications, or if an allowlist of applications to interface with is appropriate.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-gqp3-hfc3-8q54
Memos has an Incorrect Privilege Assignment issue
Medium Also affects github.com/usememos/memos
GHSA-qgjp-5g5x-vhq2
memos lacks file name validation or verification
Medium Also affects github.com/usememos/memos
GHSA-99m2-qwx6-2w6f
memos vulnerability allows arbitrarily modification or deletion registered identity providers
Medium Also affects github.com/usememos/memos
GHSA-mg56-wc4q-rw4w
memos vulnerability allows the creation of arbitrary accounts
High Also affects github.com/usememos/memos
GHSA-8p44-g572-557h
memos vulnerability allows arbitrarily modification or deletion of attachments
Medium Also affects github.com/usememos/memos
GHSA-8jcj-g9f4-qx42
memos vulnerability allows arbitrarily reactions deletion
Medium Also affects github.com/usememos/memos
GHSA-mr34-8733-grr2
Memos' Access Tokens Stay Valid after User Password Change
High Also affects github.com/usememos/memos
GHSA-cgrg-86m5-xm4w
Memos Vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting
Medium Also affects github.com/usememos/memos
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor