GHSA-mfhv-gwf8-4m88 CVE-2021-3597
undertow Race Condition vulnerability
- Severity
- 5.9 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 1.16%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 67.20% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-362 Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')
- Fix
2.2.9.Final- Upgrade io.undertow:undertow-core to this version or later
Description
A flaw was found in undertow. The HTTP2SourceChannel fails to write the final frame under some circumstances, resulting in a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is availability. This flaw affects Undertow versions prior to 2.0.35.SP1, prior to 2.2.6.SP1, prior to 2.2.7.SP1, prior to 2.0.36.SP1, prior to 2.2.9.Final and prior to 2.0.39.Final.
Affected versions
Maven
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| io.undertow:undertow-core | >= 2.1.0, < 2.2.9.Final |
2.2.9.Final |
| io.undertow:undertow-core | < 2.0.39.Final |
2.0.39.Final |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
io.undertow:undertow-core Maven → 2.2.9.Final
- maven
<dependency><groupId>io.undertow</groupId><artifactId>undertow-core</artifactId><version>2.2.9.Final</version></dependency>- gradle
implementation("io.undertow:undertow-core:2.2.9.Final")
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 5.9
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')
The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: In languages that support it, use synchronization primitives. Only wrap these around critical code to minimize the impact on performance.
- Architecture and Design: Use thread-safe capabilities such as the data access abstraction in Spring.
- Architecture and Design: Minimize the usage of shared resources in order to remove as much complexity as possible from the control flow and to reduce the likelihood of unexpected conditions occurring. Additionally, this will minimize the amount of synchronization necessary and may even help to reduce the likelihood of a denial of service where an attacker may be able to repeatedly trigger a critical section (CWE-400).
- Implementation: When using multithreading and operating on shared variables, only use thread-safe functions.
- Implementation: Use atomic operations on shared variables. Be wary of innocent-looking constructs such as "x++". This may appear atomic at the code layer, but it is actually non-atomic at the instruction layer, since it involves a read, followed by a computation, followed by a write.
- Implementation: Use a mutex if available, but be sure to avoid related weaknesses such as CWE-412.
- Implementation: Avoid double-checked locking (CWE-609) and other implementation errors that arise when trying to avoid the overhead of synchronization.
- Implementation: Disable interrupts or signals over critical parts of the code, but also make sure that the code does not go into a large or infinite loop.
- Implementation: Use the volatile type modifier for critical variables to avoid unexpected compiler optimization or reordering. This does not necessarily solve the synchronization problem, but it can help.
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-3x3v-w654-m28m Undertow: Denial of Service via Multipart/Form-Data Parsing on HTTP GET Requests | Medium | Also affects io.undertow:undertow-core |
| GHSA-33hj-rcmx-86mv Undertow Servlets Vulnerable to Remote DoS via OutOfMemoryError when Passed Large Parameter Names | High | Also affects io.undertow:undertow-core |
| GHSA-j382-5jj3-vw4j Undertow HTTP server core doesn't properly validate the Host header in incoming HTTP requests | Critical | Also affects io.undertow:undertow-core |
| GHSA-6h4f-pj3g-q8fq Undertow OutOfMemory when parsing form data encoding with application/x-www-form-urlencoded | High | Also affects io.undertow:undertow-core |
| GHSA-95h4-w6j8-2rp8 Undertow MadeYouReset HTTP/2 DDoS Vulnerability | High | Also affects io.undertow:undertow-core |
| GHSA-3jrv-jgp8-45v3 Undertow incorrectly parses cookies | High | Also affects io.undertow:undertow-core |
| GHSA-97cq-f4jm-mv8h Undertow Denial of Service vulnerability | High | Also affects io.undertow:undertow-core |
| GHSA-9623-mqmm-5rcf Undertow vulnerable to Race Condition | High | Also affects io.undertow:undertow-core |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor