Skip to content

GHSA-m5vv-6r4h-3vj9 CVE-2024-35255 GO-2024-2918 PYSEC-2026-1209

Azure Identity Libraries and Microsoft Authentication Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Medium GoMavenNuGetPyPInpm
Severity
6.8 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.83%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 57.57% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-362 Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')
Fix
Available
8 packages have a fixed version

Description

Azure Identity Libraries and Microsoft Authentication Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity
< 1.6.0-beta.4.0.20240610221955-50774cd97099
1.6.0-beta.4.0.20240610221955-50774cd97099
github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity
< 1.6.0-beta.4.0.20240610221955-50774cd97099
1.6.0-beta.4.0.20240610221955-50774cd97099
github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity
< 1.6.0
1.6.0

Maven

PackageVulnerableFixed in
com.azure:azure-identity
< 1.12.2
1.12.2
com.azure:azure-identity
< 1.12.2
1.12.2
com.microsoft.azure:msal4j
>= 1.14.4-beta, < 1.15.1
1.15.1
com.microsoft.azure:msal4j
>= 1.14.4-beta, < 1.15.1
1.15.1

NuGet

PackageVulnerableFixed in
Azure.Identity
< 1.11.4
1.11.4
Azure.Identity
< 1.11.4
1.11.4
Microsoft.Identity.Client
>= 4.49.1, < 4.60.4
4.60.4
Microsoft.Identity.Client
>= 4.61.0, < 4.61.3
4.61.3
Microsoft.Identity.Client
>= 4.49.1, < 4.60.4
4.60.4
Microsoft.Identity.Client
>= 4.61.0, < 4.61.3
4.61.3

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
azure-identity
< 1.16.1
1.16.1
azure-identity
< 1.16.1
1.16.1

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
@azure/identity
< 4.2.1
4.2.1
@azure/identity
< 4.2.1
4.2.1
@azure/msal-node
>= 2.7.0, < 2.9.2
2.9.2
@azure/msal-node
>= 2.7.0, < 2.9.2
2.9.2

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity Go → 1.6.0-beta.4.0.20240610221955-50774cd97099

go
go get github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity@v1.6.0-beta.4.0.20240610221955-50774cd97099 && go mod tidy

com.azure:azure-identity Maven → 1.12.2

maven
<dependency><groupId>com.azure</groupId><artifactId>azure-identity</artifactId><version>1.12.2</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("com.azure:azure-identity:1.12.2")

com.microsoft.azure:msal4j Maven → 1.15.1

maven
<dependency><groupId>com.microsoft.azure</groupId><artifactId>msal4j</artifactId><version>1.15.1</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("com.microsoft.azure:msal4j:1.15.1")

Azure.Identity NuGet → 1.11.4

dotnet
dotnet add package Azure.Identity --version 1.11.4

Microsoft.Identity.Client NuGet → 4.60.4

dotnet
dotnet add package Microsoft.Identity.Client --version 4.60.4

azure-identity PyPI → 1.16.1

pip
pip install --upgrade "azure-identity>=1.16.1"
poetry
poetry add "azure-identity>=1.16.1"
uv
uv add "azure-identity>=1.16.1"

@azure/identity npm → 4.2.1

npm
npm install @azure/identity@4.2.1
yarn
yarn add @azure/identity@4.2.1
pnpm
pnpm add @azure/identity@4.2.1

@azure/msal-node npm → 2.9.2

npm
npm install @azure/msal-node@2.9.2
yarn
yarn add @azure/msal-node@2.9.2
pnpm
pnpm add @azure/msal-node@2.9.2

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 6.8

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

CVSS 3.1 5.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: In languages that support it, use synchronization primitives. Only wrap these around critical code to minimize the impact on performance.
  • Architecture and Design: Use thread-safe capabilities such as the data access abstraction in Spring.
  • Architecture and Design: Minimize the usage of shared resources in order to remove as much complexity as possible from the control flow and to reduce the likelihood of unexpected conditions occurring. Additionally, this will minimize the amount of synchronization necessary and may even help to reduce the likelihood of a denial of service where an attacker may be able to repeatedly trigger a critical section (CWE-400).
  • Implementation: When using multithreading and operating on shared variables, only use thread-safe functions.
  • Implementation: Use atomic operations on shared variables. Be wary of innocent-looking constructs such as "x++". This may appear atomic at the code layer, but it is actually non-atomic at the instruction layer, since it involves a read, followed by a computation, followed by a write.
  • Implementation: Use a mutex if available, but be sure to avoid related weaknesses such as CWE-412.
  • Implementation: Avoid double-checked locking (CWE-609) and other implementation errors that arise when trying to avoid the overhead of synchronization.
  • Implementation: Disable interrupts or signals over critical parts of the code, but also make sure that the code does not go into a large or infinite loop.
  • Implementation: Use the volatile type modifier for critical variables to avoid unexpected compiler optimization or reordering. This does not necessarily solve the synchronization problem, but it can help.
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-xcx6-jx8p-x3h5
MSAL Node authorization code flow may disclose parameters to an attacker-controlled endpoint
Medium Also affects @azure/msal-node
GHSA-5wjr-9356-4wc8
Tokio: Race condition in `tokio::time::Interval`
Medium Same weakness, CWE-362
GHSA-44jh-23m7-hpcf
@better-auth/drizzle-adapter: Concurrent requests can exceed rate limits on PostgreSQL
Medium Same weakness, CWE-362
GHSA-494h-xx7x-5frh
Microsoft Security Advisory CVE-2026-70183 - ASP.NET Core Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability
High Same weakness, CWE-362
GO-2026-6617
HTTP/2 server crash due to HPACK encoder race in net/http
High Same weakness, CWE-362
GHSA-xvgh-hmx8-9xxf
Backstage: Improper task state validation in Scaffolder backend
High Same weakness, CWE-362
GHSA-pr7f-p5mw-fc87
vLLM: Incomplete CVE-2025-62164 remediation can be bypassed by concurrent prompt parts
Medium Same weakness, CWE-362
GHSA-2hw9-mc66-jc2q
Wasmtime: Preemption and traps during bulk operations enable breaking internal VM state
Low Same weakness, CWE-362

Credits: localden, scottaddie

Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor