GHSA-jq2f-59pj-p3m3 CVE-2026-41128
Craft CMS has a Missing Authorization Check on User Group Removal via save-permissions Action
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.25%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 16.20% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-862 Missing Authorization
- Fix
5.9.15- Upgrade craftcms/cms to this version or later
Description
Summary
The actionSavePermissions() endpoint allows a user with only viewUsers permission to remove arbitrary users from all user groups. While _saveUserGroups() enforces per-group authorization for additions, it performs no equivalent authorization check for removals, so submitting an empty groups value removes all existing group memberships.
Affected Versions
- Craft CMS 5.6.0 through 5.9.14 (latest release at time of report)
- Regression introduced in 5.6.0 when the
viewUserspermission was added - Prior to 5.6.0,
editedUser()requirededitUsers, which implicitly protected this endpoint - Requires Pro edition or higher (the vulnerable code path is gated by
CmsEdition::Pro)
Vulnerability Details
Root Cause
This is a regression introduced in Craft CMS 5.6.0 when the viewUsers permission was added. Before that change, editedUser() required editUsers permission for accessing other users’ data, which implicitly protected actionSavePermissions(). After the change, actionSavePermissions() became reachable for users with read-only access to other users, but the underlying group-saving logic still lacked authorization for group removals.
The vulnerability has two components:
-
actionSavePermissions()reachable with read-only access: The action only requires a control panel request and delegates toeditedUser(), which now only checksviewUsers— a permission explicitly documented as "read-only access to user elements." -
Asymmetric authorization in
_saveUserGroups(): The method checksassignUserGrouppermission only when adding a user to a new group. When thegroupsparameter is an empty string (resulting in an empty array), the loop is skipped entirely, no authorization checks are run, and all group memberships are removed.
Prerequisites
- Attacker has a control panel account with
accessCpandviewUserspermissions only - Target user belongs to one or more user groups that grant additional permissions
- Pro edition or higher
Attack Steps
- Attacker authenticates to the Control Panel
- Attacker sends a POST request to
actions/users/save-permissionswith:userId= target user's IDgroups= `` (empty string)
- All group memberships for the target user are removed
- All permissions inherited from those groups are immediately revoked
Impact
- Privilege revocation: An attacker can strip group-based permissions from arbitrary users, including accounts whose effective access derives from group membership
- Denial of access: Users lose access to sections, volumes, and features that were granted through group membership
- Bypass of elevated session requirement: Group removal does not trigger
requireElevatedSession()(which is only triggered when new groups are added)
Affected versions
Packagist
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| craftcms/cms | >= 5.6.0, < 5.9.15 |
5.9.15 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
craftcms/cms Packagist → 5.9.15
- composer
composer require craftcms/cms:^5.9.15
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- None
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- None
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- Low
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
Weakness
CWE-862: Missing Authorization
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-7vrx-9684-xrf2 Craft CMS stores arbitrary content provided by unauthenticated users in session files | Medium Known exploited | Also affects craftcms/cms |
| GHSA-f3gw-9ww9-jmc3 Craft CMS Allows Remote Code Execution | Critical Known exploited | Also affects craftcms/cms |
| GHSA-x684-96hh-833x Craft CMS has a potential RCE with a compromised security key | High Known exploited | Also affects craftcms/cms |
| GHSA-2p6p-9rc9-62j9 Craft CMS has potential RCE when PHP `register_argc_argv` config setting is enabled | Critical Known exploited | Also affects craftcms/cms |
| GHSA-wg23-69c2-gjc8 Craft CMS: Passkey login accepts replayed WebAuthn assertions | Medium | Also affects craftcms/cms |
| GHSA-957r-qf9p-67xw Craft CMS: Arbitrary file read via SplFileObject in non-sandboxed template contexts | Medium | Also affects craftcms/cms |
| GHSA-596p-6jv8-775v Craft CMS: Authenticated leak of secret environment variables | Medium | Also affects craftcms/cms |
| GHSA-xxpx-f366-4xpq Craft CMS: Authorization bypass: view-only Categories user can modify category structure via structures/move-element | Medium | Also affects craftcms/cms |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor