Skip to content

GHSA-jq2f-59pj-p3m3 CVE-2026-41128

Craft CMS has a Missing Authorization Check on User Group Removal via save-permissions Action

Medium Packagist
Severity
0.0 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.25%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 16.20% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-862 Missing Authorization
Fix
5.9.15
Upgrade craftcms/cms to this version or later

Description

Summary

The actionSavePermissions() endpoint allows a user with only viewUsers permission to remove arbitrary users from all user groups. While _saveUserGroups() enforces per-group authorization for additions, it performs no equivalent authorization check for removals, so submitting an empty groups value removes all existing group memberships.

Affected Versions

  • Craft CMS 5.6.0 through 5.9.14 (latest release at time of report)
  • Regression introduced in 5.6.0 when the viewUsers permission was added
  • Prior to 5.6.0, editedUser() required editUsers, which implicitly protected this endpoint
  • Requires Pro edition or higher (the vulnerable code path is gated by CmsEdition::Pro)

Vulnerability Details

Root Cause

This is a regression introduced in Craft CMS 5.6.0 when the viewUsers permission was added. Before that change, editedUser() required editUsers permission for accessing other users’ data, which implicitly protected actionSavePermissions(). After the change, actionSavePermissions() became reachable for users with read-only access to other users, but the underlying group-saving logic still lacked authorization for group removals.

The vulnerability has two components:

  1. actionSavePermissions() reachable with read-only access: The action only requires a control panel request and delegates to editedUser(), which now only checks viewUsers — a permission explicitly documented as "read-only access to user elements."

  2. Asymmetric authorization in _saveUserGroups(): The method checks assignUserGroup permission only when adding a user to a new group. When the groups parameter is an empty string (resulting in an empty array), the loop is skipped entirely, no authorization checks are run, and all group memberships are removed.

Prerequisites

  • Attacker has a control panel account with accessCp and viewUsers permissions only
  • Target user belongs to one or more user groups that grant additional permissions
  • Pro edition or higher

Attack Steps

  1. Attacker authenticates to the Control Panel
  2. Attacker sends a POST request to actions/users/save-permissions with:
    • userId = target user's ID
    • groups = `` (empty string)
  3. All group memberships for the target user are removed
  4. All permissions inherited from those groups are immediately revoked

Impact

  • Privilege revocation: An attacker can strip group-based permissions from arbitrary users, including accounts whose effective access derives from group membership
  • Denial of access: Users lose access to sections, volumes, and features that were granted through group membership
  • Bypass of elevated session requirement: Group removal does not trigger requireElevatedSession() (which is only triggered when new groups are added)

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
craftcms/cms
>= 5.6.0, < 5.9.15
5.9.15

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

craftcms/cms Packagist → 5.9.15

composer
composer require craftcms/cms:^5.9.15

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
None
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
Low
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

Weakness

CWE-862: Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-7vrx-9684-xrf2
Craft CMS stores arbitrary content provided by unauthenticated users in session files
Medium Known exploited Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-f3gw-9ww9-jmc3
Craft CMS Allows Remote Code Execution
Critical Known exploited Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-x684-96hh-833x
Craft CMS has a potential RCE with a compromised security key
High Known exploited Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-2p6p-9rc9-62j9
Craft CMS has potential RCE when PHP `register_argc_argv` config setting is enabled
Critical Known exploited Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-wg23-69c2-gjc8
Craft CMS: Passkey login accepts replayed WebAuthn assertions
Medium Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-957r-qf9p-67xw
Craft CMS: Arbitrary file read via SplFileObject in non-sandboxed template contexts
Medium Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-596p-6jv8-775v
Craft CMS: Authenticated leak of secret environment variables
Medium Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-xxpx-f366-4xpq
Craft CMS: Authorization bypass: view-only Categories user can modify category structure via structures/move-element
Medium Also affects craftcms/cms
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor