Skip to content

GHSA-jc43-qrrp-98f5 CVE-2019-19714

Insert tag injection in the Contao login module

Medium Packagist
Severity
5.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.82%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 57.24% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-116 Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

Impact

It is possible to inject insert tags into the login module which will be replaced when the page is rendered.

Patches

Update to Contao 4.8.6.

Workarounds

None.

References

https://contao.org/en/security-advisories/insert-tag-injection-in-the-login-module

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, open an issue in contao/contao.

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
contao/contao
>= 4.8.4, < 4.8.6
4.8.6
contao/core-bundle
>= 4.8.4, < 4.8.6
4.8.6

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

contao/contao Packagist → 4.8.6

composer
composer require contao/contao:^4.8.6

contao/core-bundle Packagist → 4.8.6

composer
composer require contao/core-bundle:^4.8.6

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output

The product prepares a structured message for communication with another component, but encoding or escaping of the data is either missing or done incorrectly. As a result, the intended structure of the message is not preserved.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error. Alternately, use built-in functions, but consider using wrappers in case those functions are discovered to have a vulnerability.
  • Architecture and Design: If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated. For example, stored procedures can enforce database query structure and reduce the likelihood of SQL injection.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required encoding strategies.
  • Architecture and Design: In some cases, input validation may be an important strategy when output encoding is not a complete solution. For example, you may be providing the same output that will be processed by multiple consumers that use different encodings or representations. In other cases, you may be required to allow user-supplied input to contain control information, such as limited HTML tags that support formatting in a wiki or bulletin board. When this type of requirement must be met, use an extremely strict allowlist to limit which control sequences can be used. Verify that the resulting syntactic structure is what you expect. Use your normal encoding methods for the remainder of the input.
  • Architecture and Design: Use input validation as a defense-in-depth measure to reduce the likelihood of output encoding errors (see CWE-20).
  • Requirements: Fully specify which encodings are required by components that will be communicating with each other.
  • Implementation: When exchanging data between components, ensure that both components are using the same character encoding. Ensure that the proper encoding is applied at each interface. Explicitly set the encoding you are using whenever the protocol allows you to do so.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-9ff2-p842-45wq
Contao: Cross-site request forgery in custom backend actions
Low Also affects contao/core-bundle
GHSA-q6wp-fr43-gm9v
Contao: Improper access control in the preview links module
Medium Also affects contao/core-bundle
GHSA-5974-gfqc-wrcm
Contao: Improper access control in the table access voter
Medium Also affects contao/core-bundle
GHSA-mrvp-7wmx-5m4h
Contao: Path traversal in the images controller
Medium Also affects contao/core-bundle
GHSA-mfxh-vp55-7gc6
Contao: The registration module re-sends activation mails
Medium Also affects contao/core-bundle
GHSA-x2rp-9qf7-2fmq
Contao: Protected page content is disclosed to anonymous visitors after contao.search.index_protected is disabled
Medium Also affects contao/core-bundle
GHSA-grm4-wm43-9jh5
Contao: Possible path traversal in job download URIs
Low Also affects contao/contao
GHSA-87mg-5grr-rhwh
Contao: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via Unvalidated RSS Feed URL in Feed Reader Module
Low Also affects contao/contao
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor