Skip to content

GHSA-j8r2-6x86-q33q CVE-2023-32681 PYSEC-2023-74

Unintended leak of Proxy-Authorization header in requests

Medium PyPI
Severity
6.1 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
2.97%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 87.26% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
Fix
2.31.0
Upgrade requests to this version or later

Description

Impact

Since Requests v2.3.0, Requests has been vulnerable to potentially leaking Proxy-Authorization headers to destination servers, specifically during redirects to an HTTPS origin. This is a product of how rebuild_proxies is used to recompute and reattach the Proxy-Authorization header to requests when redirected. Note this behavior has only been observed to affect proxied requests when credentials are supplied in the URL user information component (e.g. https://username:password@proxy:8080).

Current vulnerable behavior(s):

  1. HTTP → HTTPS: leak
  2. HTTPS → HTTP: no leak
  3. HTTPS → HTTPS: leak
  4. HTTP → HTTP: no leak

For HTTP connections sent through the proxy, the proxy will identify the header in the request itself and remove it prior to forwarding to the destination server. However when sent over HTTPS, the Proxy-Authorization header must be sent in the CONNECT request as the proxy has no visibility into further tunneled requests. This results in Requests forwarding the header to the destination server unintentionally, allowing a malicious actor to potentially exfiltrate those credentials.

The reason this currently works for HTTPS connections in Requests is the Proxy-Authorization header is also handled by urllib3 with our usage of the ProxyManager in adapters.py with proxy_manager_for. This will compute the required proxy headers in proxy_headers and pass them to the Proxy Manager, avoiding attaching them directly to the Request object. This will be our preferred option going forward for default usage.

Patches

Starting in Requests v2.31.0, Requests will no longer attach this header to redirects with an HTTPS destination. This should have no negative impacts on the default behavior of the library as the proxy credentials are already properly being handled by urllib3's ProxyManager.

For users with custom adapters, this may be potentially breaking if you were already working around this behavior. The previous functionality of rebuild_proxies doesn't make sense in any case, so we would encourage any users impacted to migrate any handling of Proxy-Authorization directly into their custom adapter.

Workarounds

For users who are not able to update Requests immediately, there is one potential workaround.

You may disable redirects by setting allow_redirects to False on all calls through Requests top-level APIs. Note that if you're currently relying on redirect behaviors, you will need to capture the 3xx response codes and ensure a new request is made to the redirect destination.

import requests
r = requests.get('http://github.com/', allow_redirects=False)

Credits

This vulnerability was discovered and disclosed by the following individuals.

Dennis Brinkrolf, Haxolot (https://haxolot.com/) Tobias Funke, (tobiasfunke93@gmail.com)

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
requests
>= 2.3.0, < 2.31.0
2.31.0
requests
>= 2.3.0, < 2.31.0
2.31.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

requests PyPI → 2.31.0

pip
pip install --upgrade "requests>=2.31.0"
poetry
poetry add "requests>=2.31.0"
uv
uv add "requests>=2.31.0"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-gc5v-m9x4-r6x2
Requests has Insecure Temp File Reuse in its extract_zipped_paths() utility function
Medium Also affects requests
GHSA-9hjg-9r4m-mvj7
Requests vulnerable to .netrc credentials leak via malicious URLs
Medium Also affects requests
GHSA-9wx4-h78v-vm56
Requests `Session` object does not verify requests after making first request with verify=False
Medium Also affects requests
GHSA-x84v-xcm2-53pg
Insufficiently Protected Credentials in Requests
High Also affects requests
GHSA-pg2w-x9wp-vw92
Python Requests Session Fixation
Medium Also affects requests
GHSA-cfj3-7x9c-4p3h
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in Requests
Medium Also affects requests
GHSA-652x-xj99-gmcc
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in Requests
Medium Also affects requests
GHSA-j7qq-vr8c-xvw3
MLflow CrewAI autologging records LLM provider API keys in logged trace spans
Medium Same weakness, CWE-200
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor