Skip to content

GHSA-j224-7qr4-8646 CVE-2019-17104

Centreon Does Not Set HTTPOnly Flag

High Packagist
Severity
7.5 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
1.94%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 80.16% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-565 Reliance on Cookies without Validation and Integrity Checking
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published

Description

In Centreon VM through 19.04.3, the cookie configuration within the Apache HTTP Server does not protect against theft because the HTTPOnly flag is not set.

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
centreon/centreon
<= 19.04.3
No fix yet

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 7.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-565: Reliance on Cookies without Validation and Integrity Checking

The product relies on the existence or values of cookies when performing security-critical operations, but it does not properly ensure that the setting is valid for the associated user.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Avoid using cookie data for a security-related decision.
  • Implementation: Perform thorough input validation (i.e.: server side validation) on the cookie data if you're going to use it for a security related decision.
  • Architecture and Design: Add integrity checks to detect tampering.
  • Architecture and Design: Protect critical cookies from replay attacks, since cross-site scripting or other attacks may allow attackers to steal a strongly-encrypted cookie that also passes integrity checks. This mitigation applies to cookies that should only be valid during a single transaction or session. By enforcing timeouts, you may limit the scope of an attack. As part of your integrity check, use an unpredictable, server-side value that is not exposed to the client.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-626r-cj47-p49g
Centreon insertGraphTemplate SQL Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
High Also affects centreon/centreon
GHSA-2j4g-v4fv-rhwg
Centreon updateContactHostCommands SQL Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
High Also affects centreon/centreon
GHSA-j8hg-v5qv-9m28
Centreon updateContactServiceCommands SQL Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
High Also affects centreon/centreon
GHSA-j4pc-vqvc-4p9x
Centreon updateLCARelation SQL Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
High Also affects centreon/centreon
GHSA-qjvm-p5vg-437c
Centreon updateGroups SQL Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
High Also affects centreon/centreon
GHSA-22v7-v3mj-pm8r
Centreon updateDirectory SQL Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
High Also affects centreon/centreon
GHSA-j5wx-jvw3-j363
Centreon vulnerable to SQL Injection
Critical Also affects centreon/centreon
GHSA-rv5q-72p2-2q24
Centreon contains cross-site scripting vulnerability via esc_name parameter
Medium Also affects centreon/centreon
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor