Skip to content

GHSA-hx8v-g79f-8w5f CVE-2026-59823 PYSEC-2026-4070

LiteLLM Proxy has server-side request forgery via the `user_config` request parameter

Medium PyPI
Severity
0.0 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.44%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 38.17% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Fix
1.83.9
Upgrade litellm to this version or later

Description

Summary

A server-side request forgery in LiteLLM Proxy lets an authenticated caller redirect the proxy's outbound request to a host of their choosing by smuggling an api_base inside the user_config request body, bypassing the existing parameter guard.

Details

LiteLLM Proxy validates request bodies with is_request_body_safe, which blocks the api_base and base_url parameters but does not cover user_config. The user_config object is used to build the outbound router for a request, so a caller can place an api_base inside it and reach an arbitrary host. The guard only inspected the two top-level keys, so the same api_base nested inside user_config was never checked.

Exploitation requires a valid virtual key.

Impact

An authenticated caller can make the proxy issue server-side requests to internal or external hosts of their choosing, reaching endpoints the caller cannot otherwise access.

Affected / Patched

Affected: <= 1.83.8 Patched: 1.83.9

Remediation

Upgrade to 1.83.9 or later (released 2026-04-17).

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
litellm
< 1.83.9
1.83.9

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

litellm PyPI → 1.83.9

pip
pip install --upgrade "litellm>=1.83.9"
poetry
poetry add "litellm>=1.83.9"
uv
uv add "litellm>=1.83.9"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
Low
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
Low
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

Weakness

CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-7488-6r32-c95q
LiteLLM: MCP Authentication Bypass via OAuth2 Passthrough Fallback
High Known exploited Also affects litellm
GHSA-v4p8-mg3p-g94g
LiteLLM: Authenticated command execution via MCP stdio test endpoints
High Known exploited Also affects litellm
GHSA-r75f-5x8p-qvmc
LiteLLM has SQL Injection in Proxy API key verification
Critical Known exploited Also affects litellm
GHSA-g5ff-637f-6q2m
LiteLLM: internal_user_viewer arbitrary local file read via `vertex_ai_credentials`
High Also affects litellm
GHSA-hhww-mrg2-969h
LiteLLM vulnerable to reflected XSS in /sso/debug/callback
Medium Also affects litellm
GHSA-7hp6-4w63-5g45
LiteLLM: Privilege Escalation to Proxy Admin via Cross-Domain Reuse of the Salt Key
Critical Also affects litellm
GHSA-3cv6-jpf6-8222
LiteLLM: Authenticated SSRF and provider-credential exfiltration via unvalidated request-body routing parameters
Medium Also affects litellm
GHSA-6wvf-77m9-58rm
LiteLLM vulnerable to server-side template injection in the /prompts/test endpoint
Critical Also affects litellm
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor