Skip to content

GHSA-hwvv-438r-mhvj BIT-elasticsearch-2021-22134 CVE-2021-22134

Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

Medium Maven
Severity
4.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
1.11%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 65.97% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
Fix
7.11.0
Upgrade org.elasticsearch:elasticsearch to this version or later

Description

A document disclosure flaw was found in Elasticsearch versions after 7.6.0 and before 7.11.0 when Document or Field Level Security is used. Get requests do not properly apply security permissions when executing a query against a recently updated document. This affects documents that have been updated and not yet refreshed in the index. This could result in the search disclosing the existence of documents and fields the attacker should not be able to view.

Affected versions

Maven

PackageVulnerableFixed in
org.elasticsearch:elasticsearch
>= 7.6.0, < 7.11.0
7.11.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

org.elasticsearch:elasticsearch Maven → 7.11.0

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.elasticsearch</groupId><artifactId>elasticsearch</artifactId><version>7.11.0</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.elasticsearch:elasticsearch:7.11.0")

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 4.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-mrfm-jxgf-2h6v
Elasticsearch Improper Access Control vulnerability
High Known exploited Also affects org.elasticsearch:elasticsearch
GHSA-w94p-6mhw-4qxw
Improper Access Control in Elasticsearch
High Known exploited Also affects org.elasticsearch:elasticsearch
GHSA-mm3m-5497-xggg
Elasticsearch Uncontrolled Resource Consumption Vulnerability
High Also affects org.elasticsearch:elasticsearch
GHSA-5xm9-x7x4-4j5x
Elasticsearch Vulnerable to Stack Overflow due to a Large Recursion
High Also affects org.elasticsearch:elasticsearch
GHSA-jgx4-7v3v-vwfm
Elasticsearch allocation of resources without limits or throttling leads to crash
High Also affects org.elasticsearch:elasticsearch
GHSA-5mpw-4546-2wcr
Elasticsearch Incorrect Authorization vulnerability
Medium Also affects org.elasticsearch:elasticsearch
GHSA-5v8f-xx9m-wj44
Elasticsearch stores private key on disk unencrypted
High Also affects org.elasticsearch:elasticsearch
GHSA-2hjr-vmf3-xwvp
Elasticsearch Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File
Medium Also affects org.elasticsearch:elasticsearch
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor