Skip to content

GHSA-h67m-xg8f-fxcf BIT-tensorflow-2021-41213 CVE-2021-41213 PYSEC-2021-405 PYSEC-2021-622 PYSEC-2021-820

Deadlock in mutually recursive `tf.function` objects

Medium PyPI
Severity
5.5 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.24%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 15.52% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-662 Improper Synchronization
CWE-667 Improper Locking
Fix
Available
3 packages have a fixed version

Description

Impact

The code behind tf.function API can be made to deadlock when two tf.function decorated Python functions are mutually recursive:

import tensorflow as tf

@tf.function()               
def fun1(num):
    if num == 1:
        return
    print(num)
    fun2(num-1)

@tf.function()
def fun2(num):
    if num == 0:
        return
    print(num)
    fun1(num-1)

fun1(9)

This occurs due to using a non-reentrant Lock Python object.

Loading any model which contains mutually recursive functions is vulnerable. An attacker can cause denial of service by causing users to load such models and calling a recursive tf.function, although this is not a frequent scenario.

Patches

We have patched the issue in GitHub commit afac8158d43691661ad083f6dd9e56f327c1dcb7.

The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.7.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.6.1, TensorFlow 2.5.2, and TensorFlow 2.4.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

For more information

Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.

Attribution

This vulnerability has been reported by members of the Aivul Team from Qihoo 360.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
tensorflow
>= 2.6.0, < 2.6.1
2.6.1
tensorflow
>= 2.5.0, < 2.5.2
2.5.2
tensorflow
< 2.4.4
2.4.4
tensorflow
< 2.4.4
>= 2.5.0, < 2.5.2
>= 2.6.0, < 2.6.1
>= 2.7.0rc0, < 2.7.0
2.4.4
2.5.2
2.6.1
2.7.0
tensorflow-cpu
>= 2.6.0, < 2.6.1
2.6.1
tensorflow-cpu
>= 2.5.0, < 2.5.2
2.5.2
tensorflow-cpu
< 2.4.4
2.4.4
tensorflow-cpu
< 2.4.4
>= 2.5.0, < 2.5.2
>= 2.6.0, < 2.6.1
>= 2.7.0rc0, < 2.7.0
2.4.4
2.5.2
2.6.1
2.7.0
tensorflow-gpu
>= 2.6.0, < 2.6.1
2.6.1
tensorflow-gpu
>= 2.5.0, < 2.5.2
2.5.2
tensorflow-gpu
< 2.4.4
2.4.4
tensorflow-gpu
< 2.4.4
>= 2.5.0, < 2.5.2
>= 2.6.0, < 2.6.1
>= 2.7.0rc0, < 2.7.0
2.4.4
2.5.2
2.6.1
2.7.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

tensorflow PyPI → 2.6.1

pip
pip install --upgrade "tensorflow>=2.6.1"
poetry
poetry add "tensorflow>=2.6.1"
uv
uv add "tensorflow>=2.6.1"

tensorflow-cpu PyPI → 2.6.1

pip
pip install --upgrade "tensorflow-cpu>=2.6.1"
poetry
poetry add "tensorflow-cpu>=2.6.1"
uv
uv add "tensorflow-cpu>=2.6.1"

tensorflow-gpu PyPI → 2.6.1

pip
pip install --upgrade "tensorflow-gpu>=2.6.1"
poetry
poetry add "tensorflow-gpu>=2.6.1"
uv
uv add "tensorflow-gpu>=2.6.1"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-662: Improper Synchronization

The product utilizes multiple threads, processes, components, or systems to allow temporary access to a shared resource that can only be exclusive to one process at a time, but it does not properly synchronize these actions, which might cause simultaneous accesses of this resource by multiple threads or processes.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Use industry standard APIs to synchronize your code.

CWE-667: Improper Locking

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Use industry standard APIs to implement locking mechanism.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-gjh7-xx4r-x345
TensorFlow has segfault in array_ops.upper_bound
High Also affects tensorflow
GHSA-fxgc-95xx-grvq
TensorFlow Denial of Service vulnerability
Medium Also affects tensorflow
GHSA-93vr-9q9m-pj8p
TensorFlow vulnerable to Out-of-Bounds Read in DynamicStitch
High Also affects tensorflow
GHSA-qjqc-vqcf-5qvj
TensorFlow vulnerable to seg fault in `tf.raw_ops.Print`
High Also affects tensorflow
GHSA-7jvm-xxmr-v5cw
TensorFlow vulnerable to integer overflow in EditDistance
High Also affects tensorflow
GHSA-64jg-wjww-7c5w
TensorFlow has Null Pointer Error in TensorArrayConcatV2
High Also affects tensorflow
GHSA-6hg6-5c2q-7rcr
TensorFlow has Heap-buffer-overflow in AvgPoolGrad
High Also affects tensorflow
GHSA-558h-mq8x-7q9g
TensorFlow has Null Pointer Error in SparseSparseMaximum
High Also affects tensorflow
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor